« Botched Joke Still Wants to Be Prez | Main | British Soldier Banned From Harrods on Remembrance Day »
November 20, 2006
Moonbat Math
Math isn't warm and fuzzy enough for moonbats, so they have found a substitute to teach children. Called "fuzzy math," it takes the emphasis off drills and memorization and wanders off into touchy-feel theories about how children must find their own path to the answer. Unsurprisingly, it doesn't work.
One Seattle area mother complains:
When my oldest child, an A-plus stellar student, was in sixth grade, I realized he had no idea, no idea at all, how to do long division, so I went to school and talked to the teacher, who said, "We don't teach long division; it stifles their creativity."
As a result of flaky educators putting moonbattery ahead of insensitive 2+2=4 kind of stuff, the math skills of American kids lag way behind other parts of the world. Observes R. James Milgram, a math professor at Stanford:
There's increasing understanding that the math situation in the United States is a complete disaster.
But that's only the point of view of a mathematician. The educrats who design curriculums prefer dreamy theories about students constructing their own problem-solving strategies to boring multiplication tables. Consequently parents who want their kids to learn math are forced to hire tutors.
It's not that they aren't getting anything at all for the zillions of tax dollars that keep public schools afloat. The kids may not learn long division, but at least they're taught how to put condoms on cucumbers and all about the racist horrors of American capitalist exploitation.

On a tip from V the K.
Posted by Van Helsing at November 20, 2006 7:48 AM
Comments
And yet the GOP proclaims it's "the education party", increasing government control over this important industry at every turn. It's sickening to watch the Dems and GOP duke it out over which party can more completely socialize education.
Maybe it's time to vote Libertarian?
Posted by: BigGovGOP at November 20, 2006 8:24 AM
If the Libertarian party had a remotely realistic foreign policy, I would consider it.
Posted by: Metalgarth at November 20, 2006 8:33 AM
Henceforth, there is to be no testing oneself against the best, with the possibility, even the likelihood, of failure: instead, one is perpetually to immerse oneself in the tepid bath of self-esteem, mutual congratulation, and benevolence toward all. -- Theodore Dalrymple
Posted by: Anonymous at November 20, 2006 8:38 AM
Maybe it's time to vote Libertarian?
Hm, vote for a party that thinks all of society's problems can be solved with open borders and full scale drug legalization? I don't think so.
Posted by: V the K at November 20, 2006 8:52 AM
Remember California tried a 'new math' 20 years ago? It was a bust. California continues to be the land of 'fruit and nuts', and it appears that most of them are in education.
Posted by: pocomoco at November 20, 2006 9:03 AM
Currently, the education system has just one goal: It is to dumb-down our children to the extent that when they become adults, they will incapable of thinking and reasoning for themselves.
Any takers on this post care to guess why??? You will get an 'A' if you come up with the right answer. (no peeking now!)
Posted by: Anonymous at November 20, 2006 9:20 AM
Hm, vote for a party that thinks all of society's problems can be solved with open borders and full scale drug legalization? I don't think so.
I think they're the party that thinks most of society's problems can be solved by reducing the size and scope of government, which clearly runs in direct opposition to the GOP, the party of Big Government.
Posted by: V the final Battle at November 20, 2006 9:52 AM
Don't blame the Republicans or Democrats, but the educrats (who, more often than not, vote Democrat, BTW).
My youngest, who is in 5th grade, flunked math last sememster, which upset me terribly. When I looked at an example of a quiz she had failed, I couldn't believe the convoluted method she used to multiply two- and three-digit numbers! Contrary to popular belief, not all Republicans are rich and I cannot afford a tutor. However, I've begun teaching her the way I learned (before self-important educators decided to re-invent the wheel). I anticipate her getting a higher grade in math this semester.
Instead of worrying about hurt feelings if students have a hard time "getting" math, they should be worrying about why the heck Japan and other countries are leaving us behind in math and science.
Posted by: Pam at November 20, 2006 11:56 AM
Pam, can you describe this convoluted method? I want to see what they are teaching.
And let's not forget that math can be culturally sensitive. Some kids might be offended when you ask them what 6 x 5 is.
If Tito has $1,000, and crack is $15/oz, how many...
Posted by: Steve at November 20, 2006 12:55 PM
Pam, the incentives created by a socialized education system guarantee these kinds of results. Therefore, you should blame those who continue to expand and foster government control over this industry: the GOP first and foremost, the Democrats just behind.
Stop deluding yourself into believing that the GOP is anything other than the party of big government. Until education is privatized, government will continue turning kids like yours into drooling half-wits.
Posted by: V the final Battle at November 20, 2006 1:49 PM
V: While I agree that big government certainly doesn't help, I think that our educational system has taken on a life of its own. Unless parents take a more active role, not much will change. (Incidentally, my older daughter is a whiz in math. She said she didn't understand much of the basics the way she was taught either, but said she came up with her own system. Unfortunately, my younger daughter was unable to do so.)
Steve, I'll try to shoot you an e-mail later...I don't have the paper in front of me (I'm at work), and I have to actually look at it to describe it.
