« Global Warming Propaganda Blitz at University of Colorado | Main | San Francisco to Issue ID to Illegal Aliens »
November 14, 2007
Bruxism as Covered by the New York Times
With the New York Times, even an article in the health section about sleep bruxism (grinding your teeth) manages to rub homosexuality in readers' faces.
Author Paul VanDeCarr quotes a doctor who says the pressure is the equivalent of a football player standing on your tooth. VanDeCarr then chirps:
Even if I wanted a football player in my bed, I certainly wouldn't want him standing on my teeth. I became aware of his presence the way that many bruxers do. My then-boyfriend told me I woke him up with a dreadful crunching noise that came from grinding…
Got it, you're stylishly gay — whatever that may have to do with bruxism. Surprisingly, global warming wasn't mentioned.
On a tip from Dave.
Posted by Van Helsing at November 14, 2007 10:13 AM
Comments
>>Even if I wanted a football player in my bed, I certainly wouldn't want him standing on my teeth.>>
To an ordinary writer, that would have been enough, the joke would have been chuckled at by all, including GAYS!
Posted by: KHarn at November 14, 2007 11:09 AM
More news on the Gay Pride front. A high school teacher who photographed boys' nipples, urged his classes to visit his MySpace where he linked to pr0n and described his predilection for young boys, and apparently downloaded pr0n to his school computer. Also, he fantasized about molesting his students.
He's still on the payroll while he appeals his dismissal.
And here's a lesbian school teacher who did... the same thing Democrats say was perfectly okay when Congressman Garry Studds did it.
Just another pair of faces in the great Folsom Street Pride Parade.
{It's not that heterosexuals don't engage in this type of conduct, it's that heterosexuals don't have a "civil rights" machine claiming that it's "discrimination" to expect them to behave to normal standards of conduct.}
Posted by: V the K at November 14, 2007 4:26 PM
I haven't read the original article (I refuse to log onto the NYT), but does it make clear that the "doctor" quoted isn't a woman?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 14, 2007 7:31 PM
Jay,
It sounds like PAUL VanDeCarr is making the quoted observation.
Posted by: KHarn at November 14, 2007 7:52 PM
Another thing,
Even if the doctor was a woman and talking about "her" boyfriend, it suggests that she was having pre-marital sex, which is encouraged by Liberals because gratuitous sex is "a right" threatened by Conservatives.
Posted by: KHarn at November 14, 2007 7:56 PM
KHarn is correct, it's VanDeCarr going on about his boyfriend. I reworded for clarity.
Posted by: Van Helsing at November 14, 2007 8:10 PM
V, Thanks. It was a bit ambiguous before. Now, unfortunately, it's not. The mind boggles at what might have caused the "dreadful crunching noise that came from grinding" with those two.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 14, 2007 9:12 PM
