« Muslim Juror in Hijab Listens to Music Instead of Trial | Main | Keith Ellison: The Muslim–Moonbat Alliance Incarnate »

"Bill O'Reilly admitted to Rashad Robinson, GLAAD, that the recent story about lesbian gangs on The Factor, 6/21, was "overstated" and Robinson graciously thanked BOR for his effort to correct the mistake. For a brief moment O'Reilly appeared decent and even dignified but in a flash it was gone as he began explaining why he reported the story in the first place.

O'Reilly started his justification with the first story he noted but did not report initially about four women convicted in New York. Robinson reminded him that they were not considered a gang so O'Reilly rephrased with, " A pack of lesbians jumped this guy and killed him". Then BOR said he got the story about lesbians in Memphis and another from Philadelphia about a gang DTO, Dykes Taking Over. He told Robinson when he had three stories, he decided to do the report.

Robinson reminded O'Reilly that there had been no arrest in Memphis and in Philadelphia it was a one time incident by a group of 8th graders. O'Reilly claimed the 8th graders were a gang because they had a name adding that it was a valid story but admitted that the situation wasn't out of control.

Robinson was getting annoyed and told BOR that he had reported it as a "national epidemic".
O'Reilly made light of his "overstatement" with a wisecrack. "I'm not in fear of the lesbians beating me up." Then O'Reilly smoothed the tension assuring Robinson that in the future they would work together and all the usual blah blah.

It's hard to say if Bill O'Reilly would have apologized on his own if Rod Wheeler, legal analyst, hadn't admitted his facts were wrong.

"Humbly, I submit to you that as a professional, I am not too proud to admit when I've perhaps made a mistake, have misspoken, or have been misinterpreted surrounding a particular issue," he wrote. "I urge all who felt personally offended by the information provided to accept my apology, and let's focus and work together at addressing the gang and other real problems in some communities here in the United States."

http://www.newshounds.us/2007/07/09/bill_oreilly_admits_lesbian_gang_story_overstated_but.php

Van Helsing,

What is a Homosexual activist?

Someone who wants equality under the law?

How active!!!

Change is bad right?? Unless there is something in it for you.

Van Heloising,

Please post some stories about how gay men are being beaten and killed by skinheads and facists for being gay.

Or is this a skin head blog??

"You may remember the horrific gay bashing that occurred following last year's Gay Pride in San Diego in which six people were taunted and attacked by a group of men with a baseball bat and a sharp object near Balboa Park following the festival."

Every time I start getting a little homesick for my hometown of Memphis, I see sh#t like this and remind myself why I'm glad I don't live there anymore.

Why does Van Helsing have to `post some stories about how gay men are being beaten and killed by skinheads and facists for being gay'?

Note also the characteristic knee-jerk, tu quoque response to gay violence.

White Cane,

He does not have to - but the fact that he doesn't means something - yet he posts this story about lesbians [which was admittedly overblown by Bill O'Reilly].

Is this a skinhead blog???

Just wondering.

Do you still beat your brother?

Whenever a story comes out that makes homosexuals look bad, like this one, or some public toilet sex scandal, or "fistgate," groups like GLAAD are always quick to denounce the accusers, but they never condemn the perpetrators.

If a bunch of men get busted for having sex in a public bathroom, the cops are "homophobic." Yeah, right. And the men are just normal guys.

GLAAD's, and other groups like them, refusal to condemn the disgusting behavior exhibited by members of its "community" is the same thing as endorsement. Why should I look at them as a respectable organization when they want to protect some of the slimy elements in their "community."

Steve,

I feel that gay men having sex in a bathroom is disgusting and they should be arrested.

What GLAAD does is watch for any overblowing of such stories that will then encite violence against other gays who have nothign to do with the incident or such behavior.

I agree with you that if gay people want respect we need to start calling out other gays for irresponsible behavior.

I don't know what `overblown' means, G.. Nonetheless, I am interested in why you immediately began pointing out straight violence against gays. Are you suggesting that straight violence against gays justifies gay violence against straights?

Furthermore, I hope you are not suggesting that because Van Helsing does not post anti-gay violence, he somehow supports violence against gays.

White Cane,

I am gay and I post that story so people do not get the impression that gays are evil just b/c they are gay.

Some people don't know any gay person. They read something like Van Helsing's post and they make alot of assumptions.

Well G, Here's your opportunity to show us all on this board and the rest of the world what a reasonable centrist kind of gay person you are. Please do contact GLAAD and any other gay organizations and tell them not to condone or dismiss(in your name)any and all violent acts by individuals in the gay community. And please CC us via email or web link. We'll hold our breath just like we've been holding our breath for the moderate muslims to to the same with radical muslims.

Steve, you are 100% correct. In my alma mater's town of Tallahassee, FL, there was a story where the local police were launching a sting to crack down on sex in the public restrooms at Tom Brown Park. This park is used extensively by families with small children.

Did the local gay rights organization appreciate law enforcement's efforts to nab these cretins using public facilities to indulge their sexual appetites? Did the local gay rights organization say anything like "What two consenting adults do IN THE PRIVACY OF THEIR OWN HOMES OR HOTEL ROOMS is no one's business"? Did they say "We thank the cops for busting some guys that give us law-abiding gays a bad name"? Not quite.

Their reaction was something along the lines of "The 'tea room' is an integral part of the growth of gay men, and we're concerned that the police are trying to intimidate people based on their sexual orientation."

Yep, you heard right. Apparently, enforcing the laws that prohibit sexual exhibitionism is considered "intimidating" to people. Also (and this is something that as a straight guy, I was completely unaware of), apparently a man isn't TRULY gay until he undertakes that rite of passage known as public sex. I learn something new every day.

So there you have it, straight from the queen's mouth: public sex isn't bad, but busting people for doing it is very bad.

