« Selective Lessons | Main | Palestinian Illegal Immigrant Sues NYPD »
March 31, 2008
Fatuous Moonbat Slogan of the Day
In honor of Cesar Chavez day, Phoenix refused to pick up my garbage, and a moonbat at Bowling Green State University stood around holding this sign:
The people of Tibet will be glad to hear that the Dalai Lama's approach must have worked after all. Say, why didn't we try using nonviolence to defend ourselves on 9/11?
Compliments of Sean M.
Posted by Van Helsing at March 31, 2008 8:23 PM
Comments
Right on, SeanM.
Those non-violence people are failures.
Mohandas Gandhi = Failire
Martin Luther King Jr. = Failure
Nelson Mandela = Failure
Jesus of Nazereth = Failure
Yes, the only way to prevent violence is lobbing cruise missles. They understand that. And invading countries that have already disarmed. And calling it a "Crusade". And torture.
That's what America is about, baby.
"Love thine enemy", indeed.
Iraq = 52nd State = Free Oil
WRITE IN QUAYLE '08 -- YOUR ONLY TRUE CONSERVATIVE CHOICE
Posted by: Dan Quayle at March 31, 2008 8:39 PM
At least Jesus came back to life, natch.
Posted by: BUUUUURRRRNING HOT at March 31, 2008 8:50 PM
Jesus fights to win!
Anyone who disagrees gets a fatwa from my Glock 9mm.
Posted by: Who's yer Army Dad? at March 31, 2008 9:13 PM
Catchy slogan...
sorta like
IF AL-QUEDA CHOPS MY HEAD OFF, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE BECAUSE I'VE GOT NOTHING TO LOSE
Posted by: Texan at March 31, 2008 9:14 PM
Looks like a good slogan for the Miami Dophins.
Posted by: Jimbo at March 31, 2008 9:17 PM
If you liked that one, take a look at this too:
The Ultimates: ‘A’ Doesn’t Stand For France
I tell ya, Mark Millar is a closet Republican hawk.
Posted by: BUUUUURRRRNING HOT at March 31, 2008 10:34 PM
Posted by: BUUUUURRRRNING HOT at March 31, 2008 10:38 PM
???????????
Fine, just the raw linkage then:
http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/the-ultimates-a-doesnt-stand-for-france/
Posted by: BUUUUURRRRNING HOT at March 31, 2008 10:43 PM
The bastards didn't pick up my trash either.
Look...we ALREADY have a day for guys like Cesar Chavez...it's called LABOR DAY.
Why don't we just get it the hell over with here in Cali, and give us May 1 off as well...
How does that sound, Comrades?
Posted by: Nigel at April 1, 2008 12:35 AM
Those non-violence people are failures.
Nelson Mandela = Failure
Liberals are self-parody: the leader of the military wing of the ANC who has admitted to authorizing a bombing that killed civilians is "non-violent"?
Next you'll tell us his wife Winnie, who once backed the barbaric practice of burning people alive by placing a gasoline filled tire around their neck is sainted.
Posted by: xantl at April 1, 2008 1:07 AM
America should have gone the nonviolent route during WW II? Then America would likely be carved with the western US being controlled by the Empire of Japan and the east being under Nazi Germany's control. Then again at least we wouldnt have any whiny liberals around since they would have been sent to extermination camps.
Likewise today with radical Islam, lets just surrender and see how the whiny atheist liberals react as their women are forced into Burqa's or stoned and their mens heads chopped off for refusing to convert to Islam.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 1, 2008 4:36 AM
If not for non-pacifists, pacifists would be extinct
Posted by: JamesB at April 1, 2008 5:41 AM
There is no such thing as the United States without violence.
I wonder how well a non-violent approach would have worked for George and the boys back in the day. Somethign tells me, "not so much."
Non-violent approaches can be effective, but most of the time the intent of such an approach is to get yourself to look like a victim in order to create a cause; You basically let yourself be bullied.
Posted by: Ben Huh at April 1, 2008 6:15 AM
"There is no such thing as the United States without violence."
This post is especially funny since it was published on Cesar Chavez's birthday.
Posted by: Who's yer Army Dad? at April 1, 2008 9:49 AM
This reminds me of those "If you want peace, work for justice" bumper stickers. Tell me, what injustice was it that caused Hitler to invade Poland (and the rest of Europe)? Did Hussein invade Kuwait because the Kuwaitis were unfair to him? When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, what were the injustices that we had committed against them? And on and on.
Liberals reason by slogan ... if it has a nice ring to it, then it must be true.
No War for Oil!
Posted by: ent at April 1, 2008 11:56 AM
Ent,
I think you have it bass ackward, son.
If the German people had demanded justice for its Jewish population and for the Poles, Hitler wouldn't have obtained the power he did.
If the Iraqi people had demanded justice from their leadership, Saddam wouldn't have risen to power. If the U.S. had applied its principles of justice, rather than arming Saddam in his war against Iran, he wouldn't have cemented his leadership.
If the Japanese people had demanded justice from their leadership instead of giving blind obedience to the emperor, the attach on Pearl Harbor wouldn't have happened.
If the citizens of Judea had demanded justice from Pontius Pilate, Jesus would not have been crucified and the murderer Barrabas killed instead.
The people you suggest, those who are attacked, desire justice but aren't in a position to effect justice. It's the enablers, those who empower the opressors (or look the other way) who must demand justice, for they are the only ones who can effect justice.
Whether you praise the pig, worship the pig from afar, or ignore the pig entirely, it's all the same to the pig.
Posted by: Mike Huckabee at April 1, 2008 12:25 PM
My dad once told me about how "May Day" was celibrated in America in the thirties. But in later years, the COMMUNISTS hijacked it as "their" holliday and now, May first is just another day in the US, sometimes it's a day to be DREDDED, because the commies, anarchists and assorted idiots will often come out in packs and raise he//.
Posted by: KHarn at April 1, 2008 2:14 PM
KHarn,
You're off topic here.
And didn't you get banned from this site for racist comments?
Posted by: Who's yer Army Dad? at April 1, 2008 5:10 PM
why would this site ban him for rascist comments? This site encourages rascist comments! In fact it's because of his rascist comments that he's kept around.
He should be banned for clearly lacking even a third grade education.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 2, 2008 5:35 AM
why would this site ban him for rascist comments? This site encourages rascist comments! In fact it's because of his rascist comments that he's kept around.
He should be banned for clearly lacking even a third grade education.
Irony.
Posted by: xantl at April 2, 2008 10:39 AM
"Who's yer Army Dad? at April 1, 2008 5:10 PM"
I may be off-topic. I was direting the comment to Nigel:
"Why don't we just get it the hell over with here in Cali, and give us May 1 off as well..."
Dan Quail "banned" me, calling an honest truth I posted "racist". As you can see, he has no authority, Doesn't Van Helsing run this site? Dan was the only objection I read, not counting "Anonymous'" sneering comment on April 2, 2008 at 5:35 AM, so I doubt that anyone else found my comment 'racist'.
Danny-Boy, I have been accused of "racism" simply because I was born in the South, yet it has yet to be PROVED. "Racist" has become the standard retort of a Liberal when he has nothing to back up his accusations.
I'm not impressed.
Posted by: KHarn at April 2, 2008 5:33 PM
