« Light Up for SCHIP | Main | WWII Hero Cremated to Avoid Grave Desecration by Moonbats »

Why stop at just OJ?

The Jena 6 thugs: http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/media-myths-about-the-jena-6/

Duke Lacrosse non-existent rape case:
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=190
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=165
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=166
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1208088/

Christian-Newsom gang rape, torture and murder case that was ignored by the MSM in favour of the Duke case - because it was a blacks attacking whites case:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom

WHITE IS THE NEW BLACK!!!

When is Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin going to come up with a book titled as above, detailing the modern-day phenomenon of whites being the predominant group that is racially discriminated against - even by other (liberal media) whites?

(Me Asian, btw. But me no steleotype. No build Gleat Wall.)

Nice list Scott. Also, caucasians only constitute about 10-13% of the world's population (we're semi-powerful but not terribly prolific); therefore white guys/gals are a minority among the 6.6 billion folks now breathing.

When you consider that a racist is someone that believes that the fundamentals of a person's character are determined by race the only conclusion you can come to is that these moonbats are racists.

The term racism is definitely overused, but to say that using it is racist in itself is simply absurd: racism does exist, no question about it.

Would you also say that users of the (also overused) term anti-Semitism are racists too? I thought not...

Gert,
What do you have to say about the SUBJECT of the artical? Didn't you read the WHOLE artical, or did you just jump on Van's conclusions as Linerals are prone to do?

Gert; I think the point here is two different definitions of "racist". The commonplace one, which people understand to mean "somebody who discriminates against people on the basis of their race"; and virtually everybody agrees that that is a Bad Thing.

But the definition used in the article linked to is different; it defines "racist" as literally meaning "a white person". All white persons are racist, without exception; no people of other races are racist, without exception.

As such, by that definition the word racist is, itself, racist.

As an aside; like most of Moonbattery we see a strange reconfiguring of judaeo-christian beliefs with the God taken out and attacking only western people. As in this example; "everybody is born in sin" (christian) becomes "everybody white is born in sin" with a crucial difference. Christianity offers redemption, whereas there's no such luck with Moonbattery. Your white, you're evil, there's no cure, go straight to hell, do not pass Go, do not collect £200.

(Off topic, but other parallels include the apocalypse, which in Christianity is the result of mankind's sin; the Moonbat apocalypse is the result of white/western man's sin (I threw a sandwich away yesterday without eating it, O woe, evil am I!) Also, the lost paradise (Eden) becomes the mystical pre-industrial, pre-colonial, pre-imperial world where everybody was a noble savage. In christianity, paradise was lost by Eve's sin. In Moonbattery, paradise was lost due to white man's sin. And so on.)

I like reading Ian's comments, he writes what most of us THINK, but don't quite get it down in type.

There is nothing novel about this. When considering the mindset of black people as a whole it doesn't require an excursion from sensibility to realize that the predominant notion is that racism is a unilateral offense. The term has become threadbare. How many of us read or hear the term mentioned and immediately become suspicious? I certainly do. This is precisely why there cannot be any significant progress on the issue under the current atmosphere of political correctness. The national well of white guilt has been drained. White people need to stop apologizing for their culture and start realizing that their values and expectations regarding behavior are just as valid as any other culture's. As it stands now, I, as a white person, am prohibited from being offended lest I be considered intolerant. Why the hell is it incumbent upon white people to make all of the adjustments? I genuinely think that the overwhelming majority of white people have no interest in dominating other races. It should be obvious that it benefits the country as a whole for everyone to have opportunities for success. However, having a resolute set of standards, principles and values is not equivalent to being an oppressor.

The criminals and race-mongers among the Black and Hispanic communities in the U.S., with the eager help of scared-into-submission White "Liberals", have been pushing for this kind of thing to be etched into law for a long time, and it is finally being realized. Their intended reault is a murderous caste system where people of certain races are completely above the law, supposedly to "even the playing field" and "make reparations".

Don't forget the vicious attacks of those three young white women in Long Beach on Halloween of 2006. The media almost completely ignored that hideous hate crime, and most of the convicted assailants got off light with just probation and community service

Thank you, KHarn :)

It's pretty safe to say that several commenters here have racist tendencies. That inevitable, irrepressible urge to try and turn the tables: "There's no racism! It's the ones that call others racists that are racists!" is a clear indicator, whether you like it or not.

You're a pathetic bunch.

Well, Gert, we may be pathetic, but at least we read what we're commenting on before hurling insults, unlike yourself.

I don't think you even understand the issues here. I don't think you have any philosophical point of view on the subject, Gert. You're just another cultist, trained to point at heretics and chant slogans, my friend. You see a trigger, your mouth opens, out comes the pre-programmed denunciation.

Yes, your kind of "liberalism" (an offence to the meaning of the world "liberal" is a cult. Just like scientology, or the moonies, or the various fundamentalisms. You're trained not to think for yourself, to argue always by authority, to cut yourself off from non-believers, only venturing among them to cause dismay or to try to proselytise. And your only weapon, devoid as you are of logical support for your belief system, is to shout the heretic down. Condemn her with a word. "Racist!" you shout, and the heretic is cast out.

And under it all, you're terrified that you may be wrong. You pour over your pamphlets and your websites, bolstering your beliefs like somebody squinting at the quaran before beating his wife. But you don't think about anything. You never question what you beleive (for fear you may come to doubt it). And as we see, you don't even bother to consider the heretics' words before condemning them.

Oooh, we have "racist tendencies". But strangely, ye who would condemn every white person on the planet, even the unborn are completely devoid of racism.

Be daring, Gert. Do something you've never dared to do before. Consider and analyse your own beliefs and dare, just for a second, to consider that you may be wrong.

Gert at November 4, 2007 3:20 PM

OK, if you believe this, then I DARE YOU to announce right here that YOU ARE A LILLY-WHITE RACIST SCUZBAG.