« Lesbian Gangs Behind Schoolgirl Rape Epidemic | Main | Healthcare Under Dems: A Sinking Schip »
July 10, 2007
Keith Ellison: The Muslim–Moonbat Alliance Incarnate
As Power Line puts it, America's first Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison "embodies the Democratic Party's alliance with radical Islam." That the Democrat Party would endorse this alumnus of the rabidly anti-Caucasian and in particular anti-Semitic Nation of Islam confirms that for Dems, any enemy of American civilization is their friend.
If anyone qualifies as an enemy of American civilization, it's Ellison. Here's a guy who led a mob chanting "no justice, no peace" outside a courthouse in support of cop killers. Ellison has been able to downplay his radical background with help from fellow travelers at the Minneapolis Star Tribune, which now reports on how well this Muslim is getting along with atheists:
Freshman Congressman Keith Ellison was among friends Sunday — in this case, a gathering of atheists — so his support for a fistful of hot-button opinions, including the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney, brought enthusiastic nods of approval and standing ovations.
In his speech to more than 100 atheists in suburban Minneapolis, Ellison accused the current administration of "totalitarianism, authoritarianism and dictatorship," called the war to defend Iraq from al-Qaeda and Iranian-backed terror groups an "occupation," sneered at what he calls "the far right of the evangelical Christian movement," and even compared 9/11 to the Reichstag fire.
It isn't easy to find items on the liberal agenda that don't put Dems in direct conflict with Islam: radical feminism vs. burkas and beatings, special privileges for homosexuals vs. executing homosexuals, atheism vs. religious fanaticism imposed by a caliphate, etc. Fortunately for Rep. Ellison the Muslim moonbat, the one factor libs and Islamists have in common — visceral hostility to the American way of life — is the only one that really counts.

Posted by Van Helsing at July 10, 2007 10:45 AM
Comments
Nice pic. I just puked in my mouth.
Posted by: Anonymous at July 10, 2007 11:05 AM
The Democratic party hates radical Islam.
Hillary Clinton and radical Islam - I don't think so.
Also Ellsworth meet with aethists - so how does that make Ellsworth a radical Muslim??
Van Helsing - you can't have it both ways.
This is a feable attempt even for you.
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 11:27 AM
More Hysteria from the right wingers..............
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 11:28 AM
G, please show examples how The Dem party "hates" Radical Islam. The posters on this board can show you examples of how The Dem Party loves, embraces and enables Radical Islam. Need I remind you we as a nation (of straight and gay) people are at war with Radical Islam. Radical Islam will not behead you first because you are a "useful idiot" to Radical Islam against the us, the infidel. But rest assured, you as a gay american are more hated by Radical Islam and will be, if given the opportunity, exterminated when Radical Islam has no more use for you or your kind.
Posted by: Bryherb at July 10, 2007 11:37 AM
Bryherb,
Hillary Clinton said she takes a back seat to no one when it comes to the war against terror.
She is alos big on women's rights - do you think she is aligned with radical Islam?
She is the Dem. frontrunner.
You need to stop looking at things in stark black and white.
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 12:19 PM
G,
You are correct, Hillary never takes a backseat to stopping terror. That's why she voted to go into Iraq, and why she stated that she did independent research on Saddam with her own experts since 1992.
Unfortunately she lacks courage, much like her husband. As soon as it became politically expedient to denigrate the war she quickly forgot all of her independent research and claimed that Bush tricked her into voting for the war.
Maybe that's true that Bush tricked her (I'm willing to ignore her statement on independent research). That would mean that Hillary has been tricked by a lot of people; Bush, her husband, and the McDougals for example. If this woman gets tricked that much with so many important things, I would think that one would shy away from her as the next leader of the free world. Because following the evidence she sure isn't a Nancy Drew.
Posted by: Joshua at July 10, 2007 12:40 PM
- Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left
- Keith Ellison’s Dangerous Liaisons
- Impeachment, Radical Islam & Anti-Semitism
BTW G., I thought you told everyone here `good riddance'?
Posted by: White Cane at July 10, 2007 12:47 PM
Don't forget G, we're laughing AT you not with you.
"progressive capitalist with a deep respect for the facts"
HA HA HA HA HA!
Your husband is calling you, he asked you to bend over and pick up that pencil.
