« Chavez Continues to Tighten His Grip | Main | Flesh-Eating Bacteria Spread by Global Warming and the War in Iraq »
August 16, 2007
Artist Marries Doll
What's next, after homosexual activists get their way with gay "marriage"? Artist Amber Hawk Swanson offers a clue:
Amber Hawk Swanson met Amber Doll on January 25 and the two were married the next day in matching rented gowns at the Aladdin Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. […] Swanson, a video and performance artist, had ordered her bride online: Amber Doll, a lifelike sex doll, was specially made to look just like her.
Swanson combines mocking marriage with mocking art. The final four days of production of the expensive doll, its trip to Vegas with Swanson, and the "marriage" were all filmed as part of the artsy video To Have, To Hold, To Violate: The Making of Amber Doll. It screened at a Chicago showing of movies by local homosexuals.
Now Amber Doll is participating in artistic projects "exploring the interplay between fantasy and reality in sexual relationships." Swanson tattooed the word "Bully" on her own wrist and had "Prey" painted on the doll's. This should give you an idea of the nature of the self-indulgent fantasies Swanson enacts with her inanimate "wife" in front of cameras for the sake of what now passes for art.
On a tip from A.C # 1.
Posted by Van Helsing at August 16, 2007 10:11 AM
Comments
Note that glazed look in her eyes (the woman, not the doll!) - she is clearly on some sort of pharmaceutical. She is clearly in the running for Mayor of Crazy Town!
Posted by: Anonymous at August 16, 2007 10:23 AM
"They searched Michael Jackson's bedroom and found life-size dolls of little boys, one of them dressed in a Cub Scout suit. Innocent enough, but if they searched my room and found a life-size doll of a woman, everyone would assume I was f**kin' it. And they'd be right!" - Ron White
Posted by: V the K at August 16, 2007 10:26 AM
Is she using a strap on to rape a doll based on herself? Hmmmm. Yeah. Ok. --------- WTF???
Posted by: Anonymous at August 16, 2007 10:34 AM
Eh, she's a rich, narcissistic twit. While it could be called art, in some cases, its not edifying in either a positive or negative way in my opinion. So its a 'masturbating myself' image she wants to convey. Big deal. Its called porno last time I checked.
Its also the same tired misandryst message men have been getting for a while now. You think sex between a man and woman is rape, we get it. Men are disgusting pigs because there are some who have to buy these dolls to get off, we get it. Don't care.
Posted by: Brooklyn Red Leg at August 16, 2007 10:36 AM
We-ird!
Posted by: Byron at August 16, 2007 10:41 AM
PLEASE DON'T TELL ME FEDERAL MONEY IS USED TO PAY FOR THIS "ART".
Posted by: heart attack at August 16, 2007 11:06 AM
AMBER alert!
Posted by: Anonymous at August 16, 2007 11:33 AM
Calling this nut an ARTIST is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer a CHEF.
Posted by: Anonymous at August 16, 2007 11:36 AM
it takes all kinds.
nothing surprises me anymore and i'm rapidly losing my G-dgiven ability to blush.
FREAK!
Posted by: nanc at August 16, 2007 12:13 PM
It doesn't "take all kinds" but unfortunately we HAVE all kinds!
Posted by: metalgarth at August 16, 2007 1:10 PM
Stunning, isn't it, that the doll is far better looking than the real woman.
Posted by: jc14 at August 16, 2007 8:06 PM
The doll is considerably better looking than the reputed "artist." That's kind of funny...to me, at least. Art imitates life, I suppose.
Posted by: skh.pcola at August 16, 2007 9:33 PM
If its deviant enough, it gets the liberal stamp of approval. If she needed to see herself gettin it, why didnt she just buy a mirror. Much cheaper and you get to see the lips move.
Posted by: Hemlock at August 17, 2007 4:21 AM
So how is this any different from porn (other than that the women in porn are usually more attractive)?
"As far as I can tell, the only difference between hardcore and softcore is the lighting."
Ron Jeremy
Posted by: phil at August 17, 2007 6:13 AM
