« Babies Killed For Stem Cells | Main | Moonbat Court Allows Palestinians to Sue Israeli Military »
December 12, 2006
Scientist Discovers How to Cut Greenhouse Emissions in Half
One person relieved to see the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lightening up on the global warming hysteria is scientist Fred Singer, who is living proof that the supposed scientific consensus on humans making the planet heat up exists only in the minds of moonbats.
The IPCC halved worst-case estimates for the rise in sea levels by 2100 from 34 to 17 inches. Meanwhile, a completely unhinged Al Gore has been bellowing that the sea will rise by 20 feet.
A rising sea level is to be expected even without SUVs — or far more potent cow farts. As Singer observes:
Sea levels have been rising steadily since the peak of the last Ice Age about 18,000 years ago. The total rise has been 400 feet.
Singer is coauthor of the book Unstoppable Global Warming — Every 1,500 Years, which documents how the Earth warms in regular solar-linked cycles. He notes that there are two ways environmentalists could cut greenhouse gases in half: collapse the world economy, or kill off 50% of the world's population. Let's hope liberals aren't listening.
On a tip from Bergbikr.
Posted by Van Helsing at December 12, 2006 2:40 PM
Comments
I don't have a crystal ball to consult, but something tells me that if the global economy does collapse, 50% of the worlds population would probably end up dead as a result of the crises.
Posted by: Metalgarth at December 12, 2006 2:59 PM
Well, there you go, that should cut greenhouse gases by 75%. 50% by the collapse, and 50% of that by a 50% reduction in the population.
I don't understand why these people can't grasp the possibility that the Earth and sun have natural phases of warming and cooling. Rush likes to say that the environmental movement is the new home of the commies and such.
If they are actually ignoring this possibility, it only lends credence to the claim that they are a bunch of anti-capitalilst, anti-freedom moonbats.
They look as foolish as the Truthers who refuse to acknowledge the obvious that the WTC towers collapses because of the plane impacts and the resulting fires.
Posted by: Steve at December 12, 2006 4:34 PM
And in the name of the Holy Environment, Another Moonbat "Scientist" Recommends Genocide, Beginning With the Most Productive.
War, Pestilence, and Famine, three of the horsemen of the apocalypse, can bring about a reduction in the human population. But these kill on a scale of tens of millions, which is not enough to solve the problem of over-population. And they are most brutal in the ways they kill. Consequently, let us consider the alternative.
The world's most affluent populations should be targeted first. According to the 2006 Living Planet Report, the six populations that have the biggest per capita ecological footprint live in the United Arab Emirates, the United States of America, Finland, Canada, Kuwait, and Australia.
Why don't these Eco-Nazis with a bent toward reducing human population begin with a mass suicide of their own cultists? I'll chip in for the Kool-Aid.
Posted by: V the K at December 12, 2006 5:20 PM
Gotta love the Looney Left. They want us to decrease our living standards by 50% else global warming might reduce our living standards by 5%.
Posted by: Marvin at December 12, 2006 6:52 PM
The proof that Global Warming hysteria is a farce is that none of these nuts like Al Gore are protesting in the streets of China and India to protest their exploding economies and huge increases in CO2 production. The attacks and protests are instead are aimed at Western nations only.
Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at December 12, 2006 7:29 PM
