« Air America's Excuses Shot Down | Main | George Galloway Incites Muslims to Violence Against the West »
August 06, 2005
"Newspaper of Record" Attempts to Erase Air America Scandal
Today I put a clothespin on my nose and flipped through the New York Times, sure that they would finally be forced to acknowledge the Air America corruption scandal, now that even the left-leaning State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer feels compelled to investigate the liberal radio network for basically stealing nearly $1 million from needy children in the Bronx in order to finance their obnoxious limousine leftist posturing.
I was wrong.
Visit the NY Times online. Enter Air America in the search box. The most recent entry, as of this afternoon, was a piece from June 15, promoting the repellent Al Franken — most famous of the boorish extremists put on the air by Err America — as candidate for the U.S. Senate.
As for a corruption scandal significant enough to engage New York's Attorney General, the newspaper of record prints not one word.
Imagine if Rush Limbaugh were the sort of lowlife who would steal from poor children, and got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Think the NY Times would manage to find space for it? Think they would manage to find space for anything else on the front page for the next six weeks?
"The Newspaper of Record" has become a melancholy joke. The NY Times has clearly relinquished that title, along with any claim to respect as a forum for professional journalism. The paper is a soap box for liberal elite propagandists who look out for their own, without any regard to journalistic ethics, the people's need to know, or even objective reality. The faster people become aware of this increasingly obvious fact, the faster this sad remnant of a newspaper will go swirling down the drain.

Posted by Van Helsing at August 6, 2005 05:09 PM
Comments
Apparently, news of well-documented evidence of malfeasance at a left-wing organization is not "fit to print," but dubious conspiracy theories about Karl Rove are.
Posted by: V the K at August 6, 2005 05:25 PM
In some ways I think this is actually worse than the Jason Blair affair. They are refusing to report on a major scandal in their own back yard! "All the news that's fit to print"? No, not for a very long time now.
Posted by: Redhand at August 6, 2005 10:50 PM
I've always been curious to know just how low subscriptions would have to be for a major newspaper to go out of business? Could the NY Times get by with five million customers? Could they get by with less than one million? I guess I'm wondering if they could still make it as a business by catering only to left leaning readers? If the answer is yes, upper management may have long ago decided to take that path. You never know.
Posted by: Jack Jones at August 6, 2005 11:05 PM
The NYT will always have their anointed leftist elite subscribers, who (sadly) still make up a considerable fraction of the US and world population. Think about it: if all the elitists from all the major universities and city penthouses/art communities keep subscribing, The Old Saggy Gray Hag might easily survive into the next decade.
Posted by: The MaryHunter at August 7, 2005 09:26 AM
Imagine if Rush Limbaugh were the sort of lowlife who would steal from poor children, and got caught with his hand in the cookie jar........He is, except it was the oxy jar.
Posted by: Rob B. at August 7, 2005 02:37 PM
Rob B.... Rush was caught stealing oxy from the poor children of... where is he now, Ft. Lauderdale? Where is your proof of this? ;)
It isn't just Err America's theft... it's the fact that the funds they stole were solicited FOR CHARITY.
Rush's oxy problem is NOT equivalent.
Posted by: mamapajamas at August 7, 2005 05:51 PM
Rob, what is your point about Limbaugh? The New York Times did and continues to publish articles about Limbaugh's drug addiction and medical records court case. Most of them are very negative in their reporting. Why not Air America? It is the logic and reaction I have come to expect from the left. I don't get it, we are dicussing the plight of Air America and you throw in a slam at Limbaugh, like the New York Times never reported it. Maybe it makes sense over at the democratic underground or dailykos, but it comes across as a turkey here.
Posted by: Eneils Bailey at August 7, 2005 05:53 PM
Oh, by the way Rob, try to be original. I know where you plagiarized the quote.
Posted by: Eneils Bailey at August 7, 2005 06:01 PM
I am sort of used to this kindergarten "Well, your side does it to" childish manner of argument from the left, but comparing Rush's drug dependency to Air America's stealing from poor children is so stupid... we're talking short-bus kindergarten. I mean, we're talking Alec Baldwin levels of stupidity.
Meanwhile, the New York Times goes fishing in John Roberts adoption records, while at the same time opposing the Patriot Act because it supposedly violates the privacy rights of terrorists. That's not just hypocritical, it's downright sleazy.
Posted by: V the K at August 7, 2005 06:14 PM
Air America is having a Design a Bumper Sticker Contests. Say Anything Blog Has a Great Assortment of Alternative Possibilities
My favorites so far:
Air America: Because Limos Are So Much More Important Than School Lunches Or Medicine
Air America: The Only Thing Lower Than Our Ratings Are Our Morals.
Air America: We explained the scandal to our listeners. Both of them were appalled.
Posted by: V the K at August 8, 2005 09:04 AM
Part of the point was that it is ok, apparently, for the right to hold up guys like Rove, Limbaugh, and Bush as new messiahs, while beating down anyone on the left just 'cuz. How can you practice the principles you bemoan others for doing, yet, not see the hypocrisy?
Posted by: Rob B. at August 8, 2005 09:17 AM
Oh, get over yourself, princess. First of all, no one holds those guys up as "Messiahs." Rove, Limbaugh, and to a much lesser extent Bush, are respected for their ability to do their jobs. That's about it. It's no where near the idol worship foisted on Michael Moore or other leftist icons. The Cult of Personality is primarily a leftist fetish.
And secondly, tell us Rob, because we really want to know, what charities for children and old people had their donations stolen by Rush, Bush, or Rove? And why is the New York Times... which was all over that half-baked rumor about Karl Rove... so reluctant to talk about Air American robbing children's charities?
Posted by: V the K at August 8, 2005 09:26 AM
The Times ignored Durtbag Durbin's slander against our troops uttered on the Senate floor. But Trent Lott makes a mild remark at a party on the occasion of Strom Thurmond's birthday and it's front page news.
I gave up on the Times years ago. Used to be a great resource but it's just become so transparently partisan. And they don't even realize it.
Posted by: Mike on Hilton Head Island at August 9, 2005 02:04 AM