« Al Franken Considers Ultimate Insult to the U.S. Senate | Main | Qana: A Hezbollywood Production? »

If he submits to Islam he can screw this or this to his hearts content which is really what he's after.

Do you think he would volunteer to screw this? Oh, sorry, that's his Castro-Chavez loving wife. I meant this.

Of course, he would first have to be successful at creating a hybrid.

I wonder how he'll react when he discovers that he can't create the chimphuman.

Its our destiny! One day these words will be uttered in the New York City area circa 3955 A.D. " Get Your Stinkin' Paws Off Me You Damn Dirty Ape! "

Oooh, a little man on ape lovin, staring Mr. Heston.

So, what...now anyone who accepts evolution is a moonbat too?

Yeah, this guy's a nut. You don't have to lump a whole lot of rational people in with him simply on the basis of their theory of origins.

As Bart Simpson once said, "God Shmod, I want my monkey-man!"

So, what...now anyone who accepts evolution is a moonbat too?

No, but someone who advocates purposely creating hybrids between highly divergent species for the sole purpose of annoying his christian neighbours is.

There's a meme that humans and chimps share 99%+ of our dna, based on early studies that took what are now considered to be very small samples. More recent studies have shown that we diverge by 5% or more, which places the chimp at the same level as a whole bunch of other animals that nobody claims is even remotely related to us. So much for that. :)

this guy is probably viewed as an intellect by his peers. Lol. He probably sleeps pretty good knowing that. Lmao.

Shark week is so much more entertaining than listening to these kooks.

So, what...now anyone who accepts evolution is a moonbat too?

Prince of Leaves — no offense, but the idea that human life is nothing more than the result of a series of accidents occurring in a void without any intelligent design is the most preposterous concept I have ever heard taken seriously by grown adults.

If the discovery channel endorses this project, next years shark week should be quite interesting.

Both evolution and intelligent design can be true at the same time. Humans today call it genetic engineering.

I doubt the young Earth creationist theory in the same way I doubt the unguided random evolution theory. Both are remotely possible but I think theyre unlikely. If you study the way human reproduction occurs in depth the complexity of the process is mind boggling - the sequence of events must be a complete process from the start - if one step is missing the whole process collapses.

Things like the human eye which many say evolved from a light sensitive mole to the biological equivalent of a highspeed camera is amazing.

Now its possible modern humans were created relatively recently and the place was what some refer to as Eden, but everything prior to that would have been a long term genetic experiment where increasingly complex organisms were created based in the success or failure of previous creations. It could explain things like the Cambrian explosion where large numbers of species seemingly appeared out of nowhere with no ancestors.

Im sure that over the next 1,000 years (if humans are still around) human scientists will be creating life of its own that looks nothing like what we see today - perhaps on worlds like Mars, moons of Jupiter and Saturn. On a small scale they are already doing it with generically modified crops and lower life forms.

The subject is fascinating regardless of which view you hold.

I hate agreeing with moonbats, but sometimes I have to. Intelligent Design is an oxymoron. There is nothing rational or realistic in the argument. Sure, evolution w/out intelligent design is a hard pill to swallow too. Evolution, though, is more than just a theory. It is scientifically evidenced. Can we say the same for intelligent design?

Perhaps the truth lies somewhere inbetween. I don't believe in any form of religion, but I haven't completely ruled out that some sort of higher power, sentient or not, may exist. I protect a persons right to free religious practice, but not when that condemns my sons right to education (ie. taking evolution out of schools) I am an agnostic, and I sent my son to church camp and youth group so that he could experience it for himself and make his own decision. Without any influence from me, he made the decision that it didn't make sense and stopped going. Logic prevails over social pressures, it's natural. It may make you feel good to believe in something, but not at the expense of rational thought.

Intelligent design of some kind doesn't need to be scientifically proven because it's intuitively obvious. This doesn't mean species don't evolve. It just means that evolution is a process, not an explanation.

I agree Van H, and evolution being part of the process has to be taken into account. If we can just get both sides to concede that we may have come from monkeys and fish and whatever but at the same time it wasn't just a random occurence and there was some sort of planned evolution... then maybe we could focus on discovering the real truth.

Personally, I believe in Humorous Design: the very existence of such absurd creatures as the Giraffe, the Duck Billed Platypus, and the Tenured Lefty Intellectual argues the existence of a Creative Force with a powerful (and low) sense of humor.

ionolsen43 I like your site dental insurance sc dental insurance sc
uk insurance uk insurance
car accidents rate car accidents rate
life insurance life insurance
auto insurance nj auto insurance nj
health insurance nj health insurance nj