« Profiles in Countermoonbattery: Matthew Lee | Main | Hard Left Politics in Tucson Public Schools »

Who published this mess?
How did it make the shelves to begin with?

Great, teaching the civil war is being pulled from American History because of the racial tension, but some people think bringing positive attention to homosexual activity is appropriate.

You think if there were a book out about a guy who quit the gay lifestyle, settled down, got married, and had a happy satisfying family life... would it win any awards? Would it make any public school reading lists? Would it even be published?

Uh, V, the answer is no. A long time ago I sent a post about "movies you will never see." I know you are talking about a book, but that movie would never get made either.

These " aberrant penguins" are not alone. In Germany there is 3 pairs of homosexual penguins too, they have rejected to leave their partners when the zoo tried to introduce a new female penguins. Zoo Director Heike Kueck said: "The relationships were apparently too strong."

Homosexual behavior is reported in more than 450 animal species all around the world. The list includes bears, gorillas, flamingos...

Carlos! Long time no see! We missed you on the Massachusetts pederast thread.

Homosexual behavior is reported in more than 450 animal species all around the world. The list includes bears, gorillas, flamingos...

I didn't know homosexuals had relations with bears, gorillas, and flamingos. Anything that moves slowly enough to catch up to, eh? You sly devils!

Well, carlos's dating opportunities have just expanded by 450%.

Party! Party!

Btw, Carlos, here's the link to the thread cited above: Gay Massachusetts Official Carl Stanley McGee Assaults Young Boy.

Might as well publish a book about a nice preist and his little choir boys doing an orgy. And it can be done in Dr. Suess style. That would be published before homosexual renouncing his sin and going strait.

After all, one good sin deserves another. heh?

Jay,

I guess if I look for "heterosexual" and "assaults " in google, I am going to find some things too, unfortunately. I think this drives to nowhere.

Really do you want to talk that about?

Just out of curiosity; how many of those 450 species eat their young? How many are predators? Is the animal world to become a justification for human behavior?

450 species, eh? Well, I guess we're outvoted. Animals go to war, why seek peace? Animals kill and eat their young, Swift was right. Why have a moral code if you can point to an animal species to justify any behavior?
I see how the reports are exploited; how do scientists explain it?

Really do you want to talk that about?

You bet I do. The point is not the existence of a phenomenon, but its incidence. And the incidence of the kind of crap detailed in the news item is sufficiently high that a word - pederasty - was coined specifically to refer to it.

The human behaviour is not an example for the animals.
We do have a moral code, but we do not care about the people dying for starvation or sickness each minute, we do business with countries where female babies are killed because of their traditions, we do have factories where arms are manufactured and selled to countries at war obtaining big benefits.
But yes, we do have a moral code concerning the dangerous gay people, we can be proud of ourselves because we are a moral species.

Jay,

That word was coined specifically to discriminate and emphasize the crime (again the moral code), the incidence of the heterosexual abuse is very superior.

It was coined to permit reference to a perversion without having to engage either in elaborate circumlocution or to resort to blunt Anglo-Saxon.

There is no circumlocution, it is just the same heterosexual perversion but emphasizing the "homosexual".

Nope. Men bonking teenage girls is a social no-no, but not a biological one. As soon as a girl turns 18.001 years of age, she's legal, and sex is natural and normal. It's how we all got here. Queering off is another matter entirely, and is both a social and a biological no-no, just as, e.g., necrophilia is, and for the same reason: the yuck factor. Opprobrium attaches to perversions that undermine society precisely because they undermine society.

"...we do business with countries where female babies are killed because of their traditions..."

You mean MUSLIMS, don't you carlos? SAY IT, YOU COWARD!

Carlos - how goes it, dude...

Back to your first post in this thread...

Seriously, aren't ALL flamingos gay????

carlos, you apparently don't know the full story of Roy and Silo...

Roy & Silo - Why Gay Penguins Are NOT a Good Example for Homosexuality

To summarize, Silo left his gay partner for a FEMALE after being held captive in a males-only environment and indoctrinated into prison shower sex for years.

So much for a happily ever after FAIRY tale eh? Lol!

Carlos,

You really want to help out the starving people in foreign countries? Join the military or the Republican party. Start donating to a Christian church that sends aid to places like Darfur. Bush is in Africa right now providing aid for people in Liberia and Tanzania by funding a program that will provide netting and medicine to fight malaria. A baby dies in Africa every 30 seconds due to malaria, and we are cutting that number in half by saving millions of children.

Props to the Republicans!

What are the libs doing?

I don't believe I said "the dangerous gay people" nor did I say we're a moral species. Having a moral code doesn't mean that we're a moral species. It means we recognize the failings of our (human)race and look to an exemplar of the best we can be. I thought that obvious.
As to your unfounded inference of homophobia...say, just what is it with the unholy trinity of "sexist-racist-homophobic!" that comes so readily from the left? Is that like making some warding sign against the evil eye? Or in this case an opposing opinion. Dangerous? No. Misguided, yes: to think that everyone will love and accept homosexual behavior once marriage is redefined; even if the constitution had to be bastardized to do it.

Jay,

The problem is not the sexual orientation of the offender, but the abuse itself and the feeling of vulnerability of the victim of that abuse. To consider the thin line of the biological in men abusing girls being less perverse than men abusing boys, is a dangerous thinking that would be rejected in any court of law. Any abuse undermine the society. It is the caused damage and the age of the victim what determines the level and graveness of the abuse, not the sexual orientation. We have to pay attention to the facts, not to our moral opinion about the fact.

Jimbo,

Watch the skies, a gang of gay flamingos can be stalking you at this very moment!

Jay,

For people born with an homosexual sexual orientation - same sex sex is 100% natural and normal. Believe me.

Hetersosexual men rape women and molest little girls - gay men do not.

You JUST DO NOT GET IT do you. You are so consumed with the discomfort you feel about 2 men having sex - something that does not appeal to you b/c you are heterosexual - that you can't see beyond that. Guess what - just b/c there is nothing "in it" for you does not make it wrong.

The world does not revolve around you. Get used to that idea b/c gay men and women are NOT going away. Just like heterosexuals aren't either. It is not political or religious - it is biological. A small percenatge of people are born with an homosexual sexual orientation. You don't like that? Too bad.

Lee,
Homosexuality is a sexual CHOICE. I know I know those libby skull-jockeys say that it's born into a person. What I don't understand is how can a once homosexual turn into a heterosexual and a heterosexual become homosexual? That's not something that the person is born with. It's a sexual choice they make themselves.

Farmer Ted,

Homosexuality is a sexual orientation a person is born with - s small percentage.

People do not change their sexual orientation - they can not act on it - lie about it - do it in secret, deny it, etc. That is what you are talking about.

A person does NOT choose to be sexually and romantically attracted to the same sex.
They CAN choose not to act on it or lie about it or deny it.

Lee,
So what you're saying is that homosexuals that choose to become heterosexuals and heteros that choose to become homosexuals are liars?

burning,

The zoo tried that many times, and only after 6 years they get succesful, still I do not understand why the zoo had the neccessity to change a homosexual behaviour to another more convenient heterosexual one. Well, I guess it is a mirror of the own human neccessity.
But do not worry, burning, still there is another 3 male/male couples of birds and a 1 female/female of penguins in that zoo, as well as the penguins in Germany too.

Carlos,
Maybe that one penquin changed it's mind. Just like people do about their sexuality.