« City College of New York Honors Cop-Killer, Terrorist | Main | Scientist Discovers How to Cut Greenhouse Emissions in Half »

Thanks V the H. As someone else put it, if you can vivisect embryos for spare parts, abort viable fetuses in utero by scrambling their brains, and shut off your comatose wife's life support when you're done suing the hospital, there's really nothing left standing between you and dismembering live babies for organs.

Once again, baby != zygote. No one is for dissecting babies to conduct research. The baby-killer rhetoric is so over the top I can't help but to crack up every time I hear it.

Wake up fools.

Read the article, WUF. We are literally talking about ripping babies limb from limb so that their bone marrow can be extracted for scientific research. Condescending smirks don't make it less evil.

Only if WUF's mama had this done to him the world would be a better place...

Just to clarify something. About 40 weeks after conception, a human baby is born.

WUF says it's a zygote. Call it an embryo, call it an unborn baby, call it whatever. The fact remains that about 40 weeks after conception, a human baby is born. If you destroy the zygote/embryo/unborn baby/whatever, there will be no baby born.

It doesn't matter what you call it, it is what it is. If it makes you feel better about destroying it by calling it a zygote, well, good for you. Apparently the logic involved in understanding that a small mass of cells develops into a fully formed human baby is too much for you.

i would rather die than to have an innocent harmed so that i may live - what kind of life would my mind have knowing harm came to someone who had no choice in the matter?

besides that, God is the lifegiver.

Steve, apparently concepts mean nothing to you. Baby's contain carbon, so according to you it doesn't matter if we call them carbon.

Or maybe it's time-differentiated concepts that you don't grasp. "Hey, look at the butterfly!" exclaimed Steve, pointing to a caterpillar.

"Baby" has a definition. Look it up. It's different from "zygote". It's also different from "sperm" and "egg". You say "it is what it is". My point exactly. Too bad you can't seem to grasp it.

WUF, if you had taken the time to read the article, you would see that a hospital in the Ukraine is being investigated for the possibility of killing healthy newborn BABIES in order to harvest their stem cells. That is the point of this post. Precious, isn't it?

"Look, it's a troll!" exclaimed Steve, pointing to Wake up fools.

He really showed me.

I know, DFTT.

He really showed me.

Given your sheepish reply, I guess I did. Consider the clue I gave you an early Christmas present.

I wonder if the Troll is in favor of partial birth abortion. If so, one has to wonder why he would have any objection to harvesting marrow, stem cells, and other useful parts from babies aborted in the third trimester.

Not to mention, what the idiotic troll won't admit, is that it's precisely left-wing immorality about harvesting embryonic stem cells for research that has created the market for stem cells that leads to live babies being butchered for them. If human life were respected and valued in all its forms by all people, this butchery would not be happening.

Somewhere in Hell, Hitler is smiling. The Left is only a one or two steps away from picking up where he left off.