« Preventing Child Sexual Abuse Among Aborigines Called Genocide | Main | Ultimate Global Warming Challenge »

"The couple... has no idea who may have left the burning flag."

Of course they don't. By rule, liberals are sniveling cowards. Face a real live marine? They'd pee their pants. That's why they slink around at night with the other slugs.

Good thing they didn't burn a Koran in front of a mosque, they'd be in prison right now.

Good thing they didn't burn a Koran in front of a mosque, they'd be in prison right now.

If they were lucky...

Thats f'd up. If nothing else, that is grounds for criminal mischief/trespass, harassment and battery. Those morons, if caught, should be forced to do at least 1000 hours of community service tending gravesides.

you cant but help but hate those niggers

Of course they don't. By rule, liberals are sniveling cowards.

Like "Anonymous" here.

van - you have a serious troll problem - the anon has been seen on a couple of posts now and is quite offensive. someone thought it was i who wrote one of his nasty comments.

anyhoo - i'd love for this to happen to me - God help them when i come up their backside with my 12 guage and pepper their arses!

"Of course they don't. By rule, liberals are sniveling cowards. Face a real live marine? They'd pee their pants."
They'd probably also crap their pants at the same time. It's certainly true that, by definition, libs (Especially "Activist" libs like the ones who did this beastly act of vandalism) are total cowards. Even on the few occasions when they actually have enough guts to do their stupid crap while others are watching, they almost always cover their faces with masks or bandanas because they're still too chicken to let anyone learn their identities.

Sounds to me like a couple of stupid teenagers, not the boogeyman that you all are afraid of.

Sorry about the anonymous troll with the "nigger" comments. I haven't had access to a computer since yesterday, but his/her/its IP address has now been banned.

>>Sounds to me like a couple of stupid teenagers, not the boogeyman that you all are afraid of.

>>Posted by: defasdefbe at August 9, 2007 7:37 AM

Care to elaborate on that statement? If somebody were to come in the middle of the night and burned something in YOUR yard, would you just say "Oh, it's JUST a couple of stupid teenagers who cares"? I think not.
Tresspassing, arson, malicious mischief, disturbing the peace, since there are laws against "verbal asault", this should qualify for the same type of charge. The prosecuter should also charge them with a "hate crime" when they are caught, even if it didn't stick, it would set a presidence.

Fat chance of any "hate-crime" charge being applied to stuff like this. Reminds me of the cowards in Oregon a few years ago: a group of Black thug college football players noticed a White active-duty G.I. on the dance floor with his Black wife. They went over, insulted the lady and physically assaulted the soldier as he defended his wife from these scum. Punchline: The powers that be were actually at a loss as to whether or not a "hate crime" had been committed. Like Van said, so-called "hate crime" laws are only meant to grant special protection to groups favored and/or feared by "Liberals.

>Sounds to me like a couple of stupid teenagers, not the boogeyman that you all are afraid of.

1) Proof?

2) Same response if it was a cross in front of a black person's house?

3) Historically are flag burners just stupid teenagers or left-wing activists? If the former, then name the incidents, if the latter then why do you say "sounds to me" in this case?

4) Are teenagers the new privileged group that are allowed to break laws? And would this be any law, or only if the crime leans to the left?

NGWFJ, don't hold your breath waiting for a sensible response from defasdefbe...or ANY response, for that matter...