« Loser Avails Himself of Safety Net | Main | Mapping Obama's World »
April 16, 2008
Environmentalists Won't Even Allow Windmills
Not even "green" energy tomfoolery like windmills can be pursued without opposition from moonbats:
The tiny, endangered Indiana bat lives on Shaffer Mountain in northeastern Somerset County and that should be enough to keep 30 big wind turbines off that ecologically sensitive Appalachian ridge, according to three environmental groups.
On behalf of their fellow bats, environmentalists will sue under the insidious Endangered Species Act. Supposedly bats, who use sonar to detect tiny flying insects as they swoop around at night pigging out on them, won't notice the 404-foot turbines — raising the danger that the bats could fly right into them, further flattening their noses.
At least Ted Kennedy wouldn't be able to see the turbines from his mansion.
Obviously any attempt to conduct human activity will be forestalled by environmentalists with their nuisance suits. Since there will be endless court battles anyway, power companies may as well stop goofing around with inefficient windmills and fight for the expanded drilling, refineries, and nuclear plants we need to grow and thrive.

On tips from General Jack D. Ripper and Lyle.
Posted by Van Helsing at April 16, 2008 9:08 AM
Comments
Will BATMAN and ROBIN be joining the protest?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2008 9:57 AM
You have just insulted that bat.
Posted by: orvict at April 16, 2008 10:17 AM
First Polar Bears, now Bats.
Us humans don't stand a chance!
And if things don't start warming up from all this global cooling caused by global warming we are all going to start canibalizing each other!
Are we considered red meat?
I have to watch my cholesterol you know.
Posted by: UCA at April 16, 2008 10:26 AM
How confusing... an Indiana bat that exists in Appalachia only? Would that be close to Indiana, PA????
Just think, if the environmentalist put the money spent on lawyers to work... relocating the bats and working on breeding them (like was done with the buffalo and other endangered species) Appalachia could have their bats and clean energy too!!! Oh wait, environmentalist moonbats aren't happy unless they can "punish mankind" when trying to solve problems in nature... correct??? Never mind!
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at April 16, 2008 10:26 AM
Is it me, or does anyone else think that that bat bears a striking resemblance to Gloria Allred?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 16, 2008 10:36 AM
When I see millions of bats flying around without smashing into each other, how hard is it for them to avoid a 400 ft. tall monstrousity? Do the windmills have some sort of Stealth radar absorbing technology built into them?
Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2008 10:39 AM
why does nancy peloski look so small in that picture?
Posted by: furballz at April 16, 2008 12:24 PM
INdeed! I used to live in a house that had a tile roof, and a bat colony lived in the roof. Access was limited to one really small hole. At daybreak, there would be a cloud, literally, around the house as the bats waited their turn to enter. Not once did I see a collision.
Posted by: Andrea Thorn at April 16, 2008 7:39 PM
Jay: Sadly, Gloria Allred's shrill chirping is in a range that's all-too-audible to humans; the bat's echo-location is much more quiet.
Posted by: PabloD at April 16, 2008 8:32 PM
Wind power is about the most realistic "green" energy out there. Look at farmers, they had those windmills pump water at least two hundred years ago (I didn't do a search, just guessing the years).
Posted by: Parker at April 16, 2008 8:52 PM
Just read your link about windmills being inefficient, yeah giant windmills "farms" are stupid, most of the time.
Posted by: Parker at April 16, 2008 8:57 PM
Next our car windshields will be squashing too many of the bees needed for polination.
Posted by: UCA at April 17, 2008 8:03 AM
PARKER
Stick a generator on one of those windmill you mention and you'll have enough electricty to power you TV set, IF the wind is blowing.
I have no problem with wind-powered generators for small-time use,(A rich family in NY state had a big, Holland-style wind generator around 1900 to charge batterys for their lights) but it's really impractical for powering even a small town.
Posted by: KHarn at April 17, 2008 3:44 PM
KHarn,
I think we are in agreement. For now it is only for limited use at best.
I do think solar or wind power will get cheap though. Until those solar photvoltaic cells go from $20,000 to support a modest house down to about $100 it wont work. Don't think it will get that cheap? Look at computers from 1980 vs. today.
Posted by: Parker at April 17, 2008 7:43 PM

