moonbattery.gif


« John Ashton, Envirocrusading Bureauweenie | Main | Sean Penn Denounces the Moisture of America's Blood-Soaked Underwear »


March 26, 2007

Gaiaist Master Plan

Compliments of V the K, here's an idea of what the USA will look like if envirokooks have their way. The tiny pale blue areas indicate where we will have the right to use our own property:

wildlandsgoalmap.jpg

Posted by Van Helsing at March 26, 2007 7:13 AM

Comments

Seattle - gone, St. Louis - gone, New Orleans - gone, Denver - gone, Portland OR - gone, Louisville - gone, Topeka - gone, The agricultural lands of the Midwest - gone, and I guess the rest of us are herded into biospheres on those little patches of blue so we can live without toilet paper or decent food, like third-worlders or those Gaian idiots in Manhattan from the previous thread.

Meanwhile, we can wave to Al Gore and Arianna Huffington as they fly over in their private jets, laughing their asses off at us.

Posted by: V the K at March 26, 2007 7:50 AM

It also looks like Washington DC is gone too. Is that a bad thing?

Posted by: metalgarth at March 26, 2007 8:11 AM

What are those 2 huge patches of blue/green in Western Virginia near the Kentucky border/under West Virginia?

Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at March 26, 2007 8:23 AM

Guess I'd better pack my duds and head for northern Utah before everyone else does...

Posted by: Pam at March 26, 2007 8:38 AM

Haven't read through the entire account, but check this site:
http://www.uhuh.com/1calfraud/stacks/judymusin.htm

Posted by: Hope at March 26, 2007 9:01 AM

The green patches in Virginia and Utah are where the people live who made up this map.

Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at March 26, 2007 9:08 AM

Holy christ! WTF do they expect us to do, live in arcologies? Great, guess we need to get used to 'condo' living. So much for purchasing any land to keep people at bay.

Posted by: Brooklyn Red Leg at March 26, 2007 9:43 AM

What kind of a government would it take to force people to accept this? Certainly not the government of a free country.

Posted by: kevin at March 26, 2007 11:09 AM

Gaia is jealous goddess. She detests freedom. If we are to be 'One Nation Under Gaia,' we can no longer be a Free Country.

Posted by: V the K at March 26, 2007 12:33 PM

Its silly. No government would actually implement such a plan or they would be strung up from nearest tree.

Though it is a good example of extreme environmental moonbattery....

Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at March 26, 2007 7:04 PM

remake of "waterworld"?

i heard it was bad the first time around...

Posted by: nanc at March 26, 2007 8:52 PM

Ah, "Waterworld", the king of the moonbat enviro-nut wacko movies. It even beats Al Gore by a mile with his movie.

If all the polar ice caps melted sea levels would rise a maximum of 250 feet, while in that movie they rose 28,000+ feet to cover all but the top of Mt. Everest.

If the movie had been set on another planet where such a thing much plausibly happen it might have been a decent movie. But moonbattery too over from the opening credits on.

Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at March 27, 2007 7:08 AM

Ah, "Waterworld", the king of the moonbat enviro-nut wacko movies. It even beats Al Gore by a mile with his movie.

If all the polar ice caps melted sea levels would rise a maximum of 250 feet, while in that movie they rose 28,000+ feet to cover all but the top of Mt. Everest.

If the movie had been set on another planet where such a thing much plausibly happen it might have been a decent movie. But moonbattery took over from the opening credits on.

Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at March 27, 2007 7:11 AM

Ah, "Waterworld", the king of the moonbat enviro-nut wacko movies. It even beats Al Gore by a mile with his movie.

If all the polar ice caps melted sea levels would rise a maximum of 250 feet, while in that movie they rose 28,000+ feet to cover all but the top of Mt. Everest.

If the movie had been set on another planet where such a thing much plausibly happen it might have been a decent movie. But moonbattery took over from the opening credits on.

Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at March 27, 2007 7:16 AM

that beared repeating, mr. ripper...

Posted by: nanc at March 27, 2007 3:36 PM

It doesn't involve taking private land so much, though Kelo already makes that possible. In the beginning it is just a matter of restricted use. The beach is roped off to protect plovers. A chain goes up across the road to the boat launch. Signs appear: "No dogs Allowed" or "No Overnight Camping". It goes a little at a time. The goal is to turn flyover country into a giant theme park that is only open to the government elite. Too bad about your ranch. It's typical guvverment doublespeak, "Public" land doesn't mean that the public will be allowed to use it.

Posted by: Paul Moore at March 27, 2007 6:12 PM