« Rebecca Aguilar Canned | Main | Relatives Suing over Drunken Fool Drowning »

Recall! Recall! Recall!

Time for this traitor to GO!

Umm...I wonder if this moronic judge realises she can be removed from the bench for what she did. At the very least she denied this young man his 1st and 9th Amendment Rights.

It already does control the Whitehouse, and has done since Woodrow Wilson.

That thing needs the sh*t slapped out of it. It's worse than worthless - it's dangerous.

A stinking liberal's role model.

And the empty scrotum bastards wonder why conservatives hold them in such utter contempt.

This war would be over by now if it weren't for the f***ing moonbats obstructing the war effort! Weather they mean to or not, they are PROLONGING the islamic war through their actions, just as they did for the Viet Nam war!

Obviously noone has denied her a fourth trip to the buffet.

"If you'd resent it, it MUST be good.
Posted by: hashfanatic at March 6, 2008 1:29 AM"

Remember this post folks, it sums up Leftie insanity.
I'm going to repost it every time hash and his crew post so as to remind everyone that they haven't a rational thought in their heads.

KHarn - your call.

Personally, I'm in ignore mode. Seems to bore them to the point that they just cruze over to YouTube and wach another Osama Obama pep speech.

She's as smart as she is pretty.

Tsk, tsk, V the K.

You shouldn't make fun of the gross, fat, ugly, bitch-pig's looks.

After all - I'm sure she has a heart of pure shit.

I wonder if she resented the recruiters for the Union Army.

"At the very least she denied At the very least she denied this young man his 1st and 9th Amendment Rights."

Ridiculous.

"...this young man his 1st and 9th Amendment Rights..."

FAIL.

He is not a "young man" yet. He's still a kid in the eyes of the law, which is why we have controls on this sort of thing.

Seventeen? That makes it WORSE, you clowns. That means he's chomping at the bit to kill, yet doesn't have the judgement or maturity to understand it's one lousy year he needs to wait.

There's seriously something mentally defective with you chickenhawks for WANTING this kid in harm's way before he's even old enough to make the choice for himself.

Are American lives so cheap to you, that you begrudge this justice the authority she possesses, to rule on the side of safety and responsibility rather than your idiotic Rambo-fed conceptions of what life, honor, and duty encompass?

For shame, all of you.

Jay - she's a racist who resents ANYTHING white.

"post-traumatic slavery disorder" says it all.

Who is worse - the drug dealer or the druggie?
Who was worse - the seller of humans or the user?

The stoopid bitch could know someone who knows someone who knows someone who may have been the actual decendant of a real live (er... dead for 100 years) slave - who was sold into slavery by a black african chief.

Liberal = hypocrite.

Fat pig = fat pig.

Are American lives so cheap to you, that you begrudge this justice the authority she possesses, to rule on the side of safety and responsibility rather than your idiotic Rambo-fed conceptions of what life, honor, and duty encompass?

Listen up you asstard, that young man has every right to determine his own future. Its no different than if he became manumitted from his parents. Its his life and his livelihood and for him to determine, you socialist fuckoff. What the fuck happened to 'Don't cram your morality down my throat'? Its convenient for shitbags like you to spout that, but fuck no it ain't alright for someone else who may hold a different point of view to do so.

Psssst - BRL - hashpussy is retarded. You're wasting your keyboard - it has no reason beyond that of a cedar fence post.

It doesn't think, therefore it isn't.

If you held a conversation with a concrete block you would be better entertained and more mentally challenged than sparring with a lunatic.

The news is that hash recognizes the concept of shame.

Learn something every day.

I see the local nutcase has emerged from it's lair again. It's mother must be "occupied" with another paying customer.

Anyways, I had a principal who decided I was "wasting my potential" when I decided to enlist. So she decided to keep denying my last few credits I needed to graduate. This went on for a week as i kept getting new assignments to complete before she would give them to me. Finally i called the recruiter. He told me not to worry about it, it would be taken care. The next she called me in and informed me I had my credits. I found out right before I shipped that the Recruiting Battalion Sergeant-Major had called ripped her a new one. This was back in the '90s so I'm sure it's gotten worse now.

