« Jim DeMint Takes on Marine-Despising Berkeley Moonbats | Main | Shrillary: Suspension Not Good Enough for David Shuster »
February 10, 2008
Gay Massachusetts Official Carl Stanley McGee Assaults Young Boy
The argument that homosexuals would stop spreading AIDS far and wide if only we would allow them to be monogamous by sacrificing the sanctity of marriage has suffered a setback in the cradle of homosexual "marriage," Taxachusetts:
A top official in Gov. Deval Patrick's administration is accused of sexually assaulting a boy in the steam room of a Florida resort and has been placed on unpaid leave.
Carl Stanley McGee, the assistant secretary for policy and planning, was arrested Dec. 28 after the suspected assault at the Gasparilla Inn and Club in Boca Grande, according to the Lee County Sheriff's Office. […]
McGee was freed on $300,000 bond on Dec. 30 and is to be arraigned Monday on a charge of sexual assault on a victim over 12 using physical force, according to authorities.
The kid is between 12 and 16. McGee is "married" to another homosexual named John Finley IV. The ceremony was gushingly celebrated by their fellow degenerates at the New York Times.
McGee is a Democrat, as you could surmise from AP's unwillingness to report his affiliation.

On tips from V the K and Cheetah.
Posted by Van Helsing at February 10, 2008 10:46 AM
Comments
Yeah, and we know the hashfanatic club is just going to whine that heterosexual couples molest underage boys in restrooms and steamrooms all the time.
The difference, this kind of thing is considered morally unforgivable within traditional heterosexual marriage. It is not a big deal for most of the gay community. In fact, Mr McGee will probably find no small amount of support and rationalization within his community.
Posted by: V the K at February 10, 2008 11:21 AM
I looked for a post about this at the DUmp or Kus or even Huff&puff, nothing. Must not be true!
Posted by: beefeater at February 10, 2008 11:25 AM
UM,
This might be justification for divorce?
And homosexuals are such good folks!
I think John Wayne Gasey was just misunderstood.
Posted by: UCA at February 10, 2008 1:08 PM
Carlos...oh ...C-A-R-L-O-S? Care to field this one?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at February 10, 2008 1:08 PM
I believe Juan Carlos would say, "L'homophobie rend folle.
Posted by: V the K at February 10, 2008 1:55 PM
Just molesting boys, not that there's anything wrong with that, or, indeed, with anything. /sarc
Posted by: Jay Guevara at February 10, 2008 2:05 PM
This pervert raped this boy on December 28 - and a search of Google News indicates not a peep in the Media until February 7.
Obviously - it must not be newsworthy. I guess that means it is expected/accepted/"normal" homosexual behaviour that is best ignored. Can't smear homos - they're normally tho thweet - this wath jutht an abnormal thituation. What wath a boy doing in the man'th area anyway. He wath athking for it.
Posted by: Jimbo at February 10, 2008 3:04 PM
More moonbat family values: Knock-up your teenaged son's girlfriend and live on welfare.
Posted by: V the K at February 10, 2008 3:24 PM
Aw, c'mon folks...it's only bad if a Republican does this stuff...don't you know that?????
Posted by: Toa at February 10, 2008 7:29 PM
While this won't make me popular, I could give a rat's ass about whether two gay men or two gay women wanna get married. Just like I could care less if 2 women and 1 man get married (as long as they are all consenting adults its none of anyone else's business, let alone the government). Consenting adults can do as they please as long as its not breaking a law (and I mean an actual law and not some leftover Victorian morality code).
The thing I find truly ironic is that the homosexual community doesn't understand the danger they face is not from the Right, but from the Left. Just as Hitler knew about Ernst Röhm and the SA being gay, they used them to catapult to power and then turned on them.
Having said all that, this guy should get the maximum penalty if he is found guilty.
Posted by: Brooklyn Red Leg at February 10, 2008 8:38 PM
Um, V (And you know I'm down with you on just about everything bro) I think this is a pedophilia as opposed to homosexual issue. Also a political issue to the press' refusal to identify his label. And let's face it, can't we all agree (My favorite democrat line), that pedophiles need to be executed. Homo's...eh not so much.
Posted by: Donald at February 11, 2008 3:06 AM
I think this is a pedophilia as opposed to homosexual issue
It's an instance of pederasty, not pedophilia, but if one chooses to lump in a teenager with pre-pubescent children, then it's an instance of homosexual pedophilia.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at February 11, 2008 11:21 AM
When I was in college, the issue of older men hooking up with underage boys came up on a gay-oriented student message board. About one-third agreed with most of us here that it was wrong, and about one-third didn't see anything wrong with it, and another third said they didn't want to judge because "the same people who think (pederasty) is wrong are the same people who think homosexuality is wrong." So, when I say there is more tolerance for this kind of behavior in the gay community than in the straight mainstream, I am basing it most on that. Also, during the Mark Foley controversy a couple of years ago, when people brought up Gerry Studds as an example of a Democrat who got away with far worse than what Foley was accused of, a number of liberal gays on the blog I was participating on defended Studds.
Posted by: V the K at February 11, 2008 12:03 PM
Thanks Jay. I never even heard of Pederasty. I still want them executed. V, there's a whole lot of dudes that want to bang young girls. I'd like them executed whether homo or not. Cheers!
Posted by: Donald at February 12, 2008 6:04 AM
No problem, Donald. You probably hadn't heard of pederasty because it's a concept that lefties want buried lower than whale crap. Its definition alone makes it awfully tough to spin or to weasel around, making it anathema to the left.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at February 12, 2008 12:49 PM
McGee was freed on $300,000 bond on Dec. 30 and is to be arraigned Monday on a charge of sexual assault on a victim over 12 using physical force, according to authorities.
"using physical force" implies "rape"...and I believe it is also called "ephophilia" or homosexual "affection" for a pubescent young man.
Posted by: denise martin at February 19, 2008 11:06 PM
Sorry...it's called "ephebophilia" not ephophilia, to separate it from homosexual rape of prepubescent-aged children.
Posted by: denise martin at February 19, 2008 11:09 PM
Answering Machine in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Planning and Development of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: "Can't come to the phone right now. I'm sucking a kid's dick in Florida!" Arrrrrrgh!
Posted by: Nathan at February 20, 2008 11:04 AM
As if heterosexuals didn't do the same thing all the time. Be real people.
Posted by: eric at February 21, 2008 10:34 PM
Lisa Lynette Clark, a Georgia woman who married a 15-year-old boy and later had his child, was released from prison Friday.
Posted by: andrew at February 23, 2008 3:58 AM
"As if heterosexuals didn't do the same thing all the time. Be real people."
Actually, they don't. Prison statistics can back up the numbers. Homosexual pederasts/molesters are FAR more active than their heterosexual counterparts. This could be for several reasons, not the least of which is that afterwards it's even more embarrassing for the boy to admit what happened to him, RE: the Catholic church scandal. Once the dam broke we started hearing all sorts of stories about the homosexual priests doing this kind of thing well back into the 1960's.
To suggest heterosexuals of any stripe do this "all the time" is intellectually dishonest.
Posted by: herb at February 24, 2008 11:04 AM

