moonbattery.gif


« Official John Kerry Blogger Promotes 9/11 Conspiracy Lunacy | Main | Gray Lady Explains Burying Major Terror Plot Story »


June 10, 2007

Amanda Marcotte Still Not Taking Her Meds

Hanoi John Kerry's Pamela Leavey isn't the only former official blogger of a prominent Democrat candidate for POTUS to have loose screws rattling around in her head. Remember Amanda Marcotte, whom John Edwards was finally forced to can when her psychotic attacks on Christians became public knowledge? Evidently she hasn't sought the psychiatric treatment that her condition so clearly warrants, because she is still cranking out unhinged moonbattery at her blog Pandagon, where she offers the following advice to her readers:

Break something. Set something on fire. Tonight you can find a way to resist. That asshole with a Bush bumper sticker? It can be removed.

But exhorting the sick freaks in her audience to commit arson and indulge in vandalism pales in comparison with trying to get the loathsome Breck Girl elected President.

Amanda-Marcotte.jpg
Amanda Marcotte, preparing to projectile vomit at a priest.

On a tip from V the K.

Posted by Van Helsing at June 10, 2007 6:53 PM

Comments

frightening thing - these people really exist - they're no longer the ghouls in sci-fi movies of yesteryear - they're here and breathe my air, which, btw, pists me off.

Posted by: nanc at June 10, 2007 9:46 PM

The left believes rooting for the enemy is patriotic. They also believe Amanda Marcotte is hot.

Posted by: V the K at June 11, 2007 4:30 AM

She would be if she did something with her hair. And maybe smiled a bit more...

It's amazing what regular smiling can do to a face, and it's often struck me that many a moonbat looks so freakin ugly because they spend so much time being angry. Seen any recent pictures of the dixie chicks? You can almost taste the anger. Three hags in the making there...

Posted by: Archonix at June 11, 2007 5:25 AM

Let that screwy bitch or one of here screwed up disciples TRY to remove anything from my truck - bumpersticker or otherwise.

Posted by: Jimbo at June 11, 2007 6:23 AM

This is the reason I, a 2nd Amendment guy, have had to modify my stance on gun ownership somewhat in the last 20 or so years. Even in my short lifetime (55 years), I remember a day when sociopaths, violent neurotics, etc. were pretty much relegated to the worst parts of big cities, prisons and mental facilities. Now they are seemingly everywhere, as was well illustrated recently in the days following Jerry Falwell's death. Reading blogs like Pandagon, you'd think you had hooked up with a hotline into a detention center for dysfunctional 14-year-olds. Sure doesn't present a good case for their side...

Posted by: Toa at June 11, 2007 6:26 AM

jimbo, you are really big on threatening to shoot people aren't you? i mean, not a day goes by where you don't threaten bodily harm on someone. Talk about anger...

Posted by: westerberg at June 11, 2007 6:28 AM

jimbo, you are really big on threatening to shoot people aren't you?

Festerburg -

Where in my statement did I threaten to shoot anyone?

Typical liberal dumbass. You still aren't a mind reader.

Posted by: Jimbo at June 11, 2007 7:06 AM

I'm assuming that you are completely overweight and out of shape, and that the only way you could prevent anyone from doing anything is with a pistol in your hand. Maybe I'm wrong, but I doubt it. OK, so you didn't threaten to shoot anyone this time, just most of the time....

Posted by: westerberg at June 11, 2007 7:38 AM

You "assume" wrong. That's why you're a dumbass.

Posted by: Jimbo at June 11, 2007 8:03 AM

I'm assuming that you are completely overweight and out of shape, and that the only way you could prevent anyone from doing anything is with a pistol in your hand.

And if he is, what difference would that make, you asshat. You saying that only people that can engage in hand-to-hand combat should be able to defend themselves or their property? Christ on a crutch, what do you think defends your personal liberty, you moron.

Posted by: Brooklyn Red Leg at June 11, 2007 8:20 AM

No Brooklyn Red Egg

I'm saying that the only way fat, greedy gluttons are able to defend themselves is with a gun. Can't you read? You know those reading comprehension courses you failed in college? Ahhh, who am I kidding, you didn't go to college...

Posted by: westerberg at June 11, 2007 8:53 AM

Can't you read?

This is coming from the guy who just accused Jimbo of threatening to shoot someone? Stones and glass houses and whatnot, dipsh#t.

Posted by: Crush Liberalism at June 11, 2007 10:15 AM

>>>I'm saying that the only way fat, greedy gluttons are able to defend themselves is with a gun.

