« Dems on Iraq: Where They Stood Yesterday | Main | The Search for Someone Who Doesn't Hate Keith Olbermann »
January 15, 2008
Jane Smiley Reveals: Moonbat Lawrence O'Donnell Is an Agent of Karl Rove!
Establishment liberals really let their hair down at the Huffington Post, where they think only their fellow moonbats are watching. When journalist Lawrence O'Donnell of the McLaughlin Group posted "John Edwards Is a Loser," Pulitzer-prize–winning author and Breck Girl fan Jane Smiley threw such a tantrum, she nearly lost her tinfoil hat.
O'Donnell's main objection to Silky Pony is what you would expect from a liberal. By taking ultra-left votes from Osama bin Obama-Winfrey, he could tip the primaries to Shrillary and go down as "the Southern white man who stood in the way of the black man."
From Smiley's response, thoughtfully entitled "Shut Up, Larry":
When I read Lawrence O'Donnell's post calling John Edwards a "loser" and threatening a lifetime of infamy if he doesn't get out of the race, I immediately went to O'Donnell's bio to see his party affiliation. I was sure it would say "R" — but it didn't. It didn't say anything.
However, I am fairly sure in my own mind that Karl Rove paid him to write that post.
Jane is anything but smiley as she goes on to shriek that Edwards is "the only candidate in the race who understands how corporations are poisoning American politics and American life with their unrestrained power and influence," that Americans are too racist to vote for blacks, that the sinister Diebold manipulated the New Hampshire primaries, that Rudy Giuliani is "psychopathic," that Karl Rove is "finagling the Democratic primary race," et cetera, et cetera, until the nurse came and made her take her medication.
Did I mention that both of these kooks are members of our intellectual establishment?
It's a good thing for them they aren't in control. They'd be sending each other off to gulags instead of throwing clumps of poop at each other in that cesspool HuffPo.
Hat tip: NewsBusters, on a tip from Cheetah.
Posted by Van Helsing at January 15, 2008 9:40 AM
Comments
Lawrence O'Donnell was last seen here admitting that he bashed Mormons because Mormons were too nice to respond in kind, but he would never criticize Islam because he feared retribution.
Typical left-wing bully-coward.
Posted by: V the K at January 15, 2008 9:57 AM
Smiley is such a tool. She is probably sitting there dreaming about Osama Obama jamming his steeple into her pulpit.
Posted by: Anonymous at January 15, 2008 10:10 AM
Typical left wing idiocy spewing from within a bubble of ignorance. She reads something that upsets her as being heretical and assumes it to be the work of the boogyman. Lawrence O'Donnell is a certified moonbat thug of the first rank.
Posted by: Beef at January 15, 2008 12:51 PM
I'm always disappointed that those who claim that conservatives are "anti-intelectual" can NEVER give an intelligent argument. It's always "you are hatefull, racist, conspiators, corrupt, greedy, slaves to the rich, too rich, uninformed, isolated from society, ect ect".
Posted by: KHarn at January 15, 2008 5:46 PM
KHarn, I'm actually in essential agreement with the points you've listed above, but I do agree that they are used too frequently by the left as instant, catch-all evasions to effective debate, particularly on foreign affairs and the convergence of religion and culture in society.
Posted by: hashfanatic at January 15, 2008 9:46 PM
Hey Kharn it's not all conservatives who are anti-intellectual, uninformed, and unable to argue intelligently.
But that sums you up pretty well.
Posted by: hashfanaticFAN at January 16, 2008 1:43 AM
Where can I buy one of those mind control machines Karl Rove has? Are they avaible at WAL*MART?
Posted by: Anonymous at January 16, 2008 6:09 AM
Hash, for someone as ignorant about history as you, but so knowledgeble of revisionism you have no credibility when you try to talk about someone you claim to be "anti-intellectual, uninformed, and unable to argue intelligently".
No thanks for dragging the debate into the gutter as you always do.
Posted by: Freedom Now at January 16, 2008 7:22 AM
hashfanatic,
Thanks for the post, I like it when you answer directly and with honesty.
hashfanaticFAN.
Coming right after Hash's polite post, yours comes off as snotty and petty, not to mention reflecting BADLY on someone you SAY that you admire!
Posted by: KHarn at January 16, 2008 4:03 PM
