« Guess the Party Affiliation | Main | Hamas: Islam Will Conquer Rome »

Obama as Commander-in-Chief would then have to provide the troops with new weapons:

French Army Knife

And he's willing to sit down and talk calmly with the president of Iran...the same man who murders homosexuals. Once again I must say it, liberalism is a mental disorder.

OUCH. This is a particularly vicious screed today.

Mama always taught me to make fun of people for what they choose, BUT NEVER for what they were born as.

I'm talking not just about TRUE CONSERVATIVES like Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho), who choose to hide his sexual preference by getting married and adopting his wife's children, while publicly supporting anti-homosexual legislation and privately schlongmouthing in airport restrooms.

TRUE CONSERVATIVE television pundit Ann Coulter was born a hermaphrodite with both male and female characteristics. Her parents and doctors choose to make her female, though they couldn't prevent the emergence of that giant Adams apple and those huge man hands. She did NOT CHOOSE to be the "transgendered freakazoid" you're so fearful of. She chose to be a feaakzoid conservative commentator instead.

Aren't Craig and Coulter doing our evil bidding well enough without sliming them for how they were born?

Man, get a clue.

WRITE IN QUAYLE '08 -- CONFIDENT IN SEXUAL ORIENTATION

Dan, can you provide some links with facts about Ann's condition at birth, and the medical treatment she went through? I did not know that about her.

Wow, that woman can really kick ass, you've explained it. And I never knew.

Too bad Hillary Clinton's parents were not as understanding, in a reverse analogy kind of way.

Regardless of her condition at birth, she is still much smarter and hotter than any of the MoonBats I deal with, on a daily basis, in the SF Bay Area (Professionals or otherwise). And, to be exact, most if not all of the Professional MoonBats don't practice the mature grooming and bathing habits of Ann.

Really, please produce some links = facts.

I tend to ignore "Dan Quayle." He's what a liberal would be if they went to a party dressed as a conservative.

I laughed so hard reading this article, there were tears in my eyes.

BRUSSELS (AFP) - The EU Commission on Monday rejected claims that producing biofuels is a "crime against humanity" that threatens food supplies, and vowed to stick to its goals as part of a climate change package......

The European Environment Agency, advisors to the European Commission, on Friday recommended that the EU suspend its 10 percent biofuels target. It argued that the target would require large amounts of additional imports of biofuels leading to the accelerated destruction of rain forests. The agency also questioned the environmental benefits of biofuels.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080414/sc_afp/euunfarmpovertyenergypoliticsbiofuel_080414143918

Oh, me too. But, considering the entertainment value of his hate rant (because Ann does get under the MoonBat skin, so to speak). That was just good to pass up.

Dan must have just come off of a 'group think' liberal pity party at the Kos......... and still had not come off of its high yet. The Kos is like main line drugs to the truly leftoids like Dan.

Hust too good not to chuck a rock at....

Born as? I've yet to see a baby fresh from the womb clutching a rainbow flag. Just out of curiosity, DQ; has Science located a gene or set of genes always present in both males and females who exhibit homosexual behavior? Perhaps if they thoroughly searched the X chromosome, common to both.

Not that it matters, does it? Stay on message and never doubt your certitude.

The guy calling himself "Dan Quayle," like most ultra- liberals (Especially those who troll this site), lacks the mental capacity to properly refute any conservative arguments, especially those made by someone as smart and witty as Coulter. So he instead has to result to throwing stupid insults about her appearance and vicious, brainless lies to communicate his blind hatred.

I couldn't have said better uppitychuck. As with all things in nature, that which separates us humans from the animal kingdom is that annoying little thing called "Choice". And of course the point is completely missed. This is America, land of the free and "home of the brave". The Constitution states that we are all created equal... I somehow see no logic in elevating one group to "super untouchable status" over sexual preference. We are all entitled to the pursuit of happiness, just keep it behind closed doors and don't push it off on others, or use it to elevate yourself beyond what your work in this world dictates. I'm all for treating people fairly, prosecuting people who break the law in regard to how they treat people on the job, but don't go "assigning rights to chosen individuals" that there rest of America doesn't have. DQ seems to be OCD about "$chlong#outhing" these days... what a nasty individual you are.
I'm with Oiao... quit making claims without producing some evidence. You could be right, which only means that Ann is 10x the man you are, and she looks better in a little black dress than most of us.

Theres a reason why "Dan Quayle 2008" comments mainly on gay themed entries. Remember G. ???
Thats him.

It would be great if you were to study some military history your would realize the numbers of gay and transgender service members that have always served our country in time of war and in peace time. I am a Transgendered Viet-Nam Vet and have served beside gays.
You make insane assumptions about the conduct of people. It's always the 'straight' guys who seek gay sex, because it's thrilling and dangerous in their little minds.
As far as assuming we would be considered 'superior' in claiming the same rights that you have, just show how much you don't know what it is to be gender variant.

