« Eat a Whale for Gaia | Main | Weather Channel Founder John Coleman Proposes Suing Al Gore for Fraud »
March 4, 2008
Rolling Stone Still Hasn't Graduated from Junior High
The popularity of Barack Obamination's shallow leftist politics among those barely old enough to vote is unsurprising in light of the rhetoric seeping from the tween media. Check out what perpetually adolescent Rolling Stone has to say about conservatives:
All they have left to offer is this sad, dwindling, knee-jerk patriotism, a promise to keep selling world politics as a McHale's Navy rerun to a Middle America that wants nothing to do with realizing the world has changed since 1946. […] From the battering that McCain is taking lately from the likes of Limbaugh and skanky bitch-whore Ann Coulter, who vowed to campaign for Hillary if McCain gets the nomination, one wouldn't know that most of his supposed crimes were actually based on conservative principles.
Skanky bitch-whore. No doubt Rolling Stone readers regard this as sophisticated analysis, richly imbued with the nuance shunned by simplistic conservatives.
Following a risible attempt to characterize opposition to both tax cuts and border security as conservative positions, author Matt Taibbi resumes:
McCain has repeatedly displayed an inability to connect with the bloodthirsty, emotional imperatives of the Limbaugh-Hannity line of thinking, in which all nuance and pragmatism must be dismissed in favor of an all-out crush-the-demon position. […] This arrogant refusal to be a craven imbecile is what makes McCain suspect in the eyes of Limbaugh and Coulter, who are terrified at the prospect of a Republican president uninterested in book burnings.
But lest you think this moonbat is backhandedly endorsing McCain…
McCain may be even more crazy than the Republican mainstream on the issue that matters most of all: the war in Iraq and war in general. My guess is that Republican voters are not going to mind that McCain's candidacy might drive a stake through the heart of the weenie fascism of Rush and Hannity, once they figure out that the candidate is a solid bet to deliver them World War III.
We know this because
McCain's entire career has been dedicated to the idea that America must always have the right to solve its problems by force.
Enlightened liberals know that we do not have the right to resolve problems by force. Next time Muslims fly our planes full of our people into our skyscrapers full of more of our people, President Barack Hussein Obama will wisely send a nuanced letter of complaint to the United Nations and call it a day.

Hat tip: NewsBusters, on a tip from Cheetah.
Posted by Van Helsing at March 4, 2008 7:01 AM
Comments
I guess its fine to have that loudmouth racist Kanye West dressing up as Jesus Christ, but if Rolling Stone really had balls they would dress him up as the Muzzie prophet Muhammad.
Posted by: Anonymous at March 4, 2008 7:40 AM
The little tykes at Rolling Stone, fully ensconced in their sandbox since the 60s, apparently have nothing better to do than make mud pies and throw them at passersby.
The infant-terribles, and their coloring book they call Rolling Stone, have shown the sub-quality of their people as sophomoric name calling seems to be their area of expertise.
Posted by: pocomoco at March 4, 2008 8:12 AM
A rolling stone gathers no moss or IQ points.
Posted by: Anonymous at March 4, 2008 8:15 AM
Rolling Stone sucks big time. It's long since changed course from an entertainment magazine to an obnoxious, bigoted liberal rag not fit for lining the bottoms of bird cages.
It should change its title to 'Rolling Stoners,' since 99% of its readers are either dope- addled hippies or stoned college students.
They insult, stereotype and demonize Republicans and Christians every chance they get.
They have run an article written by and from the perspective of a Muslim terrorist in Iraq about his struggles, yet I've never seen them run an article by, say, a Christian minister talking about why he thinks abortion is wrong.
They demonize those who fight for morality, while once writing a lengthy article singing the praises of a teenage boy who successfully supervised the shipment of several truckloads of pot over a certain distance.
They include a huge article by the Goracle about his acolytes who helped to spread the fear and paranoia of global warming, and gave a huge, months- long blowjob of Live Earth, while ignoring how much environmental damage was undoubtedly done as a result of that stupid concert.
What a pathetic rag.
Posted by: Adam at March 4, 2008 8:45 AM
Ann Coulter is a skanky whore? Pretty funny coming from the left, who have defined and refined the art of sleaze and promiscuity for decades.
Posted by: ent at March 4, 2008 9:17 AM
If they can't make a logical argument against Ann Coulter, what else is there but to resort to name calling. If they called her smart mouthed, arrogant and over-bearing, there would be some accuracy that even Ann would own up to, but no... let's use the middle school tactic and start call her "nasty names"!!! I have no more use for Rolling Stone than I would for a Sears catalog in an outhouse!
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at March 4, 2008 11:15 AM
Skanky bitch-whore? This idiot must be recalling his marriages to street walkers in order to come up with such a characterization.
K West as Jesus Christ?
Do people really pay money for this rag?
Posted by: Fiberal at March 4, 2008 12:07 PM
So, all of the Print writers from the NYToons are defecting to rags like this, as the NYToons ship sinks.................
Posted by: Oiao at March 4, 2008 4:04 PM
Calling Ann Coulter a skanky bitch-whore is an insult to all skanky bitch-whores.
VOTE QUAYLE '08 -- YOUR ONLY TRUE CONSERVATIVE CHOICE
Posted by: Dan Quayle at March 4, 2008 5:01 PM
Rolling Stone Still Hasn't Graduated from Junior High
And this surprises someone? Rolling Stone is required reading for those having a particularly difficult and protracted adolescence.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 4, 2008 8:36 PM
Uh oh... something stinky lurks nearby...
Posted by: monsterforge at March 4, 2008 10:14 PM
Geez, I guess you guys haven't been reading it long enough. I started back when they folded the thing in two. They once declared Charles Manson "Man of the Year" because the Establishment was just harassing him.
Posted by: Teri Pittman at March 5, 2008 7:50 PM
Heh-heh. We wingbats are SO funny. We get to make up facts and pass them off as truths.
Rolling Stone never declared Charles Manson "Man of the Year". That was the revolutionary magazine Tuesday's Child that did that.
But that doesn't stop us wingbats from painting anyone who disagrees with us with our pail of shit. And, man, do we have a deep pail.
That's what I love about this site. We can spew hate without any fear of reprocussion.
Heh-heh.
WRITE IN QUAYLE '08 -- AMERICA DON'T FAIL ME AGAIN
Posted by: Dan Quayle at March 6, 2008 9:33 AM

