« IPCC's Summary Report Violates Basic Scientific Principles | Main | Body Integrity Identity Disorder: What Progressives Are Progressing Toward »
February 4, 2007
Gaiaists Ought to Welcome Global Warming Apocalypse
The frightening predictions incessantly bellowed at us regarding our planet's doom as a result of global warming are unlikely to come true — which is too bad, from the point of view of the Gaia-worshipers who want us to believe them. Pat at BelchSpeak explains:
If you believe in global warming, you are most likely someone who does not believe in God. If you do not believe in God, you most likely equate human life as equivalent to that of common animals. And if you believe in the equivalency of life, you are most likely to best impact the reduction of green house gases by ceasing to exhale. After all, animals don't drive cars or consume manufactured goods. If you really believe, then logically, you have to make the ultimate sacrifice for your God, Gaea. That is the only way to be truly carbon neutral.
If you believe in Global warming, you should not be angry at deaths in Iraq. You should applaud the deaths of every victim of hurricane Katrina. You should oppose the rebuilding of New Orleans. The boxing day tsunami is the greatest mass carbon neutral event in the past century.
And if global warming is indeed true, then you should applaud the approaching floods, famine and droughts. They will only accelerate the carbon neutrality of greedy CO2 exhalers. Eventually enough CO2 exhalers should die to bring the world back into balance, right?
How many CO2 exhalers need to be carbon-neutralized? University of Texas professor Eric Pianka hopes that disease will cause 90% of the human population to die — and other progressives applaud him for it.
There's no need to be troubled by this. After all, as PETA president Ingrid Newkirk famously proclaimed:
A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.
Why get choked up about 5.8 billion dead rats?
Don't expect environmentalists to be any more truthful about their hatred of human life than they are about global warming. According to them, it's those of us who don't think envirogenocide is such a great idea who hate life. To quote Pentti Linkola, a Finnish environmentalist who compares humanity to a sinking ship with 100 passengers and lifeboat space for only ten:
Those who hate life try to pull more people on board and drown everybody. Those who love and respect life use axes to chop off the extra hands hanging on the gunwale.
Needless to say, Linkola, Al Gore, and the other priests of environmentalism will be the last to go. They're needed in the lifeboat, to chop off our hands.
When Muslims boast that they're going to win their war of annihilation against the West because "you love life and we love death," they clearly aren't talking to environmentalists, followers of the world's first and hopefully last religion based on hatred of humanity.
Posted by Van Helsing at February 4, 2007 3:42 PM
Comments
Just fyi: There are atheists who are pro-morality, pro-human, pro-development, pro-America, anti-PETA and anti-Gaia-religion. One of them has a manifesto here: http://econot.com/page4.html
Posted by: Calarato at February 4, 2007 4:05 PM
Thankfully, "global warming" is slowly being recognized for the ginormous scam it is. It took Al Gore and then the UN to wake us up to the latest stupid leftist guilt-trip. Ironically, some were taking global warming seriously until these morons took it over as their pet issue of the decade.
As soon as Al and the others stop flying their private jets around the world to go to meetings on global warming, I'll give the issue another look. Until then, think I'll drive my SUV, with no passengers, over to the supermarket to pick up one can of soda. Or not. Maybe I'll just drive around for the fun of it. 13 MPG.
Posted by: Mega at February 4, 2007 6:24 PM
VH,
Thanks for the pingback. Wow. The chopping off of the extra hands reference is horrifying! Awesome post.
Posted by: BelchSpeak at February 4, 2007 8:43 PM