Oiao,

Well, you can get thousands of web links by just typing "Ann Coulter hermaphrodite" into any search engine, but you don't understand how this works.

As wingbats, we aren't so concerned with the "facts" as we are the "truth".

The attempted use of facts dooms us every time.

I learned these rules from Ann Coulter herself:

1. Sling vicious accusations without any facts to back them up -- the most important thing is to get your truth heard.

2. This is best accomplished by being completely outrageous. Over the top. Mean spirited. Vicious. Shrill.

3. Shout down your opponents. Make up "facts" to back up your argument.

4. As your opponents attempt to refute your truth with facts, cut them off. Grab a phrase or minor point from their argument and expound on it endlessly.

5. Pounce on any trite statement and bury them with it. Attack the person, not the argument.

6. If cornered, ask an irrelevant question. While your opponent tries to figure out what's going on, quickly change the subject.

I must say, you folks do a fine job at this. I note a few "truths" you cite:

o "most ultra- liberals ...lack[s] the mental capacity to properly refute any conservative arguments" (rule 1)

o "I've yet to see a baby fresh from the womb clutching a rainbow flag." (rule 2)

o "The Constitution states that we are all created equal." (rule 3) [you're probably thinking of the Declaration of Independence]

o "Dan Quayle ... comments mainly on gay themed entries." (rule 5)

o "producing biofuels is a 'crime against humanity' that threatens food supplies" (rule 6)

Far from being offended, I'm sure Ann got wood after seeing her playbook used to such great effect by a serious Presidential candidate.

I am that candidate. That is a fact. Um, I mean, that is the truth.

WRITE IN QUAYLE '08 -- READY TO EXPOUND TRUTH

o "The Constitution states that we are all created equal." (rule 3) [you're probably thinking of the Declaration of Independence]

Well DQ, I stand corrected on that one. I still don't believe that what you cite as being Ann Coulter's modus operandi is true (but rest assured, I'll be looking into it). I have seen and read her many times and she can cite the source of her information. Sounds more like how most of the "intellectual liberals" operate. And from what I have seen, liberal truth seems to be based on "let's pretend as if" fanatasy, but that would be a personal opinion.

Sarah, I for one am fully aware that many gays have served in our military with honor and distinction. The one thing you cannot deny though, is the need for absolute discipline and the "don't ask, don't tell" policy protects the privacy and personal rights of every soldier. I don't think anyone wants the military looking like a bad episode of the Jerry Springer Show. JMHO.

Danny boy,
Coulter is a lawyer what mode of attack would you suggest. Sarah are you saying you were transsexual DURING your tour of duty or you decided to be transsexual after you got out of the service?

"1. Sling vicious accusations without any facts to back them up -- the most important thing is to get your truth heard."

She supplies bibliographies in her books that show which sources she cited in making her arguments.

"I am a Transgendered Viet-Nam Vet and have served beside gays."

And I'm not and so far as I know, I didn't. SO WHAT?

I've known two gay men and a lesbian and I've counted them amoung my GOOD FRIENDS. The reason is that they didn't shove their "gayness" in my face and they didn't try to "convert" me. They went about their business and what they did behind closed doors was none of my business.

What offends me and my fellow conservatives is the sexual "in your face" attitude that is previlent these days and the "gay community" seems to revil in. IF you are really a viet Nam veteran, then you are old enough to have experienced the Sexual Revolution that changed sex from a private, personal thing to a spectators' sport.

"In your face"? UP YOUR @$$!

So, you want homosexuality to be brought out into the open, to write on your job application "Homosexual"? Very well, then other people would be REQUIRED to write "I like sex with my hands tied" or "I like spankings". Is that what you want? If one sexual prefrence is made open and public, then ALL prefrences should be.

be carefull what you wish for. Once something is made law and regulation is handed over to the government, there is NO TURNING BACK, you can NEVER have your PRIVACY again!

2)"This is best accomplished by being completely outrageous. Over the top. Mean spirited. Vicious. Shrill."

So, which is it then?

I've yet to see a baby fresh from the womb clutching a rainbow flag." (rule 2)

Yep. Never will. Nor a purple stamp on the hind-er that says "gay".

But I see humor is lost the humorless. Pity. The only thing missing from your dismissive post is "tell it to the hand." Now, about that X chromosome study...you got the link for it?

Once again kids, when you respond to trolls, you give them the mistaken impression that their opinions matter.

Comments like those from the Dan Quayle imposter only damage gay rights activism.

When supposedily quoting Coulter, the imposter is only describing himself.

WRITE IN QUAYLE '08 -- READY TO EXPOUND TRUTH?

Thats some hella truthiness you got there!!!!!