OK westerburg, how do YOU suggest that self-defence be done? If a 200 lb karate expert with a baseball bat and murder on his mind comes at a 110 lb woman on crutches, would you deny her the use of a gun? I mean it, I want an answer!

By the way, you said in another post that you are NOT an American citizen. Where are you from? what's your loyalties?

PS: since you are NOT an american, I assume that you are not familor with PROPERTY RIGHTS and the RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENCE. How sad for you and your family.

Posted by: KHarn at June 11, 2007 2:06 PM

I am an American citizen. I never said otherwise.

A typical american myth is that america is the only country to offer rights of any kind to its citizens. It's like American invented rights or something...please.

Tell you what...a 110 ten pound woman ON CRUTCHES no less, aginst a 200 pound karate expert has no chance, even with a gun. Most likely the karate guy would take it and shoot her with it, which is what happens in reality. Espescailly, since no training at all is required to own a gun in many places, she'd probably leave it loaded and her three year old daughter would shoot herself with it, or bring it to school. Maybe she'd accidentely shoot herself while cleaning it, or maybe she'd use it to commit suicide. All of these scenarios are MUCH more likely than her actually even being confornted by this 200 pound monster of which you speak. And if there are literally milllions of people running around in the country afraid and ready to shoot this omnipresent bad guy, well I'd say that's a country with some serious problems.


But heck, I really wouldn't mind her having the gun if there were some reasonable procedures and rules for obtaining one.

Posted by: westerberg at June 11, 2007 3:37 PM

>>>A typical american myth...

Pardon me. This is the sort of stuff that made me think you were NOT an American. You write like you are looking at the U.S. from afar.
But back to the subject:

Oh westerburg, you are so right! I guess that's why CRIMINALS are routienly shot by their "victems" who have taken their guns away from them? Those criminals that don't kill themselves while handleing their guns, I mean.
Allright, you admitted that there are MILLIONS of Americans with guns (Machineguns, too) but THEY have not had their guns taken from their hands by criminals who then killed them. They have not accidently killed themselves or others. They have not delibratly gone on killing sprees. Their guns have not jumped out of the drawer, loaded itself and started shooting. So your argument is crap.
I know that you will pull out stuff like Colombine and that son of a bitch in Virginia Tech, but such SMALL PRECENTAGE of incidents only proove you wrong. BECAUSE........
You have to be trained, licensed, registered and taxed to own and operate a motor vehicle, yet there are thousands of wrecks and deaths involving motor vehicles every year. There are even cases where a CAR was used as a MURDER WEAPON.

But you didn't answer the question anyway. You said in the other post (And paraphrased that comment above) that you don't want people to defend themselves with guns. So what's YOUR solution to being attacked?

Go back to your "panic room" where it's safe.

Posted by: KHarn at June 11, 2007 7:56 PM

I'm saying that the only way fat, greedy gluttons are able to defend themselves is with a gun.

Here's hoping you find out real soon what its like to have to defend yourself, westerberg. Hope that black belt you got from your Cracker Jack's Box comes in handy.

You know those reading comprehension courses you failed in college? Ahhh, who am I kidding, you didn't go to college...

Keep trying westerberg. Someday you'll be old enough to get a beer like the rest of us adults.

Posted by: Brooklyn Red Leg at June 11, 2007 8:23 PM

Kharn,

I grew up and lived in America for 30 years, i have lived outside the country for nearly nine years now. I have no desire to move back.


Look up the stats, most gun deaths are results of suicide, and there are thousands of accidental deaths a year. My bet is the majority of incidences where guns are fired by people other than law enforcement officals have little if anything to do with self defence. People who have guns in their homes are much much more likely to be victims of gun violence or accidents than those who don't have guns. Look it up!
ยจ
In most of the civilized world people don't even feel the need to defend themselves with guns. Why is this? Why are americans so afraid of each other? The question is not should we be allowed to carry guns, but what is wrong with a place where people feel such a violent need to possess one. But you don't want to talk about that do you?

Posted by: westerberg at June 12, 2007 2:03 AM

"Colombine and that son of a bitch in Virginia Tech, but such SMALL PRECENTAGE of incidents only proove you wrong. "

I could pull a story from newspapers around the country of some nut job pulling a weapon and shooting innocent people EVERY DAY! Do you have any idea how many CHILDREN have been shot this year alone in a major city like Philadelphia. Look it up! I dare you. That's just ONE city!

Posted by: westerberg at June 12, 2007 5:20 AM