Posted by: Pam at November 20, 2006 2:05 PM
gud enuf skooling.
yup! we wouldn't want to harm the fragile egos of our children by teaching them the basics.
Posted by: nanc at November 20, 2006 2:13 PM
I don't like the GOP either, but I think Libertarians are not only not viable, but just plain nuts. I would have considered myself a Libertarian in college, but their philosophy is far too materialistic, and far too detached from reality for me to support.
I'll just continue to be a straight up small government Conservative. The current GOP isn't advancing conservatism or small government, but the Libertarian alternative of chasing some kind of open-border, drug-addled, matierialistic utopia doesn't appeal to me either.
Posted by: V the K at November 20, 2006 3:52 PM
Tell me what a politico-economic philosophy has to offer aside from materialism (i.e., wealth creation)? It sounds like you'd eschew sound economics in place of screwball notions of "spiritual wellness", ala Iranian theocracy.
And the search for government-created utopia was championed by the Marxists, not the Libertarians, you ignoramus. And the GOP is a much bigger proponent of othodox Marxism than is the LP.
Finally, please read any publication detailing the costs/benefits of the Drug War. Just a few sentences. Anything. Try to reach a level of analysis deeper than "drugs are bad make them illegal".
Posted by: V the final Battle at November 20, 2006 4:14 PM
As yet, no one has suggeted why the education system wants to turn our children into half-wits, thereby making them into adults incapable of thinking and reasoning for themselves.
Come on, I know your out there. I know you can do it. And the answer is..........
Posted by: Anonymous at November 20, 2006 4:56 PM
i know...
Posted by: nanc at November 20, 2006 5:49 PM
Fuzzy math is the polite phrase used to characterize wishful economic projections. How pathetically tragicomic.
Posted by: Rod at November 20, 2006 10:36 PM
Try to reach a level of analysis deeper than "drugs are bad make them illegal".
How about this: I'm a licensed foster parent and I've witnessed first-hand the devastation drug use wreaks on families and children.
If a drug decriminalization scheme also included the caveats that drug use disqualified the user from partaking of any government benefits (welfare, student loans, et c), protected an employer's right to screen and fire drug users, and had provisions for removing children from the custody of drug users, then I would consider it. But such measures are considered 'Draconian' by the legalization crowd.
I'll agree that the Drug War is being fought inefficiently and too expensively. Were it up to me, I'd simply have the government buy a few tons of cocaine on the open market, cut it with anthrax, and then turn it loose through the usual channels. And do something similar with heroin and crystal meth. Not only would it solve the drug problem quickly and inexpensively, it would also rid out society of millions of parasites including a number of elected officials.
The drug legalization crowd acts like like legalizing everything is a panacea for all of society's problems. It isn't. It's just an exchange of one set of problems --- an expensive, intrusive counter-narcotics effort ---- for another set of problems --- social devastation, increased health costs, and ruined families.
Yet, I also oppose drinking ages. I'm funny that way.
Posted by: V the K at November 21, 2006 6:29 AM
Were it up to me, I'd simply have the government buy a few tons of cocaine on the open market, cut it with anthrax, and then turn it loose through the usual channels. And do something similar with heroin and crystal meth. Not only would it solve the drug problem quickly and inexpensively, it would also rid out society of millions of parasites including a number of elected officials.
As I suspected, you'd sooner murder millions of people than tolerate them living their lives in ways you disapprove.
How pathetic.
Posted by: V the final Battle at November 21, 2006 11:43 AM
As yet, no one has suggested why the education system wants to turn our children into half-wits, thereby making them into adults incapable of thinking and reasoning for themselves.
Come on, I know your out there. I know you can do it. And the answer is..........
HINT: The same reason they want the millions of uneducted illegal Mexicans to become citizens.
No excuse now!
Posted by: Anonymous at November 21, 2006 1:11 PM
You libs crack me up...always causing problems and then blaming others for them.
You want to raise taxes, increase government programs, create socialized medicine, put the government in charge of everything, and then say "The GOP is the party of Big Government".
You want to "tone down" education, make it touchy-feely, make it soft and easy. You want to do away with red pens because it makes the kids feel bad, do away with tag because someone might get tagged, do away with anything where someone might lose, and then proclaim "The GOP is ruining our schools, the children don't know how to think and act for themselves."
You want to raise the minimum wage, send more money overseas, put everyone on the government's teat, and then proclaim "The GOP wastes too much money and causes inflation."
Why don't you liberal folks just sit back and let us handle things? Why do you want to try and worry yourselves about things like thinking and working? Just relax, let your betters fix your mistakes while you go play quietly in the corner.
Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at November 21, 2006 3:08 PM
Still, as yet, no one has suggested why the education system wants to turn our children into half-wits, thereby making them into adults incapable of thinking and reasoning for themselves.
Well, I'll have to give you the answer. And the answer is:
Uneducated people vote Democrat.
Posted by: Anonymous at November 21, 2006 5:02 PM

