« Chicago Area Schools Ban Santa, Halloween, and Jell-O for Allah | Main | Barack Obama Promises Nuclear Freeze »
October 2, 2007
Homosexuals Bring Children to Leather Festival
The Golden Gate [X]Press reports on Sunday's Folsom Street Fair leather fetish festival in San Franfreakshow, a predominantly homosexual event sponsored in part by Miller Beer:
Some of the most unlikely attendees of Sunday's kinky leather fetish festival were under four feet tall.
Two-year-olds Zola and Veronica Kruschel waddled through Folsom Street Fair amidst strangers in fishnets and leather crotch pouches, semi and fully nude men.
The twin girls who were also dressed for the event wore identical lace blouses, floral bonnets and black leather collars purchased from a pet store.
Fathers Gary Beuschel and John Kruse watched over them closely. They were proud to show the twins off.
Not everyone taking part of the festivities would agree it was a suitable place for homosexuals to bring their adopted kids:
"Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god's [sic] sake," said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years.
But returning to the proud parents:
Father of two, John Kruse said it is an educational experience for children. He said there were conservative parents against having kids at the event.
"Those are the same close-minded people who think we shouldn't have children to begin with," he said.
No one can say we weren't warned about the kind of sewer progressives are making us to "progress" toward.
On a tip from V the K.
Posted by Van Helsing at October 2, 2007 7:10 AM
Ugh...gross. Some education. When the guy who masturbates in public thinks it's a bad idea, maybe those guys should listen up.
Posted by: Pam at October 2, 2007 7:41 AM
When the guy who masturbates in public thinks it's a bad idea, maybe those guys should listen up.
That should be a t-shirt.
Posted by: Archonix at October 2, 2007 7:49 AM
" said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years."
Maybe he'd feel better if he did it more often, but in private.
Posted by: Ian from the EUSSR at October 2, 2007 7:56 AM
Yeah, it's pretty sad when the guy whacking it in the street seems to be less insane than the rest of them.
As usual with these stories, the kids who are being dragged along are the only ones who make any sense:
"As for Dylan Middlebrooks, it was his sixth year at the leather fair. He is 10 years old.
'It's pretty nasty because a lot of people here are naked,' said Middlebrooks, who was there with his mother."
Posted by: forest at October 2, 2007 8:09 AM
Isn't this child endagerment?
If you sent a nude picture of your self to a kid, you could go to jail, so how is it ok to take them to a place with adults masturbating?
It makes no sense, but then again it is San FranFreako.
Still does not make it OK. This crap has to stop.
Posted by: trace at October 2, 2007 9:16 AM
"Those are the same close-minded people who think we shouldn't have children to begin with," he said."
Uh, since two of like sex CAN'T procreate, I believe NATURE has determined that queers shouldn't "have children to begin with". So, is the homosexual who made this idiotic statement saying that nature is close-minded?? Take it up with her, boy. You won't win that argument.
Posted by: fellowes at October 2, 2007 9:45 AM
Posted by: V the K at October 2, 2007 9:57 AM
LOL, yeah, nature is closed-minded, and stories like this one are making me agree with her. But seriously, children should not be anywhere near that festival.
Posted by: the thinker at October 2, 2007 10:23 AM
"Fathers Gary Beuschel and John Kruse watched over them closely. They were proud to show the twins off."
Anyone still doubting Immaculate Conception?
Posted by: k. smart at October 2, 2007 10:40 AM
"Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god's sake,"
Let's think... For what reason would an adult want to get a child used to sights like watching grown men masturbate? What would be the benefit? I have a idea of a VERY ugly reason.
Posted by: GigisMom at October 2, 2007 10:49 AM
Bug-chasing and gift-giving are very popular among the gay s&m crowd, so most of the fulsom street perverts will die horrible and premature deaths.
Posted by: V the K at October 2, 2007 11:05 AM
Those poor girls... imagine how warped their views on social interaction will be growing up with those sick freaks.
Posted by: Alex at October 2, 2007 11:51 AM
No doubt these same people would be aghast if you took your kids to a gun show. The are currently trying to prevent them from viewing a Blue Angels air show.
Posted by: Gregory at October 2, 2007 12:03 PM
You think that's bad? Here, the Red Arrows have been told they're not doing a display at the Olympics, because theyre "too British".
Posted by: Ian from the EUSSR at October 2, 2007 1:20 PM
Heard about that, Ian...ridiculous! Imagine the host country of the Olympics showing national pride. Why, it's blasphemous!
Posted by: Pam at October 2, 2007 5:47 PM
The Red Arrows, as an aerial display team, are a relic of a bygone era. Not only do they represent the nation (red, white and blue smoke cannisters? Unthinkable!) they also represent a belief in technological progress, the idea that technology can be thrilling. Not something we want the New Model Children to grow up thinking.
They're also masculine. I can just see some professor of Wimmins' Postmodern Studies writing at length about their shiny red shafts, thrusting into the womb of the sky, raping it with their carbon emissions...
Posted by: Ian from the EUSSR at October 3, 2007 5:24 AM