« Hospital Sued for Giving Rectal Exam | Main | Al Jazz, Moonbats Claim Hollywood Maligns Arabs »

OK here you go again.....The headline of the article is "Outcry as M and S worker refuses to sell "unclean" book." OUTCRY. No one, and I mean NO ONE qupted in the article defends the worker in question. Even the Muslim Council rep. calls the worker in the worng and condemns what may or may not have been said.

Only a friend of the worker claims that perhaps this was a case of misunderstanding, and that maybe the "victim" didn't really hear what she thought she hear.

Now here's what the cictim says: “I am not racist but I have vowed never to let a person wearing a headdress serve me again. It will be a long, long time before I shop again at M&S.”

I don't know, but anyone who begins a sentence with "I'm not a rascist but..." is in most cases a rascist.

I ask you is it even remotely possible that the "victim" is just a angry, bitter, wing nut, similar to many of you, who, sick of seeing Muslims in her town, decided to play her little part in demonstrating how Muslims are not welcome in reading? Just remotely possible? Could she have mis-heard? could she have made the whole story up?

Why dont you try bringing a bible to Saudi Arabia and then tell me how it goes.

There is a deep prejudice against other religions by militant Muslims that is mainstream enough for whole countries to adopt.

Oh by the way those Islamic Supremacists may or may not be racists, but they are definitely religious bigots.

first of all Freedom, changing the subject to what happens in saudi Arabia has nothing to do with the story at hand. saudi Arabia dosen't go around pounding it's chest and bragging about being a modern, tolerant, multi-ethnic society. We all know what they are about.

Secondly, the saudi's are our friends. We love the saudi's. No one cares about bringing a bible to Saudi Arabia. No one has a problem with the Saudis. Your prez wwas recently there beggin for a discount on the oil that feeds the country..."oh please mr islamofascist,religious bigot, sharia law enforcing warlord....Please just ten dollars more off a barrel? After all we've been shipping our state of art weapons over to you and we gave YOU a good deal...Pretty please?" war on islamofacism? what a joke!

Hashboyfan,
Those weapons aren't that state of the art. We leave the fun bells and whistles off of them so in case we need to blast them out of the sky we can. Why are you baggin W? It's you libterds that don't want America to become energy independent because some caribou,owl,etc might have to walk or fly a little farther. Boo F-ing hoo on the animals. In case you don't realize human needs come before animals.

You’re the one changing the point. This article is about the treatment of the bible by Militant Muslims.

Then you spout off about how its OK for Saudi Arabia to be intolerant because they dont deny that they are intolerant and that Saudi Arabia is our ally. Consider this. While England and France raped the Middle East to get oil, the U.S. treated Saudi Arabia fairly and partnered with them to help them get their oil industry together instead of taking it over. They needed our expertise and we supplied it without exploitation, but somehow that is evil to people like you.

Anyways, this brand of militant Muslim intolerance truly exists as even you admit. In England there is a huge problem with radical Islamists who are very intolerant of their host country.

At a recent debate over the battle for Islamic ideals in England, a British-born Muslim stood before the crowd and said Prophet Mohammed’s message to nonbelievers is: “I come to slaughter all of you”.

“We are the Muslims”, said Omar Brooks, an extremist also known as Abu Izzadeen. “We drink the blood of the enemy, and we can face them anywhere. That is Islam and that is jihad”.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/01/17/warwithin.overview/index.html

“All of the world belongs to Allah, and we will live according to the Sharia wherever we are,” said Choudary, a lawyer. “This is a fundamental belief of the Muslims.”

Asked if he believes in democracy, he said, “No, I don’t at all.”

“One day, the Sharia will be implemented in Britain. It’s a matter of time.”

There is a problem. Europe has suffered from terrorist attacks, wide scale rioting and political murders like Theo van Gogh’s. A militant ideology has taken root in Europe and it’s ignorant to deny it.

Since you are calling people racist, I am curious about one thing HashfanaticFAN. Are you on board with your idol’s advocacy of the preservation of the white race?