I am gay and I post that story so people do not get the impression that gays are evil just b/c they are gay.

Some people don't know any gay person. They read something like Van Helsing's post and they make alot of assumptions.

By posting your story, aren't you also guilty of making `alot of assumptions' and `impressions' about people who view this site?

You know, G.;

Had I known from the start you were a homosexual, I probably wouldn't have been so hard on you. You see, even at my more advanced age the constant liberal PCascist brainwashing has had at least a small affect on me; I tend to be patronizing to homosexuals.

Don't you find it difficult to swallow that constant radical homosexual whining wins you patronization and destroys respect? Doesn't that make you just a little sick to your stomach? Do you even know the difference in patronization and respect? For example, do you think companies that give $$ to the likes of Jesse Jacksons's Rainbow Coalition do so out of respect or because they're patronizing the bastard to shut him up?

If it's repect you're after, dipwad - you've come to the wrong place.

Van, In The Days: Current news events in the light of biblical prophecy » Gay Rights Group Launches Toilet Paper Campaign Against Florida Mayor.

Oh brother.

Jimbo,

I always thought Jesse Jackson was extorting money whe he did that.

Let's face it - most people only care about themselves and people who are similiar to them.

Let's face it - most people only care about themselves and people who are similiar to them.

G - hat's off. That is, in fact, a truth too many people ignore or try to alter. Birds of a feather and all that stuff. We can get along without getting in each others faces. But to stay out of each other's faces, we must temper pride with reason. When Christian activists "invade" diversity parades they get no respect - they're invaders.

Do you see where I'm going, here?

Jimbo,
I don't think G. has a "hard" time "swallowing" anything. He can even take it up the "back door" in fact he does it every day in his "deep respect for the facts"

What a pathetic loser.

Doug,

Thanks for your civility and respect.

Doug,

Are you one of those laughable hypocrites - you know - straight guys that love gay sex - watching two women get it on?

Thought so.

Get lost.

I wonder if anyone has video of these atrocious acts? If so I think they need to be studied in depth, by me, to determine the true seriousness of this epidemic.

Hey Van Helsing, could you tell that last comment was from me but posted anonymously by accident.

If you need to know, I've watched two women get it on with ME, and indescribable pleasure you will never know.

Please tell us, what is it like to fuck your neighbors poodle?

I meant the only time you were able to get away with it.

Now go back to Mr. Hand.

Leave it up to you vile, bigoted lunatics to believe this hoax.
http://forum.darwincentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=5855

Keep it up, you pseudo-conservative frauds!
You're useful idiots for the moonbats you purport to be against.

Doug,

I knew you loved gay sex. Wow - and in person.

Phony.

Doug,

I had sex with two jock studs at the same time once. I know what you mean about indescribable pleasure - I still remember the details to this day. Hot!

>>Who rapes women?
Heterosexual men do.
Should we discuss the heterosexual problem???
Posted by: G. at July 9, 2007 12:35 PM

This is known as "your words coming back to haunt you".

ac1, I suspected immediately.

I've learned in my short time here that Van Helsing suspects everything immediately.

:-)

Keeps me coming back. :-)

Update: GLAAD Threatened to Sue Memphis TV Station in Attempt to Block Lesbian Gang Report

The source won't be appreciated, but if accurate, is quite "interesting."

Wait a minute! Isn't GLAAD a non-prophet (tax-exempt) entity, as the Methodist Church?

Reason I ask: In a past thread, Dipwad G. Fagboy seemed to take exception to the fact that Churches are tax-exempt... I thought I'd point out another of his hypocrisies.

And Steve - FYI - the source is entirely reliable.

G. said,

"I feel that gay men having sex in a bathroom is disgusting and they should be arrested."

Whats so disgusting about that? Are you ashamed of sex? Just bang on the door and yell at them -or- have the police throw them out. Why would you support a Victorian law for uptight and intolerant people?

Talk about a victimless crime... FASCIST!!!!!!

G is probably suffering brain rot from advanced AIDS and knows there is little time left until G is knocking on the gates of HELL.

AIDS related dimensia is clearly the diagnosis where G is concerned.

(G is for Gay)

I wouldn't mind if you deleted posts from G.

We've seen the gay agenda over and over again during the priest sex abuse scandal. The priests were referred to as "pedophiles" which in the vast majority of cases was wrong. A pedophile is someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent children. The overwhelming majority of victims were post-pubescent boys. Therefore, the priests were not pedophiles. They were simply gay men molesting/raping teenage boys. But, you never heard about the gay priest scandal. It was always the pedophile priest scandal, giving the impression the priests were after any kid under the age of 11. This was not true. They were for the most part, gay men going after teenage boys. Very few pre-pubescent boys were molested and an even smaller number of girls were victimized.

This is a classic case of intentional media disinformation and unfortunately people bought it. They put 2 and 2 together and got 5.

g's going down.

Man, between these lesbian gangs and the covens of satanists murdering thousands of children every year, I don't know how any children make it to adulthood.

fosterdad - you're grasping at the straw that broke the dromedary's back.

you catholic?

I wish y'all would stop it with all of the "gay" comments. G's sexual preference has nothing to do with most of the posts on Moonbattery--on this one, it does--but not most. As I read down the new posts on the front page, his sexual orientation is mentioned repeatedly, even when it has no bearing on his extremist left-wing views. Frankly, it adds nothing to the discussions, and makes us sound like the feces-slinging retards at DailyKos and Atrios, et al.

I'm all for name calling and ad hominems, but damn, give it break.

I'd like to know how reporting this is likely to incite violence against gay people, while exhorting soldiers to kill their officers, and any number of other vile things lefties espouse in their arts and media are just "free expression" worthy of the highest protection.

Just wonderin' is all...