Let's clear up this entire "feeding the trolls" approach.

One of the greatest minds the human race has ever known was a Hebrew King who lived hundreds of years before Christ our Lord.

He is, even today, renowned for his unsurpassed wisdom. His wisdom is recognized by all thinking humans (including agnostics and atheists). His name was Solomon.

Solomon wrote a book called ‘Proverbs’ which is part of both Jewish and Christian scripture, and studied by seculars as well. Much of the book could be titled “Dealing with Fools for Dummies.”

In the book, Solomon warns against debating fools (dipshits) but encourages the wise to rebuke them. In a nutshell, he told us that we are obligated to call a dipshit a dipshit, but debating them reduces us to their level of foolery.

You cannot reason with someone who lacks capacity for reason. You can, however, tell them they are, in fact, fools (dipshits). It’s expected.

And that is your lesson for the evening.

Hashfanatic - you are the model 'fool' of which Solomon speaks. You are a shit-eating idiot.

And that's all I have to say about that. :-)

Jimbo, what you say is true, but understand, the fact you are referring to anything religious, will cause any liberal to refute your words. It's like trying to convince an atheist there is a God, by using the Bible.

"Its his life and his livelihood and for him to determine, you socialist fuckoff."

Not quite...Hint Number One should have been that a judge had to rule on the question!

(But, then again, there is reality, there are laws, and then there is moonbattery.com, where a scorched-earth mentality and violence at any cost, for no particular reason, are always in style!)

It's hysterically funny how some of you are so bitterly opposed to a woman's right to choose, yet, so, SO hungry to see an underaged kid's blood spilled in your hundred-year-jihad and the military-industrial complex meatpuppet slaughterhouse that was your only possibility and only chance at gainful, "productive" employment!.

I guess it's another case of "Save the fetus, then drop the brat on it's head, once it's born?"

The kid is not legally of age to make his choices yet (and is obviously not of sound mind), the judge was encharged with responsibility to dispense her judgement in the case, and she did.

End of story.

Get used to rationality and decency once more being the order of the day.

Bonzo is dead.

Whoooo-eeeee! Stinks in here. Who farted? I smell a fool.

Remember, Jimbo.

The more you ignore me, the closer I get...

Oooooo! He's soooo scary! Hide, Jimbo!!!!

I am hiding, Monster.

I hope it doesn't find out that I live at 204 Kapahulu, Honolulu, HI. I would be REALLY scared if it knew where I lived.

I wonder what the dipshit's address is? :-)

Be careful. Scottymac--I mean hashfanatic is a Truther. He and his army of secret society shadow ninjas will get you if you give him your addy.

It's hysterically funny how some of you are so bitterly opposed to a woman's right to choose, yet, so, SO hungry to see an underaged kid's blood spilled in your hundred-year-jihad and the military-industrial complex meatpuppet slaughterhouse that was your only possibility and only chance at gainful, "productive" employment!.

Assclown, I'm not the one defending a system that treats another human being as a piece of chattel (thats a slave for your underdeveloped brain, Hash). Just remember Hash, Dred Scott and Roe did the same thing: declare someone a 'non-person' in the name of 'individual choice'. So take your bong and cram it up your ass, you arrogant fucktard.

Jay Guevara, were you born that stupid or did you have to WORK at it?

He wanted to enlist on the DELAYED entry program and serve his country, something I'm sure you're clueless about.

To bad your daddy didn't practice delayed entry and early pullout.

"Conan in Iraq at March 9, 2008 6:45 AM"

I think you were directing your post towards HASFANATIC, not Jay.

