« Slate Ridicules Its Own Enviro-idiocy | Main | Animal Rights Terrorists Continue to Threaten »

Great political dialogue.

What does a bank robber have to do with issues of the environment or politics?

Typical wingnut, chickenhawk stupidity.

Q: Why are the IQs of conservatives so much lower than Progressives?

Which came first - the chickenhawk or the egg?

Man walks into Bank dressed as a tree. Bank employees and patrons each think: "This man must have a disability. He believes that he is a tree. Don't be impolite by looking at him! Act natural." Man robs bank while everyone looks the other way.

Ingeneous!

Ever wonder what someone like Al Gore would post if he were a troll? I direct your attention to the post above.

OT: Moonbat shoots NJ Airman, because he was 'angry at the government' (via LGF)

That first poster is your typical nutso wingnut, the post was an obvious joke but as per usual the wingnut has no sense of humour or reason and misses the point

cod731,

schucks brainiac - thinks for your wisdom.

"Why are the IQs of conservatives so much lower than Progressives?"

Got any proofs to back up that claim? Didn't think so. Proofs are for Republicans; chants, mantras, rhyming slogans, and mindless goosestepping are for democrats.

"schucks brainiac - thinks for your wisdom."

Typical of the left...they exist only to hate, and to make others hate.

NudeGayWhalesForJesus,

Nice generalization.

When we take the WH back in 2008 I will stop being so angry and hateful. You should have seen me before the mid-terms.

As far as IQs go -

I remember flipping TV channels in 2000 and there was an old clip of Reagan and another show had Bill Clinton speaking - I kept flipping back and forth b/t the two and was blown away at the difference b/t these two men's intelligence - Bill Clinton was so much more intelligent.

For IQs - see below: [Nixon is the exception but then he had issues that rendered his high IQ not so helpful]

"The study determined the following IQs of each president as accurate to within five percentage points:

147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
132 Harry Truman (D)
122 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R)
174 John F. Kennedy (D)
126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
155 Richard M. Nixon (R)
121 Gerald Ford (R)
175 James E. Carter (D)
105 Ronald Reagan (R)
098 George HW Bush (R)
182 William J. Clinton (D)
091 George W. Bush (R)"

http://www.georgewalkerbush.net/presidentialiqs.htm

Ha, ha, ha! LOL!!!!

I urge everyone to go to that link G. has so generously supplied at the bottom of his post to back up this IQ study he's quoting! Read it and then at the bottom of that article is another link. The one that reads "This is a hoax." with another url. Click that.

Rich.

Ha, ha, ha!!! G., you are truly a funny person. Not very bright but a source of humor nontheless.

LOL!!!!

Van, this IQ study that is a hoax might even make a good article on how a moonbat will believe anything that confirms their intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself (G., that's a nice way of saying "believe anything that confirms their bigotries").

Certainly rings true though, eh??

Certainly rings true though, eh??

Exactly what a Left-wing Archie Bunker would say, G. You prove my point again.

G do you come here just to prove the point that moonbattery is ignorant?

Kevin,

Republicans and conservatives are notorious for being bigots [just ask your "Base" - rednecks, KKK, neo-nazis, skin heads, Religious fundies].

In your private world up is down, white is black.

Freedom Now,

Wingnuts and chickenhawks are not role models!!! Stop the madness.

Certainly rings true though, eh??

Fake, but accurate.

A hoax - but also maybe close to the truth?

G,

Now that we know it's a hoax, do you have anything else to say? Otherwise....adios.

NudeGayWhalesForJesus,

See ya - don't let the keyboard hit ya on the way out.

Praise cheesses!!!

He could be a deranged English major who has put his reading of MacBeth to practical, although felonious use. Although, in Shakespeare's work, Malcom and his forces use the Birnam wood bit outdoors.

They caught him.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288592,00.html

All's well that ends well.

They caught him.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288592,00.html

They followed the sap.

Fox "News" - eeewwwww

Which came first - the chickenhawk or the egg?

Isn't "chickenhawk" the term for a gay man who goes after young boys? You being a queer, G, should know that. Keep your pedophile references to yourself, sweetheart, m'kay?

G,

So very typical that go spouting that crap about KKK, etc.

Let me ask you a question, have you ever heard of the "Solid South"? Look it up. Look up where the KKK originated. Disgruntled Democrats after the civil war.

Look at the voting record for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 & 1968. Have a look at which party voted for what:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#By_party

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1968#Passage_of_the_bill

Oh, and guess who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Robert "Sheets" Byrd (D) WV.

So don't come here trying to talk the lib mythology to us, we know the facts and you will get schooled everytime Jack.

Crush Liberalism,

Chickenhawk refers to Cheney and Bush - two examples of neo-cons who get deferrments and then send other peoples kid to war.

As far as child molestation goes - heterosexuals know more about that.

As far as child molestation goes - heterosexuals know more about that.

Right...which explains the existence of NAMBLA. Sorry, Sugarbritches, but "chickenhawk" is a term for your kind, not mine.

Crush Liberalism,

NAMBLA is a bizarre, freaky organization that the vast majority of gay people do not even know exist - let alone condone.

NAMBLA has as much to do with gays as Polgamy has to do with straights.

Stop believing all the religious right anti-gay rants. It is not true.

Stop believing all the religious right anti-gay rants. It is not true.

But "heterosexuals are child molesters" is true? Got it. Thanks for the double-standard...er, clarification.

It was to make a point that I can stereotype as well as you.

Then stop throwing a hissy fit about stereotypes, Sister, if you're going to do it, too.

Besides, considering you're striking out with all of your assertions today (see "presidential IQ's", "more Dems served in the military than Republicans" debunked by whoserved.com, etc.), I'd say you may want to avoid more idiotic and demonstrably false assertions. Then again, facts have never been allies of the left.