« International Bureauweenies Attack Second Amendment | Main | DHS Pervert Suffers From BDS »
June 20, 2006
Environmentalists for Mass Death
Today's Human Events piece by Deroy Murdock on the genocidal inclinations of the environmental movement includes a few quotes that should make your hair stand on end.
University of Texas biologist Eric Pianka, who has been publicly dreaming that airborne Ebola could wipe out 90% of the human race:
Things are gonna get better after the collapse because we won't be able to decimate the Earth so much. And, I actually think the world will be much better when there's only 10 or 20% of us left.
Brenna McConnell of Texas Lutheran University on Pianka:
He's a radical thinker, that one! I mean, he's basically advocating for the death of all but 10% of the current population! And at the risk of sounding just as radical, I think he's right.
Rebecca Calisi of University of Texas at Arlington:
There is no denying the natural world would be a better place without people. ALL people!
William Burger, Curator Emeritus for botany at Chicago's Field Museum of Science:
Surely, the Black Death was one of the best things that ever happened to Europe: elevating the worth of human labor, reducing environmental degradation, and, rather promptly, producing the Renaissance. From where I sit, Planet Earth could use another major human pandemic, and pronto!
Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola, who compares humanity to a sinking ship with 100 passengers and only room in the lifeboat for ten:
Those who hate life try to pull more people on board and drown everybody. Those who love and respect life use axes to chop off the extra hands hanging on the gunwale.
I wouldn't have thought it possible, but antihuman environmentalists are developing an ideology even more evil than communism.
Posted by Van Helsing at June 20, 2006 3:54 PM
Comments
Hmm...
Who was it that said, "those who hate me love death"?
Oh, right. It was WISDOM. (Proverbs 8.36)
Posted by: The Random Yak at June 20, 2006 4:15 PM
I'm here to educate you about the greatest threat to mankind.....
MANBEARPIG.
Manbearpig roams the earth alone. It's half man, half bear, and half pig.
I'm super, super cereal.
Fjordman wasn't the first to predict this, but it's a good read. Leftist dupes, beware. We've got your number.
The death of hard Marxsim and the birth of soft Marxism and environmental fascism.
Posted by: Doug at June 20, 2006 4:55 PM
Of course it'll all just be a drop in the bucket when the L&S opens up His can of Heavenly whoop-ass come Judgment Day.
Posted by: The Right Reverend Rabbi Judah at June 20, 2006 5:24 PM
Presumably, these environazis assume that environazis will be exempted from the great die-off.
Posted by: V the K at June 20, 2006 5:40 PM
Exactly, V the K. Of course, we know who'll really be Saved when the ice starts to melt.
Posted by: The Right Reverend Rabbi Judah at June 20, 2006 5:49 PM
I'm bothered by the fact that these people who care so much are unwilling to take the first step and make themselves extinct.
Posted by: Steve at June 20, 2006 6:13 PM
Steve... you beat me to it. But as with everything else, liberal moonbats exempt themselves from the horrors they would so easily inflict on the rest.
What's next? Support for a nuclear holocaust?
Posted by: Anonymous at June 20, 2006 8:27 PM
Reminds me of that movie "12 Monkeys" where the scientists decides humanity needs to be erased and goes around the worlds airports unleasing a killer virus. Thats probably where these kooks got the idea. Fortunately they are probably so brain dead from smoking weed that they couldnt even begin to figure out a way to carry out their insane plans.
Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper at June 20, 2006 8:51 PM
In other words, the meek won't inherit the earth but the arrogant will?
After all, we need someone to oversee the death chambers...
Posted by: Pam at June 20, 2006 10:20 PM
We sane people sit around wondering what makes crazy people crazy, while crazy people sit up all night finding ways to get crazier. We'll never catch up.
Posted by: The Panday at June 20, 2006 11:38 PM
I agree with most of your anti-moonbattery attacks. However, on this point, more radical Environmentalists are correct. There is no doubt that we are fudging up the planet and that there are too many of us. Sad, but true; if we were decimated, the rest of the planet would probably be better off.
Posted by: Patrick at June 21, 2006 8:19 AM
Well Patrick...within the year, the planet will have approached and/or surpassed 6.66 billion wastes of protoplasm..."the number of man", which is a census... (not A specific man as some interpret Revelation).
Talk about opening a can of whoop-ass!
Posted by: Jael at June 21, 2006 10:03 AM
Patrick, if every nation on earth used land as efficiently as the US and western europe we'd be able to feed several times the current population without expanding the amount of arable land usage. Or, to put it another way, if every nation on earth was as efficient as we in the west, we'd be able to feed the entire planet on a fraction of the land we currently use. A large fraction, to be sure, but a lot less than is currently used. These population "bomb" predictions are old as the hills. In the 70s it was predicted that there would be ass starvation in the western world by the late 80s. In fact there was a glut of food. Production efficiency went up. It's still rising in the west, and if it rises in the rest of the world... well.
The point is, this population rubbish is just that: rubbish.
Posted by: Archonix at June 21, 2006 2:27 PM
So, Patrick, does this mean you'll be doing the righteous thing and reducing the population by offing yourself? Or, when you say "there are too many of us," do you really mean "there are too many of everybody else, but just the right amount of me."
Posted by: V the K at June 21, 2006 4:48 PM
Dear V the K, Archonix, Jael,
Sorry for offending. However, I thought this was about expressing opinions and not getting personal. I expressed an opinion and no suggestion of anyhthing sinisiter. At the end of the day, if nature hits back, it won't be a ? of choice. If you want your opinions respected, you ought to respect other peoples
Posted by: patrick at July 2, 2006 1:58 PM