Hash's argument in a nutshell:

"If you'd resent it, it MUST be good.
Posted by: hashfanatic at March 6, 2008 1:29 AM"

"I wonder if she resented the recruiters for the Union Army.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 8, 2008 7:31 PM"

Interesting point Jay. JEB Stuart showed up here in 1863 and "knocked" on the courthouse door with a cannon and burned a bunch of stuff down. Too bad there weren't any moonbats around, or they could have dialoged with him.

Anyway, the Union army put a stop to him and rest of Lee's army a few days later down in Gettysburg.

Throw any puppies today, conan?

Given any thought to all those little kids being indoctrinated as suicide bombers today, hash?

I have no interest in lowering my own nation's moral standards to the level of such lands, Ian.

Do you?

I wouldn't know. My nation doesn't exist any more.

For shame, all of you.

Posted by: hashfanatic at March 8, 2008 8:02 PM

To demonstrate the hypocrasy of a libtard I give you the hashmark hit parade commentary.

1) Tell us about your "Christian Zionism", stevie!

2) Right back at you, you filthy limey bastard.

3) No, for as far as I am concerned, there is no justification for your existence.

4) Hosermom, the gunman was actually killed by one of these little Kahanist darlings and if you believe that any of these smellies was actually
unarmed, you are as hopelessly naive as much as you are typically stupid and unrepentently evil.

5) Don't like the truth, hosermom? Hopefully God will ensure a few of your imaginary "Islamofascists" are sawing away at your widdle brat's neck this very minute... You miserable, worthless whore.

A man who doesn't know anything about anyone and just simply spews hatred and ignorance doesn't know any shame and is quite the hipocrite to be "trying to shame others".

And, I would add,such a person is unworthy of being responded to. The only diffeence between HF/HFjr and a monkey flinging his own feces is that the monkey smells better.

Why would someone call themself an ass fanatic anyway?

You have to wonder about those fudge-packers.

Hash's a real piece of work. He and his buddies on the truther sites all get together and yack about how the evil Powers That Be will take over and make some kind of New World Order. He thinks we're sheep who fall in line because we don't know better, and he loathes us for it. He's scared of the Jews because he thinks they're behind it all. They get together and call us "the enemy" and plot how they are going to start a revolution and take over. He's trying to sow seeds of discontent and fear. It's a classic psychological warfare tactic that people use to disarm their enemies. This is where the random, really venomous stuff comes from. Paranoia is a powerful motivator.

"monsterforge at March 9, 2008 2:11 PM"

You forgot to add that his kind think that the Bush "brownshirts" will drag them off to the gulags and that makes them feel oh, so brave in their struggle. But when that never happens to them or anyone else, they panic with the realisation that they are living a lie and start spewing even worse abuse, hoping that someone will call them "traitors" and justify their fantasy of "US oppression".

With all due respect, if you were inside the EU watching your nation states dissolve into a supranationalist sludge, you'd be a little less skeptical of the New World Order.

Perspective moment: the average age of enlistment in the British Armed Forces is 17. Legal age of majority - when you can join up, amongst other things - is 16. This "kid" may be a child in the eyes of the law but on the provided evidence he is probably better equipped to make decisions than this judge ever will be.

Or hashfan, for that matter...

Wonderful point, well stated Archonix.

Wow. What started as comments on Court Commissioner Mackel's decision dissinetgrated into a mash bash mighty quickly. I wanted to say that I was a white foster parent of a black child, who due to Mackel's wise decisions, am now the adoptive mother of said child. I doubt she is anti-white or any kind of bigot. I sat in her court room many many times and was always impressed with how she thought out her decisions based on what was best for each child. I'm ready to read the abuse that will probably be heaped on me due to this; I respect and admire Commissioner Mackel.

I sat in her court room many many times and was always impressed with how she thought out her decisions based on what was best for each child.

And if that's the case, fine. Then it's her responsibility to say why joining the DEP is not in this kid's best interest, based on law. The problem is that in this case she seems to have allowed her personal opionions about the Iraq war influence her decision, possibly costing Shawn Sage $10,000.

