« Canadian MP Wants Bigfoot Listed as Endangered Species | Main | Students Suspended For Wearing Bible Verses »
May 3, 2007
People Time Magazine Wishes Were Most Influential
In the off chance that anyone still takes the left-wing fluff known as Time Magazine seriously, it should be noted that its current list of the 100 most influential people in the world does not include the President of the United States.
The list does include the psychotic moonbat Rosie O'Donnell, who thinks our government blew up the World Trade Center and Iran's kidnapping of British sailors was staged by the West. It also includes the empty skin Barack Hussein Obama, Tinseltown twerp Leonardo DiCaprio, Shrillary Rotten Clinton, and George Clooney, the cheesily handsome Hollyweird narcissist who has focused his career on churning out leftist propaganda watched only by the sort of elitist liberals who write for Time.
I guess Slime meant to call their list The 100 People We Wish Were Most Influential.
On a tip from Metalgarth.
Posted by Van Helsing at May 3, 2007 11:06 AM
Comments
Not a conservative in the bunch! Glad to see TIME is sticking with its usual editorial stance...any dramatic change and I might have a heart attack!
Posted by: Pam at May 3, 2007 11:33 AM
Half those people only got famous by bashing Bush, I'd say they'd be no where if not for him.
and DiCaprio? wtf? How's he more influential than the leader of the free world?
Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at May 3, 2007 12:04 PM
DiCaprio is an ACTOR who embraces the global warming cause. Need I say more?
Posted by: Pam at May 3, 2007 12:33 PM
Half the nitwits on this list are entertainers. How are they influential pretending to be something they aren't? Oh, I forgot. They are also Bush-hating, Gaia-worshipping, kool-aid drinkers.
I think they know they are nothing more than jesters that we overpay to entertain us, so they inject themselves into current comtemporary debate in order to feel important and relevant.
Silly jesters.
Posted by: Ed at May 3, 2007 1:26 PM
Now I'm going to have to go find Time's circulation numbers for the past 3 decades. It has been proven that leftard proles can't be bothered to financially support the moonbattery that they wish upon actual, working adults. I'd imagine that Time's numbers are worse than the periodical industry as a whole.
Posted by: skh.pcola at May 3, 2007 3:34 PM
Time? Soon to be bankrupt and forgotten. It's already nothing more than bird cage liner or fire starter for the fireplace.
Posted by: George B. at May 3, 2007 3:59 PM
Speaking on behalf of all Movie Moonbats at an Academy Awards ceremony, George cLooney remarked on the widespread accusation that Smellywood is out of touch with Mainstream America, saying that this was actually a good thing to be. This "news" rag proves, for the kajillionth time, that there is no real line between the "news" industry and Smellywood.
Posted by: Toa at May 3, 2007 6:43 PM
look around - it's sad, but true - these moonbats influence more people than ANY decent person does - even our 15 year old son will say, "what is it with kids these days?"
i have a "boycott hollywood" post for a solid month and send the money you save to the conservative presidential nominee of your choice at curtains - i'm sick of being led about by the few.
Posted by: nanc at May 3, 2007 7:27 PM
Hmmm, well what can one expect of a silly, libtard rag like Time magazine?
Michael Ramirez in another one of his outstanding editorial cartoons has something to say about Time magazine...
Posted by: juandos at May 4, 2007 5:46 AM
VH: Upon looking at the cover of Slime, my first thought was: "It's the 100 Worst People in the World" issue. Oh, goody, goody! Can't wait to read it.
Any magazine featuring actors, mullahs, liberal politicians (Flash-in-the-pan, empty suit B. Hussein Obama? Influential? Really?) and Fruitcake #1, algore hissef', on the cover must have a death-wish.
As George B. notes, it is damn good for lining your bird cage or starting a fire, but you can also use it to teach your children about the people and things in this world that need to be changed (Lord knows, they'll get plenty of the dark side in K-12 and college, basically schools of "higher indoctrination").
Posted by: jc14 at May 4, 2007 7:01 AM
I don't care what anyone thinks of him. When creating a list like this, how can THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD not be included? Pretty sure he has some "influence." Amazing!!!
Posted by: Uh. . . at May 5, 2007 10:55 AM
