« Bureauweenies Take Command of NYC Menu Boards | Main | More Abortion Celebrants »

Slavery advocates before the Civil War used to refer to the practice of slavery as "that peculiar institution." There is a long tradition in American political discourse of hiding horrific things behind bland euphemisms, e.g. "Choice."

a performance by the all-female comedy group the Sphincter Troupe.

That phrase reminds me of this: "This our comedy club. Humour here funny in different way. It not reinforce stereotypes. Comedy come from character, real situations. Not abstract craziness."

Meanwhile, while Yalie feminists are cheering on child-butchering, other "intellectuals" lament that Islam failed to conquer Europe the first time around.

Interesting, the article is now gone. It is not available on their YDN front page either any more.

Maybe it was a satire? Otherwise it was inadvertently among the best pro-life arguments I've read, actually. The commenters were universally appalled. Still doesn't excuse it being removed.

the lies of the left will be their demise.

eternally.

Conservatives are the enemy within and the greatest threat to this nation.

I guess they went back to hiding under their rocks, I guess. Later, they will whine that the publicity and reaction to the article made them "feel unsafe." Typical left-wing bullies. When the object is smaller and weaker than they are... like a pre-born infants ... they're all power and bravado. Expose them to criticism and they cry like Nancy Kerrigan.

ummm excuse me, V the K,

There is a little syntax problem here:

"like a pre-born infants"

check your grammar book for use of the article "a".

Just a tip.

I guess due to my typographical error, baby-killing is okay after all, and leftists are not bullying cowards.

Or, more likely, hashy just enjoyed a bowl of stems, seeds and oregano some goth kid convinced him was "really good sh-t" and is back to entertain me with his amusing rants from the Twilight Zone (of consciousness) again.

The entire article can now be found here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1958216/posts

I don't obsess much ;)

What hash is trying to say is that he can't make an opposing argument to the artical, so he tries to attack our grammer.
Typical tactic of Liberals and fools.

KHarn. that is exactly why they do not want to allow an open debate to take place.

KHarn,
"Liberals and fools" is redundant, as hash and its butt buddy so amply demonstrate.

What hash is trying to say is that he can't make an opposing argument to the article, so he tries to attack our grammer.

Fortunately, I'm clever enough to do both.

"Fortunately, I'm clever enough to do both."

Oddly, though, you don't seem to be able to differentiate between me and my "fan", and neither do many of your readers...

Abortion is not an issue both sides will ever agree upon, so, orvict, having such dialogue is fine and good, as long as both sides understand nothing productive will ever be gained from it...

You think that because you always drag conversation into the ground with your hateful and cynical nihilism.

Many people enjoy the benefits of healthy communication. You should try it sometime.

V the K,

I asked you THREE times to answer a simple question which could potentially cause you to reflect momentarily on the source of your irrational beliefs.

You were incapable of doing this. You have proven yourself to be a self righteous, arrogant, empty headed weasel, who can offer nothing to a discussion other than flip, trite, and meaningless off the cuff attempts at humor.

Due to the fact that your views have no grounding in reason, fact or logic, but are clearly based purely on emotion and your own political, religious and nationalistic indoctrination, your comments should, and will, be ignored by free thinking individuals.

You attack MY spelling, as you continue to make spelling and grammar mistakes yourself. You accuse me of name calling, when you name call. You claim to be capable of making opposing arguments, when time and time again, when called on to do, you prove yourself to be completely unable to do so. Just who do you think you are?

You can't even address the correct person in your posts.

Shame on you V.

HF and HFF, you are silly individuals. You do not argue so much as spout long-discredited urban legends from the fever-swamps of the community-based reality, name-call and hurl insults at those who see the world differently than you do. Then, you throw childish tantrums because I ignore your silly questions the way an adult ignores a whining, petulant child. Your poorly-spelled, barely coherent rants are entertaining, but serious debate with you would be a waste of time. If you can't read the posts on this website and see for yourselves how out-of-touch with reality you and your left-wing comrades are, then the point of argument is what, exactly? You simply can't debate at an adult level with little children or crackheads.

Go back to the kids' table. When you demonstrate enough maturity and intellectual gravitas to show you are capable of arguing like adults, then I'll consider engaging you. Until then, your contributions here are but a source of amusement to me.

(It's also a source of profound amusement that hash and hash jr. constantly beg for my attention.)

VK, the trolls feel that negative attention is better than no attention.

I used to have a neighbor with a chihuahua that felt the same way, as the dog was always coming over in my yard yapping at me and nipping at my heels. I ignored it, until finally, I ignored it no longer and gave it a swift kick in the chops. It wanted my attention, and it got it. From that point forward, the little sh#t wasn't so eager for my attention.

It appears that Stoner and his b#tch here need a similar kick to the mush.

Back to your watchtowers, little stormoppets!