Eric, you beat me to the punch. The whole point of being a judge is to make decisions based of evidence and facts, not on your personal opinions. Mackel seemed to make her decision based not out of concern or fear for the kid's well being, but rather out of her own feelings about the Iraq war.

With all due respect, if you were inside the EU watching your nation states dissolve into a supranationalist sludge, you'd be a little less skeptical of the New World Order.

Yea, I've gotta agree with Ian on this point.

But who was it addressed to?

And, are not the Bush Crime Family and the Republican establishment in actuality promoting evil schemes like the North American Union, the Amero, and one-world government concepts like open borders and unfettered free trade themselves?

I am assuming that Ian is referring to England and, yes, that country's descent into forced multiculturalism and loss of it's national and cultural character is a tragedy, but how exactly is the American right and the Republicans' "New World Order" nightmare exactly going to restore national sovereignity to European homelands when it has done nothing to prevent the decay so far, and has in fact hastened its spread?

Wouldn't individualized European nationalist activism in direct opposition to neocon globalist interests serve the individual peoples of Europe's sovereign nations and distinct cultures far more effectively than looking to America's so-called "gorgeous mosaic", when we cannot even secure our own borders and rein in our own illegal aliens and criminals?

I understand it is borne out of fear and desperation but this way of thinking makes no sense to me.

Hash, the problem is, when nationalist movements try to get started people like you call them fascist and have them beaten up.

Archonix, that's ridiculous. Just because you meet opposition doesn't mean the majority is necessarily against you.

When the musician Morrissey picked up and left England and pulled no punches about the cultural shifts and the invasion that caused him to leave, I didn't hear him denounced as a fascist.

It's not just England, either.

In Ireland, there is widespread disgruntlement of Polish "ethnic" aisles in Irish supermarkets, much like our Spanish ones here....nobody's going to get far calling the Irish "fascist" or even "commie" for voicing long-suppressed frustrations.

I understand Oslo now has increases in crime that are four times that of New York, because of unfettered immigration and the nationals forced to accept "world" ideas of what is acceptable or not.

I see much guff being spoken here about the "Minutemen", but very little lasting histrionics toward them...

So, how are the nations to survive and preserve their nationality, if not for nationalist activism, as politically incorrect as it may seem?

My point is, don't look to the US or any "New World Orders" to help you out, because it's not your sovereignity they are out to preserve in the first place.

Its interesting to see the ignorant and badly educated presuming to lecture about things which they really cannot grasp but parading their "feelings" about as if this constitutes knowledge or reasoned debate. Its really too funny. Sort of like listening to one of Osama braying sessions "yes we can!"

Its obvious that some people have more than a passing knowledge of crime families and the correctional system.

Tom-Boy, you're the one who uses five dozen words to say absolutely nothing at all.

"If you'd resent it, it MUST be good.
Posted by: hashfanatic at March 6, 2008 1:29 AM"

OK Here is her phone number AND email address do NOT let this stuff continue without protest and I mean PROTEST!!
mmackel@yahoo.com

Phone: (213) 974-5401
Fax: (213) 621-7952

Yes! Excellent idea!

Harass a female black Supreme Court Commissioner, based in Los Angeles, by telephone, and over the internet!

She'll be SURE to reverse her decision, then!

Brilliant! Man those phones, boys....

lol

Eric and Conservativeteen, thank you for not blasting me. I think perhaps you are formulating your opinions only on what you have read in the newspapers or heard on talk radio. Yes, by what we learn from these sources, it does SEEM like Mackel based her decision on her personal feelings about the war. Please understand that she serves in Family Court, where she can not, by law, comment on her decisions in public, as that would be considered a violation of the minors right to privacy. She is not, however, barred from expressing her personal opinions on subjects of relavence. Nor are we.
The minor in this case had the opportunity to have Mackel's decision appealed within 30 days.
I don't know if he did or not, but it SEEMS he wanted to have his case heard in the public sqare, which he has. I wish this could happen without disparaging a Commissioner who was voted onto the bench in 2002 and has been charged with making thousands upon thousands of decisions. By the way, did you read about Mackel's previous jobs? She was a social worker, a parole officer, and a Court Referee before she was a Commissioner. I think she has earned her position of authority. Cyndy

