« Moonbats Urge Us to Eat Bugs and Roadkill | Main | Godwin's Law in Action »

Women with machine guns are a real turn on. I remember falling in love with Jennifer Grey and Lea Thompson in RED DAWN after I saw those 2 firing AK-47s.

Meanwhile, Momma Moonbat is in Egypt, protesting on behalf of radical Islamists.

I fankly find your commentary on Ms. Shaw to be extremely pharisaical. Ms. Shaw entered the Symbionese Liberation Army as a kidnap victim. Through months of torment she was terrorized from thinking outside the mental box her kidnappers operated in. Ms. Shaw was just an innocent with the wrong name at the wrong place.

Generally kidnap victims have not been charged with the crimes directed by their kidnappers. In the Stede Bonnet pirate case in Charleston South Carolina in October 1718 the pirate captain Stede Bonnet was hanged while the three sailors he kidnapped into his pirate crew were set free. There are plenty of other such precedents.

Revolutionaries? How about Lenny Weinglass, terorist lawyer extroadinaire?

Congrats to her and her dog for reaching that level in an extremely tough competition.

So, we're against pardons, right?

No Republican should be punished for the treasonist act of revealing a CIA agent's identity. (Good thing, since all indications are that Cheney and Rove were on the front lines of this intimidation tactic!)

I see that Bush is pushing for (and the Senate is complying with) retroactive immunitity for the telecom companies for violating Fourth Amendment privacy rights in turning over American's phone records. Are we TRUE CONSERVATIVES for that pardon or against it?

Iraq = 52nd State = Free Oil

Vote Quayle '08

Hey Anon, While this YouTube clip is not the actual music video by The Cramps, here's "Bikini Girls with Machine Guns"

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-BDhiDgk-zM

I like the one at 00:32

Dan, You Overgrown FratBoy Potatoe head

So, YOU are against pardons, right?
No AMERICAN should want Border Agents RAMOS AND COMPEAN punished for shooting a DRUG SMUGGLER. (Good thing since this is a red herring you and other LibSnots can agree with Jorge Arbusto). Johnny Sutton is the one that should be in the klink!

It's like this and it's real simple:
If you make a phone call to a known terrorist in Syria, you maybe in cahoots with known terrorist and phone companies hould not be in any legal trouble.

Are we TRUE AMERICANS for that pardon or against it?

If you are one of many Klinton Kronies who have done things like Mark Rich, you should be jailed and not pardoned even if it's Herr Klinton's last day in office.

Are we TRUE DHIMMICRATS for that pardon or against it?

Are we clear?

Now more Sexy Bikini Girls with Guns:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=E9RYBcWljiA

Iraq=52nd State=Future site of Disney Bagdhad

A red ribbon.

How fitting.

Mr. Bryherb,

Thank you for suppporting Verizon's policy of disclosing private customer data in support of national security objectives.

Although we could adhere to the law and wait for a court order, the courts are notorious in refusing security agency requests in nearly 2 percent of requests. Who's to say that that 2 percent aren't direct lines to Osama bin Laden? The courts?

Would you please drop us a line at MyAccountOnline@verizonwireless.com so that we may collect routing information on your internet mail account. Please also post your phone number so we can call to thank you.

Which terrorists do you know in Syria? Just curious. You seem to know a bit about unauthorized YouTube videos, soft core porn, and weapons. Could you also provide any names and contact informaiton you know associated with these? Thanks.

Once again, thank you for your support. We'll keep it on file in case it's needed.

Regards,

Verizon Wireless

Hey, Verizon. I don't think Bryherb is a terrorist just because he talks about Syria, guns, drugs, and border violations.

I think he's kind of cool with his plans for Disney Baghdad. "Indiana Jones and the IED Airport Road" will really get the adrenaline pumping.

I don't think he should be posting soft core porn links on our wingnut website, though. Keep an eye on him.

VOTE QUAYLE '08 -- A TRUE CONSERVATIVE

Verizon Wireless,

Uh, I don't have a Verizon cellphone or even a cell phone for that matter.
Although I do not know any terrorists in Syria or here in the U.S. and if I did I'd probably kidnap them and drape them in Bacon and torture them with music by The Happy Flowers. I know of some terrorist symps who usually post as trolls on this board. I'm sure they may have Bin Laden on speed dial or in their preferred caller plans.
I think you guys should spend your limited resources on those that are Verizon Wireless customers and focus on cellphones and not what's on YouTube or the internet . Besides, you shouldn't even be on this website while at work.

