« Tax Day with Chappaquiddick Ted | Main | Barack Obama Rediscovers Flag Pins »
April 15, 2008
Brigitte Bardot on Trial in Vichy-istan
Former film star Brigitte Bardot is actually on trial for not embracing Islam. No, she did not somehow get on the wrong plane and end up in Iran; the trial is taking place in Paris.
Bardot is charged with "inciting racial hatred" for not keeping quiet about the disastrous effect Islamization is having on France. She has previously been fined four times for committing thought crimes against Islam. This time prosecutors want to hit her for $23,760 for saying:
I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country and imposing its acts.
No doubt plenty of French people agree. But they'll have to deal with their own quisling government before they have any hope of saving their country from the ongoing Muslim conquest.
On a tip from Lyle.
Posted by Van Helsing at April 15, 2008 1:45 PM
Comments
So, France has the nightly car bonfires from the youths (Muzzies) and no freedom of speach.
On a lighter note - better get a copy of this YouTube video before the Scientology Lawyers have it removed.
Television Star Exits Scientology
.....video that’s up on YouTube.
This is what he has to say: "Scientology is destructive and a rip-off."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351287,00.html
Posted by: Oiao at April 15, 2008 2:06 PM
If I were her lawyer, my opening statement would be this:
"My client has said that France is intimidated by islam and cow-tows to it's threats. If she is convicted of this charge, it will prove that her statement is true and that France is run by a bunch of COWARDLY WEENIES."
I might be fined for "contempt of court", but it would be worth it!
Posted by: KHarn at April 15, 2008 2:37 PM
I suppose by now Madam Bardot knows that most Islamists don't give a damn about animal rights.
Posted by: on-the-rocks at April 15, 2008 3:24 PM
Here is one for the:
- You asked for it, you got it - be careful what you ask for
- Oh so sad, too bad
- Well, you wanted equal treatment, deal with it
Categories.......
Some gay couples are having trouble obtaining divorces
...But the rules governing divorce are stricter. Out-of-state couples could go back to Massachusetts to get divorced, but they would have to live there for a year to establish residency first.
"I find that an unbelievably unfair burden. I own a home here, my friends are here, my life is here," said Ormiston, who is resigned to moving to Massachusetts for a year.
SO - Gays (and the other sub-categories of same or near same sex freaks) TAKE ADVANTAGE of the special perks, and bitch and moan when they have had enought with their PARTNERS and want to just move on. Now some of the freaks have to be treated just like the rest of us....ROFLMAO
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080415/ap_on_re_us/gay_divorce
Posted by: Oiao at April 15, 2008 5:33 PM
You go, BB!
Posted by: pocomoco at April 15, 2008 6:16 PM
"Oiao at April 15, 2008 5:33 PM"
Add "welcome to Grown-Up Land" to that list.
Posted by: KHarn at April 15, 2008 6:27 PM
As long as BB was showing her breasts, the French loved her.
Now that she's showing her mind, they hate her.
Today, the French are bound and determined to be the masters of their own desruction with their love affair with Islam.
They really should stick with BB.
Posted by: pocomoco at April 15, 2008 7:16 PM
What a rack!
Posted by: Anonymous at April 16, 2008 5:24 AM
Well, the 1968 protesters wanted to destroy all the archaic traditions of France. And so they have, congratulations!
See, this would happen if their spiritual siblings Obama or Clinton get control and destroy that archaic American tradition called the Constitution.
Posted by: mandy at April 16, 2008 6:13 AM
Since when do right winger bloggers give a shit about animal rights? Oh, since they can use it as a stick to bash Muslims.
Posted by: devil's advocate at April 16, 2008 7:12 AM
Animals have rights. They have the right to be my dinner.
Posted by: Farmer Ted at April 16, 2008 9:23 AM
"Since when do right winger bloggers give a shit about animal rights? Oh, since they can use it as a stick to bash Muslims."
Posted by: devil's advocate at April 16, 2008 7:12 AM
And here I thought this post was about Bardot's right to free speech being construed as "inciting racial hatred"??? I don't think it really matters that she holds the opinion that cute, fuzzy creatures shouldn't have to die to feed a woman's fancy for fur coats. She's entitled to that belief just like she should be able to voice her opinion about what Islam is doing to her country.
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at April 16, 2008 10:54 AM
Oh, you know the deal, HoosierArmyMom... when they can't find any real reason to slam us in a post, they grasp for straws. It's inconceivable to the left that we'd be concerned with anyone's right to free speech.
Posted by: monsterforge at April 17, 2008 3:52 AM