In response to this comment from a troll named Chris…

“It wasn’t MEANT to be “everybody’s country”. The Founding Fathers and Americans used to share the belief that America was the product of European civilization-which IT IS. Diversity IS NOT STRENGTH. I know that according to modern PC standards, white people are not allowed to have countries or places to call their own, but that’s because cowardly white people won’t stand up for their own civilization. America is not and never will be a universal nation for everybody because that isn’t possible. Whites are fleeing the immigrant dominated sections of the country for the interior and major sociologists like Putnam now admit that racial diversity essentially destroys the sense of community that freedom needs to flourish. White’s are under assault and they need to wise up.”

HashFanatic said;

“Chris is correct. It may not be a pleasant reality to accept, but it is a reality nonetheless.”

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/01/150_fine_for_sa.html#comments

Are you a fan of such racist ideology too? If you are then I don’t see how you can be such a hypocrite. If you were unaware of how your idol is such a bigot then I could see how that could happen. Next time be more careful of who you idolize.

You’re the one changing the point. This article is about the treatment of the bible by Militant Muslims.

Then you spout off about how its OK for Saudi Arabia to be intolerant because they dont deny that they are intolerant and that Saudi Arabia is our ally. Consider this. While England and France raped the Middle East to get oil, the U.S. treated Saudi Arabia fairly and partnered with them to help them get their oil industry together instead of taking it over. They needed our expertise and we supplied it without exploitation, but somehow that is evil to people like you.

Anyways, this brand of militant Muslim intolerance truly exists as even you admit. In England there is a huge problem with radical Islamists who are very intolerant of their host country.

At a recent debate over the battle for Islamic ideals in England, a British-born Muslim stood before the crowd and said Prophet Mohammed’s message to nonbelievers is: “I come to slaughter all of you”.

“We are the Muslims”, said Omar Brooks, an extremist also known as Abu Izzadeen. “We drink the blood of the enemy, and we can face them anywhere. That is Islam and that is jihad”.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/01/17/warwithin.overview/index.html

“All of the world belongs to Allah, and we will live according to the Sharia wherever we are,” said Choudary, a lawyer. “This is a fundamental belief of the Muslims.”

Asked if he believes in democracy, he said, “No, I don’t at all.”

“One day, the Sharia will be implemented in Britain. It’s a matter of time.”

There is a problem. Europe has suffered from terrorist attacks, wide scale rioting and political murders like Theo van Gogh’s. A militant ideology has taken root in Europe and it’s ignorant to deny it.

Since you are calling people racist, I am curious about one thing HashfanaticFAN. Are you on board with your idol’s advocacy of the preservation of the white race?

In response to this comment from a troll named Chris…

“It wasn’t MEANT to be “everybody’s country”. The Founding Fathers and Americans used to share the belief that America was the product of European civilization-which IT IS. Diversity IS NOT STRENGTH. I know that according to modern PC standards, white people are not allowed to have countries or places to call their own, but that’s because cowardly white people won’t stand up for their own civilization. America is not and never will be a universal nation for everybody because that isn’t possible. Whites are fleeing the immigrant dominated sections of the country for the interior and major sociologists like Putnam now admit that racial diversity essentially destroys the sense of community that freedom needs to flourish. White’s are under assault and they need to wise up.”

HashFanatic said;

“Chris is correct. It may not be a pleasant reality to accept, but it is a reality nonetheless.”

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/01/150_fine_for_sa.html#comments

Are you a fan of such racist ideology too? If you are then I don’t see how you can be such a hypocrite. If you were unaware of how your idol is such a bigot then I could see how that could happen. Next time be more careful of who you idolize.

I ask you is it even remotely possible that the "victim" is just a angry, bitter, wing nut, similar to many of you, who, sick of seeing Muslims in her town, decided to play her little part in demonstrating how Muslims are not welcome in reading?

Hashishfanatic, the vast majority of right-wing nuts wouldn't have any problem with immigrants of any race, religion or culture, so long they come legally, adapt to the established local norms (not try to change it to be like the culture they emigrated from), and don't act like intolerant bigots.

To wit: People in town don't get sick unless malignant, pathogenic germs are involved.

"Hashishfanatic, the vast majority of right-wing nuts..."

BURNING?

I didn't write the above. The poster "hashfanaticfan" did....