Sincerely, really,

Bryherb

Mr. Bryherb,

Your Happy Flowers connection has us quite concerned. Have they kidnapped you? Are you experiencing Stockholm Syndrome?

If you are, respond with a note containing lots of "i"s and "b"s -- we'll know what that means.

Help is on the way!

We note you are not a current cellphone subscriber. Would you like to start two months for the price of one?

Verizon Wireless

Dear VeryAntiZionist Whitless,

You guys stick to giving less than stellar customer service and work on those dropped calls and I'll be the DJ. The "alternative music" of The Happy Flowers is a proven method and tool for "loosening up" and "encouraging" terrorists to spill their guts to the infidel.

Thanks,

Bryherb

As VH wrote, Patty Hearst was probably a victim of Stockholm Syndrome. Since she hasn't (to my knowledge at least) engaged in any subversive or anarchist activity in the intervening years I'm willing to forgive and I congratulate her and wish her well.

As hot as Jennifer Grey and Lea Thompson were in Red Dawn, I fell in love (well, lust anyway) with Jennifer in "Ferris Bueller" and with Lea in "Dennis the Menace". mmm-mmm Mrs. Mitchell!

DQ,
You should learn a little something about the Constitution. The 4th Amendment is (as is the entire Bill of Rights) a restriction on government action, not the actions of private individuals or companies. They are regulated by statutes passed by Congress or the state legislatures.
Telecom companies turning over information to the government without a court order is not a violation of the 4th Amendment, but may be a violation of privacy statutes. There's a big difference.

Steve,

Even a TRUE CONSERVATIVE like me learns something new from reading these blogs.

My copy of the U.S. Constituion quotes the Fourth Amendment in it's totality as:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

So yes, the government CAN order searches, provided it has a warrant supprorted by probable cause, with a true statemeent of what's to be serached.

So in today's post-9/11 world, the court warrant is replaced with "executive branch order". And probable cause is replaced by "send us everything".

See, even a seasoned political candidate, can learn something from the moonbats (is that what we're called? or are we the wingnuts? or the numbnuts? it's so confusing) so thank you.

Iraq = 52nd State = Free Oil

Quayle '08 = Your Only Real Choice

DQ,
What's your point? You're not making any more sense than usual. And you never make sense.

Thank you, Steve.

I *am* trying to fit in.

Quayle '08 = Your Only Logical Choice

No, DQ, you're trying to troll, and you're not very good at it.

I wish they had killed the whore and her commie friends. I doubt that it took much persuasion to get PH to turn on honest people, some of her pre-kidnapping friends have told about her interest in radical polotics. There is a bank video that shows the whore GRINNING as she watches one of her partners murder two men. Then there was the time where the whore fired at a man with an asault rifle durring a robery.

And to anyone who wants to defend the whore, SCREW YOU!

KHarn,
sources?

Steve,

You needn't get so personaly offensive. I am not a troll. Conservative Republican Larry Craig was trolling, no doubt. But there are a few TRUE CONSERVATIVES left that are not schlongmouthers.

I am one of the not.

Can we keep our moonbat site civil?

Iraq = 52nd State = Free Oil

Dan,
What's the 51st state?

"steve at February 15, 2008 12:34 PM"

I was around durring that time and it was no secret. Look up the trial transcripts, if you want to do some work.

It is really sort of pointless to try reason with KHarn. You know, KHarn would want to blame the conscripted private soldiers for the war cirmes ordered by their leaders since they carried the guns. And lets leave the leaders and planners alone, since they only sat in their offices.

KHarn is unable to assimulate that in most instances kidnap victims have not been held responsible for crimes directed by their kidnappers. The October 1718 Stede Bonnet trial I mentioned earlier is a case in point.

But of course KHarn is his apoid mind can only say "SCREW YOU". And no, KHarn does not know what happened when to Ms. Shaw when she was kidnapped. Nonpharisaical psychiatrists found much evidence of coercion and abuse. Sorry, KHarn, human reason beats the ape dance.

Farmer Ted,

Is this some kind of potatoe "gotcha"?

What's your angle?

QUALYE '08 -- YOUR ONLY REMAINING CHOICE