« Westchester's War on Leaf Blowers | Main | G. Is For Gullible »

This is typical fascist, skin head propaganda designed to make it seem as if ALL gay people engage in such behavior. Nothing could be further from the truth.

What about "Lovers Lanes" throughout the world - where heterosexuals have been having sex for generations - including full blown intercourse.

Who rapes women?

Heterosexual men do.

Should we discuss the heterosexual problem???

Maybe we should discuss your feelings of HOSTILITY, G.? Maybe you should tell us why sex in public places is desirable for ANY sexual orientation? Or is it just gays?

Maybe we should discuss your feelings of HOSTILITY, G.? Maybe you should tell us why sex in public places is desirable for ANY sexual orientation? Or is it just gays who NEED to do "the act" where people can walk in on them?

KHarn,

Sex in public places is NOT OK.

I did not say it was.

Maybe we should discuss your feelings of HOSTILITY, G.? Maybe you should tell us why sex in public places is desirable for ANY sexual orientation? Or is it just gays who need to have sex where people can walk in on them?

PS: I'm sorry if this is a multiple post, something seems to be wrong with the commenter. maybe it's G.'s Liberal COOTIES!

Again, I'm sorry for the multiple posts. But not for the "cooties" crack. (Wink!)

Who rapes women?

Heterosexual men do.

Should we discuss the heterosexual problem???

If that's what is happening in public bathrooms, then sure, we can discuss it. But that's not what is happening here, now is it, Madame?

Try to keep up, Sunshine.

Crush Liberalism,

My point is: It is a very small % of gays that would do that - and then only gay men - not gay women.

Why is Van Helsing posting this article? - just a question.

Does he post articles about all the straight guys that spend their paychecks at strip clubs?

Why is Van Helsing posting this article? - just a question.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that because the blog is called "Moonbattery", it is dedicated to showing illustrations of...moonbattery? I know, I know, I'm reachin' here.

Does he post articles about all the straight guys that spend their paychecks at strip clubs?

If they're moonbats, then yeah, he would. See how this whole "topic" thingy works?

Why is Van Helsing posting this article? - just a question.

I suspect that it is because of the laughable idea of spending $250,000 of the public's money on one frackin' toilet so homosexuals won't be able to cornhole each other in public. But, like Crush Liberalism, I'm just guessing.

skh.pcola,

A small % of homosexulas - not me and not the vast majority of gay men - and not gay women.

With all due respect, it may be a small %age, but even here in Pensacola, there are places that are well-known "hook up" locations for gays. The local police try to keep public property in a state where everybody can use it, but that small percentage is insistent on public sex. I cannot think of any other place that is well-known for hetero public sex. That may be attributable to several factors, such as persecution of homosexuals by the police, strong public opinion against gays, &c., but as a heterosexual man, it has never occured to me to go doinking chicks in a public place.

No matter how many gays avail themselves of the apparently irrestible urge to perform sexual acts with total strangers, it is a large enough number that some locales feel compelled to unass (no pun intended) serious cash to combat the problem. It seems like they could staff the facilities in question with a live LEO for $250,000 per toilet.

skh.pcola,

That is b/c chicks would never do that sort of thing.

uh, yes they do and would. *I* never would, regardless of my level of inebriation...or her extensive level of pulchritude.

It is very unfortunately true that some of us DO actually boink in public places. Perhaps even more disturbing is the number of us who actually like Barbra Streisand, fainting at the sound of her voice as she kneels on the neck of a song and strangles it to death, instead of fainting at the utter crap that comes out of her mouth.

If it takes an expensive loo to stop this, then so be it. I'd rather that we clean up our act, but it ain't gonna happen any more than Clarence Thomas is going to be able to clean up the likes of "race hustling poverty pimps" (pace J. C. Watts) of Jesse Jackson.

That said, and I am not engaging in special pleading, one could make a point that in years past, being gay alone was iconoclastic enough. Coming out is truly traumatic, or at least to one of my years. It is utterly deracinating for you have no role models. You have to create yourself and is there a better way to reject conservatism, which conserves past successful behavior? If society did not make gays feel like monsters from the beginning, and things are looking up, then I suspect that many gays would not have to create themselves, a difficult thing to do without a role model, and a very dangerous one. And so many gays would not learn to be transgressive (sorry for that cant leftie word). And wouldn't acquire a taste for this. And that would, I suspect, solve the problem.

Owing to a finger fart, that comment above went cowardly into the night, unsigned by me.