Please, provide us with more entertainment! I want to see more "progressive" commentary with "deep respect" for Moonbat reality.
Posted by: Doug at July 10, 2007 12:48 PM
If Hillary is anything like her husband Bill, And you just know if she is elected president, Bill will have as much say in running the country as Hillary did when Bill was in office. So do I need to point out the dismal failure of Bill Clinton is fighting Radical Islam? I will just for you. WTC I in '93, USS Cole, Khobar Towers, Somalia, Had not 1, not 2, but 3 chances to take out Bin Laden. Just read it in the archives Sandy Burger has in his pants. You need to take off those nice festive rose colored glasses and give them back to Elton John. Sometimes things are simply black and white and liberals need to stop naval gazing and decide whose side they are on and make a decision. Hillary is the front runner now but the election is still far away. Hillary's stance on women's rights, like most liberals, is trumped by multicultualism and I have not heard her raise a stink about how hard line Islamists treat their women. What she says and does are 2 different things. Not a peep about honor killings, women having jobs and being able to drive, female circumcision, etc. You want a real authentic feminist as president? If I want a real authentic feminist as president, I'll write in Tammy Bruce on my ballot in Nov. '08. And you as a gay american should check Tammy Bruce out.
Again, 2nd request, please provide examples how The Dem Party hates or combats Radical Islam. And for every one you show me I will show you 3 how they don't.
Posted by: Bryherb at July 10, 2007 12:53 PM
Joshua,
Anyone who voted to invade Iraq as part of the war on terror made a mistake - it was dumb - and yes - the Bush admin. cooked the books and sold alot of people on the war - including Congress.
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 1:17 PM
Doug,
Eat me.
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 1:18 PM
It's not just liberals who side with Islam.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-fund_thinkjul08,0,2537754.story?coll=chi-newsopinionperspective-hed
And you idiots should knock it off with the "atheist=leftist dhimmi" bullshit. Most atheists I know are pro-capitalist, a bit reactionary and think Islam is a violent religion.
Posted by: Asharak at July 10, 2007 1:34 PM
Dipwad G. Fagboy and Asharak Fudgepacker.
Two peas in a pod.
Posted by: Jimbo at July 10, 2007 2:00 PM
G,
Well then you must admit that Bush is a brilliant man. Not only did he "cook our books" but he must of altered UN reports, British MI5 reports, and intelligence reports from a number of other countries. Some dating well before he took office. The man's a master mind.
Posted by: Anonymous at July 10, 2007 2:11 PM
G,
Well then you must admit that Bush is a brilliant man. Not only did he "cook our books" but he must of altered UN reports, British MI5 reports, and intelligence reports from a number of other countries. Some dating well before he took office. The man's a master mind.
Posted by: Joshua at July 10, 2007 2:13 PM
Doug,
Don't forget to bring your microscope if you change your mind and do want to eat me after all.
A girl can hope, can't he?
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 3:09 PM
Actually, you bigoted, sub-literate Nazi fucktard, I'm completely heterosexual.
Is that the best you can do? ALL of the people who disagree with you can't possibly be gay or liberal. In fact, plenty of the people who post at the forum I've linked to are conservatives and they think you're all morons as well.
By the way, how's that grift-a-thon at "Free" Republic going? LoL!
Posted by: Asharak at July 10, 2007 3:23 PM
In fact, I know of one conservative, Ron Paul, who would not agree with anything on this web site.
I ought to know, everything I learned came from the master himself, Theodore Kosczinski.
Posted by: Asharak at July 10, 2007 3:41 PM
Like I said, is that the best you can do? Pathetic.
And the day you see Kosczinski defended on DC will be a cold day in Hell. A lot of DC'ers even like Rudy Giuliani, who I'm surprised to see the rest of you douchebags supporting because I'd think the fact that he believes gays are human beings would get all of your panties in a bunch.
Posted by: Asharak (the real one) at July 10, 2007 3:47 PM
[Doug,
Don't forget to bring your microscope if you change your mind and do want to eat me after all.
A girl can hope, can't he?]
This was not my post - must be dishonest Doug's.
Posted by: G. at July 10, 2007 3:59 PM
g has lost what was left of something that was supposed to resemble a mind.
Posted by: nanc at July 10, 2007 5:58 PM

