« The Art of Masturbation | Main | Seattle Moonbats Prove Waterboarding Isn't Torture »
January 13, 2008
If You're a Moonbat and You Know It, Dress in Orange
The ACLU encouraged its legions of fifth-column moonbats to express their solidarity with the al Qaeda operatives confined at Guantanamo Bay by dressing in orange last Friday. Some went further, by reciting poetry written by their "brothers," the Gitmo terrorists, in front of the Supreme Court. Others were content to chant demands that our President be arrested, presumably on the terrorists' behalf.
Sometimes I can't help but wish that Club Gitmo lived up to the liberal propaganda, and that these treasonous jackasses were on their way there for interrogation. That's not nice, is it? But at least I haven't wished they would fall into the hands of al Qaeda.
Hat tips: Pencil Nub, Michelle Malkin, This Ain't Hell. On a tip from Scott.
Posted by Van Helsing at January 13, 2008 5:56 PM
Comments
So their stance is to free the terrorists and arrest American politicians.
Sounds like Moonbattery...
Posted by: Freedom Now at January 13, 2008 6:14 PM
And John McCain would rather see thousands of Americans die than pour water up a terrorist's nose for thirty seconds.
Posted by: V the K at January 13, 2008 7:04 PM
If you're Moonbat and you know it, dress in orange (crap crap)
If you're Moonbat and must show it, dress in drag (crap crap)
If you're Moonbat and you blow it, and you just refuse to stow it
If you're Moonbat and won't grow up, crap your pants (crap crap)
Posted by: BUUUUURRRRNING HOT at January 13, 2008 7:17 PM
What these morons will never understand is that the jihadis down in Gitmo would have the whole lot of them beheaded in a proverbial New York Minute if given the chance.
Posted by: Targetpractice at January 14, 2008 3:22 AM
How do you know that there is even one "jihad" in Gitmo?
Posted by: Anonymous at January 14, 2008 4:42 AM
Perhaps its profiling to capture illegal combatants on the battlefield just because they are armed and fighting in Al Qaeda units.
Why dont you commit suicide first Anon? I promise to follow after you.
Posted by: Freedom Now at January 14, 2008 5:54 AM
Hey "freedom", how do you know anything about where these people come from or who they are, or what they did to get there? I'd really like to know what your source is for all the info you have on these prisoners because I haven't seen anything specific about any of them. If you could provide me with a link that gives me the names and some specifics about the charges and circumstances of these prisoners arrest, I'd appreciate it. All I know is what the admin tells me. And, you see, i don't trust the government.
Posted by: Anonymous at January 14, 2008 6:13 AM
Several things. "Anon"- its obvious that you have never put you life on the line for your country at any time in your exsistance. Have been to Afghanistan, Iraq or the Middle East at all.
Second, do you actually believe that the fine men and women of the US Military would just capture any body off the street and throw them in "Gitmo"; if you do your a bigger fool than you even know and thank god you've stayed anonymous.
Posted by: Richard Daugherty at January 14, 2008 10:06 AM
the biggest fool is one who believes anything one is told without the slightest shred of evidence to substantiate those beliefs simply because one WANTS to believe in the source.
sad
Posted by: Anonymous at January 14, 2008 1:35 PM
Your right Anon. I am a fool for believing the government. I should listen to Al Zarqawi who was the first to start this Orange Jumpsuit activism.
Thank you for being a moonbat.
Posted by: Freedom Now at January 14, 2008 4:02 PM
"How do you know that there is even one "jihad" in Gitmo?"
The word is "jihadIST". A "jihad" is an ACT.
These bastards were caught on the BATTLEFIELD UNDER ARMS. According to international treatys and the rules of war, our solders didn't have to TAKE THEM ALIVE, but could have shot them as spys and terrorists even AFTER they had surrendered. This has been the way of the world for CENTURYS.
I wish that we were half as brutal as you traitors seem to think we are, the Muslims would have turned against their imams years ago!
Posted by: KHarn at January 14, 2008 5:23 PM
"The word is "jihadIST"..."
But how can you correct someone's usage of a word for something that does not exist?
There are no jihadists here.
Why would any be in our torture domes to begin with?
Posted by: hashfanatic at January 14, 2008 5:42 PM
hey dipshit KHrn, you really are an idiot.
I used quotation marks around "Jihad" because I was quoting your brother in arms so to speak, maned Targetpractice. Go ahead and read his post in this thread. He's the one who wrote "jihad" Why dont' you give him some shit.
I swear, talking to people who refuse to read, or simply can't is a lot harder than it looks. You've proven in previous posts that you can't write. no you've proven that you can't read. And I'm supposed to take your political views seriously? Please stay home on election day, you're not qualified to read the ballot. Maybe you can bring one of your buddies along to point to the candidate you like for you. Actually, you should proably go....when you see these letters "Obama" that means "Giuliani" ok, got it?
Posted by: hashfanaticFAN at January 15, 2008 5:56 AM
here's a tip Kharn: Read slowly. When a noun ends in a "y", it generally becomes "ies" when making it plural. For example "treatIES and centurIES". If you don't understand this, how can you understand complex political and social issues?
You are disqualified.
Posted by: hashfanaticFAN at January 15, 2008 5:59 AM
spIES, another example.
Seriously, where do you, of all people, get off having the nerve to even begin to criticize others grammar or word choice? Oh, the nerve of some people. Ignorance is such sweet bliss, isn't it?
Posted by: Anonymous at January 15, 2008 6:01 AM
For all your doublespeak KHarn is right. "Jihad" is a noun.
Posted by: Freedom Now at January 15, 2008 12:23 PM

