« Deborah Johns: The Anti-Sheehan | Main | Hollywood Film Snobs Cheer Reagan Being Shot »
August 18, 2005
WaPo Pulls Plug on Support for 9/11 Memorial Event
Bowing to pressure from left-wing extremists Operation Ceasefire and International ANSWER, The Washington Post has withdrawn its support for an event organized by the Defense Department to memorialize the victims of 9/11, on the grounds that the event could have a "pro-war slant."
Rick Ehrmann, a local representative for the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, was pleased with the decision. "In this case The Post was sponsoring the Pentagon's Freedom Walk, which ties the attack on Sept. 11 to the Iraq war, and of course, The Post's reporters have proven ... that there is no connection between the two, that that link is false."
That's right, according to someone who makes his living in the news industry, it is a proven fact that there is no connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq. It would be equally logical to say there was no connection between Pearl Harbor and the war against Hitler, and therefore no event to commemorate the victims of Pearl Harbor should be supported, on the grounds that someone there might be in favor of D-Day. Leftists in the news media have raised selective stupidity to an art form.
But how do they know the folks at the Freedom Walk support the war in Iraq?
Allison Barber, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Internal Communications and Public Liaison, had this to say about the Freedom Walk, as quoted in the Western Star:
This is not a statement about the war in Iraq or about any policy decisions. This is a statement about, "We remember we came under attack, and we're grateful for our men and women in the military who volunteer to serve our country."
So there you have it, they actually admit to supporting the military. But that's not the smoking gun. What really outraged the Left is that Clint Black is going to be giving a free concert at the end of the march. Not only is Black a country singer, his song "Iraq and Roll" explicitly supports our troops fighting in Iraq.
Naturally the Washington Post could have no association with an event that in turn is in any way associated with a man like Clint Black.
As Post spokesman Eric Grant puts it, "It is the Post's practice to avoid activities that might lead readers to question the objectivity of the Post's news coverage."
The word objectivity must have felt awfully strange coming out of his mouth. Is Grant worried that someone might suspect the Post of siding with their own country against al Qaeda?
Cross-posted at The Wide Awakes.
Posted by Van Helsing at August 18, 2005 8:36 PM
Comments
Is it just me, or does Clint Black look like Steven Seagal?
Posted by: Leigh at August 18, 2005 11:29 PM
It would be equally logical to say there was no connection between Pearl Harbor and the war against Hitler, and therefore no event to commemorate the victims of Pearl Harbor should be supported, on the grounds that someone there might be in favor of D-Day.
Why hasn't someone brought this up before?
RWR
Posted by: RightWingRocker at August 18, 2005 11:52 PM
I don't mind the march.
But as a survivor of the 9/11 attacks, I think a country hoe-down marking 9/11 is in incredibly bad taste.
Would we hold a rap concert at the Tomb of the Unknowns to "support the troops" on Memorial Day?
Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11. Hitler and Japan were axis powers. Hitler declared war on the US on December 8, 1941, and started going after US ships at sea, siezing US property in occupied countries, and deporting Americans. The US did not declare war on Germany until several days later.
Big differences.
Posted by: Randy Case at August 19, 2005 3:29 PM
Yeah, Randy, know what you mean, maybe that event should have been planned it to be more dignified. Say, like the Wellstone Memorial, the Whoopi Goldberg bash in NYC, or the way Cindy Sheehan chose to honor her son.
And as for WWII, Germany and Japan, if we had not had a large population of left wing pacifist in the country ignoring the global threat of Nazism and Japan's threat in the Pacific, we would have been prepared to go to war.
As for the "country hoe-down," and "rapper's serenade," I would be personally honored to listen to either, if the performers were sincere, honest, heartfelt, and performed to honor our great American fighting men and women.
Big differences.
Posted by: Eneils Bailey at August 20, 2005 6:49 AM
Randy,
By the way, can't you just give them credit for going to the time and effort to put on the event.
You seem to just be puking up the democrat talking points and political correctness. Are you trying to establish some sort of your percieved "social hierarchy" here. Country music and rapping is low class, only a performer of of your percieved social status is entitled to perform?
Posted by: Eneils Bailey at August 20, 2005 7:14 AM
Fist, Eneils Bailey, it was not the LEFT that argued against a build up prior to WWII -- it was the RIGHT. The Republicans called that "Mr Roosevelt's War" and fought throughout the 30s to build down our Navy and work for peace with Hitler.
As far as the music -- I like country and rap. But neither is appropriate in the venues described.
You don't turn a sacred day of reflection into a party or celebration. That's poor taste.
Next, there was no Wellstone "Memorial," that is a myth about what was always a political rally. Republicans put the "memorial" tag on it to make it look as tasteless as the hoe-down promises to be. You can't defend one and attack the other if you think they are both memorials.
As far as Sheehan honoring her son -- she's in the best position of anyone to determine how she wants to do that. She is, afterall, his mother.
But continue attacking the mothers of the war dead, and dishonoring the memories of those who died on 9/11.
As for me, I'd much prefer to see the concert cancelled and President Bush award the Medal of Freedom to the passengers and crew of Flight 93 -- a great, solemn, and long overdue honor -- and a tasteful way to remember our heroes on 9/11.
Posted by: Randy Case at August 22, 2005 11:30 AM
A Memorial is being built at the Pentagon to honor the Americans who died there on 9/11. The fund for this memorial is several million dollars behind schedule.
Instead of helping with an honorable way to honor these Americans killed by an enemy attack on U.S. soil, this march and concert takes money away from that monument.
It will cost $250,000 paid to the D.C. police department for extra security alone.
Posted by: Denny Hix at August 22, 2005 1:43 PM
A Memorial is being built at the Pentagon to honor the Americans who died there on 9/11. The fund for this memorial is several million dollars behind schedule. And the design for the "Memorial" is absolutely insipid. A bunch of bauhausian Euro-benches and some mud puddles. I support the idea of a Memorial, but the selected concept is stupid.
Posted by: V the K at August 23, 2005 12:52 PM
When will the lefties learn (from the right how) to support our troops?
First you send them into a war w/out the proper armor (I know it's only been 28 months and counting) then you cut the Veteran's benefits.
Then you put a ribbon magnet on your car.
Then you give a tax break to the richest .1% of Americans during wartime.
Anything else?
Posted by: Robert at August 23, 2005 6:03 PM
Yeah, Robert. You forgot scores of other MoveOn talking points. You know...the ones that go over on the electorate about as well as a fart in church? The ones that have relegated you paranoid asshats to the back of the electoral bus?
You know? THOSE talking points...
Posted by: Jonathan at August 23, 2005 6:45 PM