As I said before, she may be a wonderful person in all other respects. Please understand how it looks though. The kid's foster parents supported his enlistment. I posted a story above about another government beuracrat who almost cost me a fairly decent enlistment bonus.
On top of her known opposition to the war she seems to have all sorts of connections to several far left groups. Frankly I don't think a judge should be allowed to be a member of any polotical organization, right or left. What really bothers me, and i think most conservatives, is that we have another judge basing her decision on a far-left agenda rather than doing her job. It's really emblamatic of the Culture War at large, with a 17 year old kid caught in the crossfire.

If you wanted to "serve your country" (snort!) so badly, why did you need to be enticed with extra, unearned bonuses?

Why should my ADDITIONAL tax dollars go toward ATTRACTING you to participate in actions that I am vehemently opposed to in the first place?

Welcome to white boy's welfare, kid.

As a foster parent, I will vouch that 80% of the social workers I've met are complete idiots. Including the one that told me that lying and stealing were "part of Mexican culture."

"As a foster parent, I will vouch that 80% of the social workers I've met are complete idiots. Including the one that told me that lying and stealing were "part of Mexican culture.""

Agreed, and that percentage may be higher in my neck of the woods...

At least here, it appears to be getting better on that front.

As you know, anyone can accuse anyone else of anything, especially when there are no repercussions for the accuser. Is Mackel really left wing? Is she really the contact person or even a member of the organizations she has been rumored to be? Who knows. What I do know is, foster kids have their own set of really tough issues, and the longer they are in foster care, the more compound the problems. Foster kids get bounced from worker to worker and family to family far to often, but they keep the same commissioner through-out. It's probable that Mackel has this kid on her docket since he was 12 years old. And who knows how long he was in out of home care before that. Or why he was removed from home? Cases come up for review at least every 6 months. Mackel knows his whole history; she can't tell anyone, but she knows.
It may be that she knows he exceptionally immature (he IS quoted as saying that he wanted to join the Marines since he saw the movie "Full Metal Jacket".) She would be the one to know about any possible mental health issues, not a recruiter (who certianly has his own agenda). As for his foster parents supporting his decision, they know he is ageing out of the system. There is no support system in place for kids in his position, they are basically on their own, and the service can SEEM like any easy out when there seems to be no where else to go. Time will tell how this young man fares. I hope the publicity this case received will be to his ultimate benefit. I wish him well. I wish Commissioner Mackel well too.

To Who It May Concern:

I surprisingly agree with Commission Mackel in her final dicsion to not to allow Shawn Sage to join the Marine Corp under the age of 18 years of age, depite the fact that my case CK69834 is presently in her court room 402, and we a lot of the times don't see eye to eye.
I strongly agree that the marine recuiters are nothing more than money hungry salesmen, wanting to recuit teenagers to live out brokens promises of stardom, fame and fortune that is pushed like a cheap Hollywood movie. Let's get real poeple- why would Commissioner Mackel want to sign a child off to war. so that he or she would be in harms way of losing his or her own life.I don't think so.
Commissioner Mackel's job is to protect our children from being taken off to a Fantasy Land. Plus, if she were to sign off, thereafter, every recuiter would be in her court asking for more of our young people to go to war.And I for one along with Commissioner Mackel stand together.
I also agree with the bailiff, I am not sure which one, that shared his story about his son.
So everyone including the Marine recuiter needs to stop critizing Mackel's protective decision. If this teenager really wants to join the marine he can do so on his own when he's 18 years old.
Everyone needs to stop over reacting to the right decision that was handed up.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of negative respones. But I wonder if the ones who are over-reacting have children of their own like I do?

Sincerely

Ray Travis
rayrayray007@yahoo.coms