« Morbid Unreciprocated Niceness | Main | Something Rotten in the State of Denmark »
March 28, 2006
Questions for CAIR
The goons at Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — a terrorist front group that has been using political correctness, propaganda, and a hordes of lawyers in an attempt to impose dhimmitude on the United States — are not pleased that some Americans have noticed the fundamental and violent hostility Islam holds and has always held toward the rest of the world. Kudos to Investors.com for offering CAIR an opportunity to clear away the "Islamophobia" they decry by answering a few questions:
Is Islam the only religion with a doctrine, theology and legal system that mandates warfare against unbelievers?
Is it true that 26 chapters of the Quran deal with jihad, a fight able-bodied believers are obligated to join (Surah 2:216), and that the text orders Muslims to "instill terror into the hearts of the unbeliever" and to "smite above their necks" (8:12)?
Is the "test" of loyalty to Allah not good acts or faith in general, but martyrdom that results from fighting unbelievers (47:4) — the only assurance of salvation in Islam (4:74; 9:111)?
Are the sins of any Muslim who becomes a martyr forgiven by the very act of being slain while slaying the unbelievers (4:96)?
And is it really true that martyrs are rewarded with virgins, among other carnal delights, in Paradise (38:51, 55:56; 55:76; 56:22)?
Are those unable to do jihad — such as women or the elderly — required to give "asylum and aid" to those who do fight unbelievers in the cause of Allah (8:74)?
Does Islam advocate expansion by force? And is the final command of jihad, as revealed to Muhammad in the Quran, to conquer the world in the name of Islam (9:29)?
Is Islam the only religion that does not teach the Golden Rule (48:29)? Does the Quran instead teach violence and hatred against non-Muslims, specifically Jews and Christians (5:50)?
But don't forget: Islam is the Religion of Peace.
Hat tip: Michelle Malkin
Warning: the illustration for this one isn't a pretty sight.
Posted by Van Helsing at March 28, 2006 1:31 PM
Comments
Michelle Malkin. 'Nuff said.
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 28, 2006 9:24 PM
This is getting old.
I use to love slapping moonie around, but he's just so completely clueless, he has no idea when he's been outthought.
Listen, fuckwit...Malkin didn't write the questions.
If you EVER bothered to actually READ the posts you're blindly ranting at, then maybe you would have known that.
What a complete idiot. Tell me, did your parents have any children that actually LIVED, or do you all just waste space?
Posted by: HollywoodNeoCon at March 28, 2006 9:32 PM
Hollywood, anyone with half a brain already knows that wastoid couldn't have written one paragraph of even that slop.
I wish someone would introduce her to one of those new microfiber floor mops, so at least she could accomplish something worthwhile with her life.
That column is popular with wingnuts only because wingnuts are anti-intellectual and flee from critical thought and analysis. Therefore, columns like that serve as sources of information and the daily instructions for legions of neocon sheep.
That's not MY fault. You people have the media at your disposal. You can't hold me responsible for what you do with it.
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 28, 2006 9:57 PM
That's not MY fault. You people have the Manhole at your disposal...yet you won't go there like I do. You can't hold me responsible for what you do with my benwah balls.
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 28, 2006 10:14 PM
Michelle is usually spot-on Please argue the facts. She does. That's why she is so devestating.
Posted by: nikko at March 29, 2006 12:12 AM
Michelle Malkin is a racist homophobe muckraker, and nothing more.
Moonbats are uninterested in VALIDATING her plagiarized rants and lies. We simply laugh at them, ridicule her, and accept her little followers as the synchophants and anti-intellectual lackeys that they are.
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 29, 2006 1:08 AM
It's painfully obvious that Moonbat Supreme is only here to stir up discombobulation. It's not as though he's engaging is reasoned debate. Why do you keep responding to the bait? Seriously, ignore him and he'll find another site to scrabble for his Attention Fix.
Posted by: Nixon's Ninja at March 29, 2006 4:43 AM
We simply laugh at them, ridicule her, and accept her little followers as the synchophants and anti-intellectual lackeys that they are.
You know...much the same way the electorate does to us moonbats?
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 29, 2006 5:28 AM
And will continue to do.....
Posted by: nikko at March 29, 2006 10:14 AM
What with all the glorious spokespersons you moonbats have: Sean Penn, Michael Moore, SJP, Sharon Stone, Charlie Sheen, Calypso Louie, Howard Dean, the list is endless. No wonder people are staying away from the left in droves.
Posted by: nikko at March 29, 2006 10:17 AM
Who are your spokespersons, nikko?
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 29, 2006 7:19 PM
Who are your spokespersons, nikko? Do they include the big burly biker, Sven the masseur, Nigel the hairdresser, or Terrance the Tranny...all regulars down at the Manhole?
Didn't think so. We moonbats have a corner on those lookers!
Posted by: moonbat supreme at March 29, 2006 9:08 PM
Who are your spokespersons, nikko?
Oh, I dunno...the American electorate that always reject your loony leftist asses at the ballot box every couple of years?
Aside from them, I guess no one...
Posted by: Horatio at March 29, 2006 9:10 PM