I do not agree with "hashfanaticfan" on everything, yet you are misrepresenting his opinions as mine.

It just so happens that I would have concurred with your last response, as I am anti-illegal.

How am I supposed to AGREE WITH YOU if you set yourself in opposition to me before I even get out of the starting gate?

Please be more careful.

Hash,

You are not just anti-illegal, but anti-race mixing. That is sad.

Freedom, I never said that it was OK for Saudi Arabia to be intolerant. The fact is the Saudi Arabia is not founded on principles of tolerance and democracy, so for you to EXPECT that of them is wrong. The fact is we don't expect that from them. We know exactly what they stand for, yet continue to suck up to them. Thus proving that we are not committed in any way to fighting "islamofascism" because money and resources trump morality in the US.

I have never denied that there are muslim extremists determined to influence western politics, and the countries they live in.

I was commenting on the story presented in the post, which was misrepresented by the poster, and frankly, sounds very fishy to me. The assertion that the clerk in question is a militant Muslim who somehow abused a Bible, is an dubious and unwarrented claim, based on fact as presented in the article in question.

I, by the way, am also anti-illegal, and no, I do not agree with everything hashfanatic says. But I still am his or her biggest fan.

Farmer Ted,

so what you appear to be saying is that it's the lefts fault that we sell weapons to our "enemies". It's the left's fault that we have become desperately dependent on Suadi oil.

OK...it has nothing to do with the fact that every single significant member of the Bush is an oil exec? Nothing to do with the Bush family's long standing personal and professional realtionship with Saudi warlords? Nothing to do with the fact that American foreign policy is dictated by purely economic and militarily strategic concerns?

I find the suggestion that the US is morally opposed to fundamental Islam, dictatorship, and opression around the world, frankly, laughable. We oppose those things only when economically convienient. Whcih is exactly what Farmer Ted is saying.

FAN,

I hope you are not as into segregation as much as Chris and HashGOD are.

Anyways, you have the luxury of saying contradictory statements about Saudi Arabia, but it would be nice if you kept your rhetoric consistent. When you stated, "Saudi Arabia doesn’t go around pounding it's chest and bragging about being a modern, tolerant, multi-ethnic society. We all know what they are about."…

You used this line of thinking to undermine my and VH’s attacks on Saudi Arabia but then proceeded to attack Saudi Arabia yourself. That’s not fair (not that I fully expect a stranger on the Internet to be fair, I’m just pointing that out).

The truth is that Saudi Arabia sucks and I always point out the fact that other religions are oppressed in the country and that they have legal Apartheid in Mecca and Medina, but it is strange that Leftists are so quick to use the same tactics that they accuse NeoCons of advocating. When the 9/11 attacks happened Michael Moore went loopy over Bush/Bin Laden family connections. It was blatant guilt by association hysteria driven by political purposes. Many members of the Bin Laden are westernized Saudis, especially those who were visiting the U.S. at the time of the attacks. People who are so quick to establish guilt by association have lost all authority to speak about profiling.

It is true that most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, but they were members of a terrorist group that is also at war with Saudi Arabia. The situation is more complicated than you will admit.

Real politics has made strange bedfellows out of countries like the Soviet Union and even China. That’s because it’s a real world out there, not a fantasyland. With over 190 sovereign countries in the world it gets a bit complicated. In any case, the U.S. is allied with every liberal democratic country on this planet and many of them are deeply indebted to us although they don’t have many resources for us to exploit. Now list all of America’s enemies. Each one of them is fascist, totalitarian or pretty damn close to it.

hashfanatic, on the subject of name accuracy, note that I addressed my comment to 'hashishfanatic'. As everyone knows, hashish is a recreational drug while hash is a breakfast potato.

"possible that the "victim" is just a angry, bitter, wing nut, similar to many of you"

It's far more likely it was just as the article stated. And thanks for including all of us in your fantasy of what conservatives are like. You know everything, I guess.

"anyone who begins a sentence with "I'm not a rascist but..." is in most cases a rascist"

I think just the opposite. In our society we are so conditioned that everything we say or think is likely to be misconscrued by leftist wingnuts such as yourself as something we didn't mean, we have to preface our statements. I think someone who really IS a racist won't bother with that preface.